Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Astrology In Fighting... Interesting perspective

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
    you have to look at the top only. the top 50 is not a randomly selected 50. it is funnelled through a pool of millions. do you grasp this? you have to understand this before we move on.

    for instance, we can say black people are better at basketball based on the over-representation of them atop the NBA. the over-representation in the HOF.

    you can't look at the entire pool of participants. if you did you'd have way more white and asian participants than blacks. are asians and whites better than blacks in general in basketball? you have to focus at the top to arrive at inclination conclusions.


    do you understand that?

    **** i'm tired of talking to your dumbass. but i can't help it. it's like watching a train wreck.
    I'm not debating that you need to just look at the top, but the sample size needs to be increased to get a really accurate picture. Say, top 100 or top 150. There's a formula to figure it out, but frankly, I forgot it. You're such a ****ing genius, you should know it. With a pool of 50, you can't get an accurate representation of 12 separate categories, no matter how many times you call me a ******.

    Comment


      Originally posted by BigStereotype View Post
      I'm not debating that you need to just look at the top, but the sample size needs to be increased to get a really accurate picture. Say, top 100 or top 150. There's a formula to figure it out, but frankly, I forgot it. You're such a ****ing genius, you should know it. With a pool of 50, you can't get an accurate representation of 12 separate categories, no matter how many times you call me a ******.
      the sample size is not 50.

      the pool is not 50.

      the sample size is actually the entire history of boxing. the 50 is a result of funnelling from millions.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
        the sample size is not 50.

        the pool is not 50.

        the sample size is actually the entire history of boxing. the 50 is a result of funnelling from millions.
        I'm sorry, are you arbitrarily setting a limit on the amount of fighters you'll test? Then it's a sample size because it's not the population of fighters. I think the question is do YOU know anything about statistics? Because so far, you've demonstrated absolutely knowledge of statistical analysis.

        Comment


          Originally posted by BigStereotype View Post
          I'm sorry, are you arbitrarily setting a limit on the amount of fighters you'll test? Then it's a sample size because it's not the population of fighters. I think the question is do YOU know anything about statistics? Because so far, you've demonstrated absolutely knowledge of statistical analysis.
          50 top boxers of all time just so happens to be the ATG list. i didn't set the #.

          however that is enough information to draw an inclination. nobody said it was absolute.

          once again it's like listing the 50 greatest runningbacks of all time. it is enough of a talent pool to draw inclinations from. but if 2-3 of the rbs are white then we are all equal! - idiot


          and yes i have demonstrated absolute knowledge of statistical analysis while you are being a stubborn child.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
            50 top boxers of all time just so happens to be the ATG list. i didn't set the #.

            however that is enough information to draw an inclination. nobody said it was absolute.

            once again it's like listing the 50 greatest runningbacks of all time. it is enough of a talent pool to draw inclinations from. but if 2-3 of the rbs are white then we are all equal! - idiot


            and yes i have demonstrated absolute knowledge of statistical analysis while you are being a stubborn child.
            Well, no, not really. You did set the number for ATG. I've heard it at 50, 100, 200, 75, really all over the place. And no, it's not like sampling race. Not at all. For the most part, there are two possibilities for race in the NFL. I haven't seen many players who aren't either black or white. So that's a 50/50 split if it's evenly divided. If there are only 3 white running backs (two words) on that list, that's 94/6 percent split. That's easily a big enough sample to say that there's a statistically meaningful difference between the categories. However, when you have 12 categories, it's 8.3% per category. You're going to have anomalies. Even if they happen to match up with your initial hypothesis, it's still not proof. The margin of error is massive. Do I have to explain what margin of error and standard deviation are?

            Comment


              Can I do well in Boxing?

              The following are mine,

              Sun in Gemini
              Gemini ascendant Libra
              Sun in IX
              869 Conjunction Sun - Mercury
              72 Trine Sun - Ascendant
              Moon in Leo
              Moon in X
              532 Conjunction Moon - Venus
              104 Conjunction Moon - Mars
              346 Conjunction Moon - Jupiter
              -325 Opposition Moon - Saturn
              57 Conjunction Moon - Midheaven
              Mercury in Gemini
              Mercury in IX
              115 Trine Mercury - Ascendant
              Venus in Leo
              Venus in X
              388 Conjunction Venus - Mars
              378 Conjunction Venus - Jupiter
              -213 Opposition Venus - Saturn
              Mars in Leo
              Mars in X
              422 Conjunction Mars - Jupiter
              -109 Opposition Mars - Saturn
              Jupiter in Leo
              Jupiter in X
              -111 Opposition Jupiter - Saturn
              Saturn in Aquarius
              Saturn in IV
              -28 Opposition Saturn - Midheaven
              Uranus in Capricorn
              Uranus in III
              132 Conjunction Uranus - Neptune
              Neptune in Capricorn
              Neptune in III
              43 ***tile Neptune - Pluto
              -1 Square Neptune - Ascendant
              Pluto in Scorpio



              There's a lot more, so here's my chart;

              Comment


                Wait so no predictions on my matches? =( I'm very disappointed.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by El Más Mejor View Post
                  Wait so no predictions on my matches? =( I'm very disappointed.
                  You are clearly too ******ed and close minded to be dealt with. This system only works on the fighters that Rassclot says, anyway.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
                    a great explanation of astrology actually affecting us is the scientific fact that the ocean tides are gravitationally moved and orchestrated by the celestial bodies. the moon most significantly. however the moon is affected by it's surrounding constellations. a chain reaction of energies if you will.


                    you can read on up this fact if you like.


                    now, 80% of a newborn's body is water.

                    60% of a grown man's body is water.

                    Comment


                      Astrologically Pac whoops Mayweather.

                      Sun:

                      Pac: SAG
                      Mayweather: PISCES

                      Advantage: PAC

                      Moon:

                      Pac: Leo
                      Mayweather: Taurus

                      Advantage: Mayweather

                      Mars (planet of war)

                      Pac: Capricorn
                      Mayweather: Aquarius

                      Advantage: PAC BY BLOWOUT

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP