They've turned on Floyd.

[The Big Dunn]

He never did have any excuse not to fight Pac. PBF's attitude was bound to catch up with him, eventually. When you are not a very nice person, sooner or later the majority will realize that they do not like you, whatever the size of your talent or your bank balance.

Fair point. But that doesn't make you wrong. The facts should be argued not whether or not you like someone first.

[TxHustla]

FLoyds not a real mans boxer...****ing *****.

[Webber676]

isnt it su****ious to anyone of you??? He used to talk to much sh***t and now he has shut himself up! name it as you want but I would name it "fear"

[champ_kw]

*waits for an onslaught of excuses from the *****s*

I don't know the actual agreeing points of the "proposal" so I can't intelligently comment on if Floyd is to blame for the fight not happening now. However, I do know what the agreeing points of the "proposal" were last time and it was Pac who balked at them then. So with that said, sign me up for the same "onslaught of excuses" you used when Pac didn't sign earlier this year. Thanks.

[champ_kw]

if i suspect you of ******ing children without any evidence or charge whatsoever,

should you jump through hoops?


if the cops say there is no need for an investigation or charge or courtdate (extra steroid testing never been done before in the history of prizefighting),

should you still go to court to prove yourself innocent because im convinced you ****** children?

Terrible analogy. I guarantee if someone said you ****d them, you'd be brought in to submit saliva and DNA testing. I don't see why it's such a big deal when every sport in the world all the way down to riding a doggone bike up a hill has people using performance enhancing drugs. It's not beyond the realm of possibility. If he's innocent, he should act like he's an athlete in 2010 and submit to the test. It's the way of the world unfortunately.

[Prime 407]

Terrible analogy. I guarantee if someone said you ****d them, you'd be brought in to submit saliva and DNA testing. I don't see why it's such a big deal when every sport in the world all the way down to riding a doggone bike up a hill has people using performance enhancing drugs. It's not beyond the realm of possibility. If he's innocent, he should act like he's an athlete in 2010 and submit to the test. It's the way of the world unfortunately.

That's an even worse analogy mate, that's like saying Floyd injected Pacquaio himself and is now dobbing him in with first hand knowledge (or claimed first hand knowledge). Fact is Floyd is just going on a su****ion more than anything else and no hard evidence at all.

[Prime 407]

But I do agree with the TS that the media has turned on Floyd. Everyone will eventually, there's only so long you can get away with BS before people start to wise up.

[pasawayako]

Every day that goes by is like a stomp in the balls of all *****s

hahhahhahaha, i feel sorry for the *****s for having a chicken boxer..... hahahhaha

[odogg8121]

No, he didn't. It's dumb to think that someone would attempt to tarnish another man's legacy. Pacquiao did all that to himself, and in my opinion he deserves the backlash.

What needed to happen was

1. Pacquiao accepts to take the full.
2. His team shuts the fuck up about it.

Neither happened. And again, how do you know whats on the contract?

link me to where it says Pac agreed up to the fight please...thanks in advance...although i know you dont have that link for that made up **** lol

[fabie]

if i suspect you of ******ing children without any evidence or charge whatsoever,

should you jump through hoops?


if the cops say there is no need for an investigation or charge or courtdate (extra steroid testing never been done before in the history of prizefighting),

should you still go to court to prove yourself innocent because im convinced you ****** children?

Sadly what our country is turning into is GUILTY UPON PROVEN SO.

Some people are so ingrate that not really understanding how it works in the real world. Akin to someone accusing the President of foul things such as **** for example.

Without "proofs", there won't even be a Preliminary Court hearing - let alone the actual and formal accusation with the due process of law.

Now this "TAKE THE TEST FIRST" without proven grounds is simply weightless, juvenile and a show of disregards to conformity of rules of engagement.

It shows further the "maturity" of the accuser (or lack thereof). And bringing it towards sensationalism as their maint reason "not to fight" is the ultimate slap towards one's intellect.