Originally posted by BillyBoxing
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Doug Fischer: "Wlad Klitschko would've been dangerous to ANYBODY in history even Ali"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Pirao View PostWhen did Wlad fight Lewis?
Lewis>>>Holyfield, BTW.
A prime Holyfield could deal with Wlad. It would be ugly and I would cheer for Wlad but still, the style Holyfield employs wins ugly fights.Last edited by omarinbox; 08-23-2010, 01:22 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tim Horton View PostAnd besides Rahman, who had Sanders fought?
Check Ernie Terrell's stats as well as Cleveland Williams. And quit talking out of your backside.Originally posted by brick wall View Postholmes fought norton in 1978 not 80's...past prime but still good. and so what if shavers lost to a fighter with a losing record before he fought holmes? wlad lost to that bum purrity by ko...what does that make of wlad? he lost again by ko to sanders and brewsters...both have losses in their records before they fought wlad. you know what the difference is? holmes defeated shavers by ko whereas wlad got his ass kicked by purrity, sanders and brewster.
Norton was way past it, started to barely show up for fights. Shavers lost to a fighter with a LOSING record. No the 2 loss Corrie Sanders, no a guy who lost more than he had won. Shavers lost to stallings in shavers' prime. You are going to count a Wlad loss to Purrity where he was on his 12th fight in 12 months and got tired.
Ali lost to Berbick, berbick was trash. How can you think Wlad would lose to Ali?
See what happens, you can play the prime game but no one else can right?
Ali was floored bya 185 lbs journeyman. Wait? before prime right?
Outta here joke.
Comment
-
Originally posted by street bully View PostBro Wlad is a good underrted fighteer, but saying he is bigger than Tirell is a joke. He weighed 10 pounds (of fat) more than Tirell, and if he was in the type of shape Tirell was in he would have been a cruiserweight. HWs back then had to come in the shape of their lives to go 15 rounds, which seperates then men from the boys. A few pound sof fat does not make you bigger. Tirell was built like a brick house, and if he was out of shape he would have been over 260 pounds, bu surley he would be better at 215 ripped an ready then he would have been all flabby like Sanders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by street bully View PostBro Wlad is a good underrted fighteer, but saying he is bigger than Tirell is a joke. He weighed 10 pounds (of fat) more than Tirell, and if he was in the type of shape Tirell was in he would have been a cruiserweight. HWs back then had to come in the shape of their lives to go 15 rounds, which seperates then men from the boys. A few pound sof fat does not make you bigger. Tirell was built like a brick house, and if he was out of shape he would have been over 260 pounds, bu surley he would be better at 215 ripped an ready then he would have been all flabby like Sanders.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wlad Klitschko View PostHaha and if Terrell was built like brick house than Wlad is not human. Wlad is the same height with 40 more lbs of rock hard muscle, so what is he built like? Whata re you even talking about? And weight=mass, and can definitely help the velocity of your punches and size can do a ton in a clinch... Who clinched a ton? Oh yeah...Ali.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Wlad Klitschko View Posti stopped reading when you said hws back then had to come in shape. Youve clearly never heard of Buster Mathis. Also Sanders wasnt 10 lbs of fat. Calling Terrell ripped...red k. Terrell was skinny and not very good and Sanders would have floored him.
Comment
Comment