Originally posted by Gorilla Dogs
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Roach: I Don't Think Mayweather-Pacquiao Will Happen
Collapse
-
-
[QUOTE=Jakutindi Wauya;9180462]The last time around Pacquiao refused the blood test and signed with Clottey.Mayweather never closed the door listen to what Roach himself had to say.Wasnt this the reason Mayweather fought Mosley because Pacquiao wasnt ready
Pac was less then 2 months away from his March 13 fight date, and you expected Pac to wait for Floyd?
People kept saying Pac should have waited for floyd back in July, and its already Sept and Floyd still has no plans to fight
Comment
-
Originally posted by JK1700 View PostI'm never reading anything from Roach again. This guy has become an absolute joke. He's claiming that Floyd ducked Margarito now that Pacquiao is fighting him. People need to remember that Margarito vs Mosley was to determine the best welterweight. Mosley won. Floyd fought the winner and won. Pacquiao is fighting the loser at a catchweight for a vacant belt.
Says it all. Roach is a disgrace.
This is one of the most ignorent comments in a while that is kind of sig worthy
Catch up on your boxing history so next time you dont
Comment
-
[QUOTE=yevskiy426;9180475]Originally posted by Jakutindi Wauya View PostThe last time around Pacquiao refused the blood test and signed with Clottey.Mayweather never closed the door listen to what Roach himself had to say.Wasnt this the reason Mayweather fought Mosley because Pacquiao wasnt ready
Pac was less then 2 months away from his March 13 fight date, and you expected Pac to wait for Floyd?
People kept saying Pac should have waited for floyd back in July, and its already Sept and Floyd still has no plans to fightLast edited by BadBrains; 09-06-2010, 03:00 AM.
Comment
-
i think that pac would have actually beat cotto regardless of the damage he took against margo (even if the margo fight never even happened to cotto) i just think it's a bad style for cotto. i can remember that prime cotto barely edged mosley by 1 or 2 rounds. although cotto has always been a good tough fighter i think pac would have done good against him regardless.
Comment
-
-
"Pacquiao uses PED's for disgraceful titles and catchweights, Mayweather ducks everyone and loses his marketing ability when he risks his zero and is therefore scared."
Done. Just summarized where this thread is gonna end up. Now we can all move on and talk about the Super Six, =].
Comment
-
Originally posted by americanbot View Posti think that pac would have actually beat cotto regardless of the damage he took against margo (even if the margo fight never even happened to cotto) i just think it's a bad style for cotto. i can remember that prime cotto barely edged mosley by 1 or 2 rounds. although cotto has always been a good tough fighter i think pac would have done good against him regardless.
Mosley-Margarito - Floyd fought the WINNER
Pacquiao-Marquez - Floyd fought the WINNER (we all know he won)
Judah-Baldomir - Floyd fought the WINNER AND the LOSER.
Raheem-Morales - Pacquiao fought the LOSER
Mayweather-Hatton - Pacquiao fought the LOSER
Mosley-Margarito - Pacquiao fought the LOSER
It's a complete myth that Pacquiao fights the best. The guy picks his fights. Floyd picks his fights too but at least he fights live opponents.Last edited by JK1700; 09-06-2010, 03:15 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vercingetorix3 View Post"Pacquiao uses PED's for disgraceful titles and catchweights, Mayweather ducks everyone and loses his marketing ability when he risks his zero and is therefore scared."
Done. Just summarized where this thread is gonna end up. Now we can all move on and talk about the Super Six, =].
Comment
-
Originally posted by yevskiy426 View PostLol thats becoming a joke too with this whole Ward-Dirrell situation
Comment
Comment