Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why steal the WBC belt from Vitaliy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Why steal the WBC belt from Vitaliy

    By Scoop Malinowsky:

    More Questions: The WBC is now under pressure to strip Vitali Klitschko of his WBC belt because he wants to defend against Calvin Brock in September before meeting the winner of the August showdown between Rahman-Barrett in December. Why are Rahman's people so eager to strip Vitali? They know Rock will automatically get the next WBC shot if he beats Barrett. Why can't they wait just a few months? Would they prefer to steal the WBC belt from Klitschko rather than actually have to get in a ring with him to try and take it the real way? And why would the WBC, if they strip Klitschko as they very likely will try to do, why would they forfeit the sanction fee of Klitschko-Brock? Is the reason because they feel obligated to cater to a promoter who fears the Klitschkos?

    Why can't Rahman wait just a few months till December to fight Klitschko? It's not like he really deserves the shot anyway, look at his recent victories over subpar opposition.

    The whole thing is beginning to smell like an all-out Don King assualt to freeze out the Klitschko from his heavyweight world.

    Will Don King ever put himself in a position to match his fighters with either Klitschko with no options, no nothing? Would he ever put himself in the position to stand at a press conference after the Klitschkos have destroyed Brewster or Rahman or Byrd and stand there in the background like a secondary figure? What would he say then, Viva The Ukraine!??
    Last edited by Nautilus; 07-10-2005, 10:50 PM.

    #2
    Vitali has delayed the fight 4 times. What a ridiculous ******* that writer is. He must crave Vitali's ****.

    Comment


      #3
      im a klitschko fan we all kow that. im also a rahman fan. but IMO if the winner of the rahman barret fight IS WILLING TO FIGHT like a month after, then vitali should have to just do his mandatory. otherwise let him have a volunteer defence, n set up a fight for the winter

      Comment


        #4
        i say, let frankenstein fight Brock, Rahman or Barret can have what's left over

        Comment


          #5
          Rahman is hungry right now but he is getting ahead of himself. I woulden't be surprised if Barrett beats him. Then I will really be laughing. I see him on tv at parties, I don't even know if he is taking this fight serious.

          Comment


            #6
            i think peopel forget that rahman back out of this fight in the first place before he stopped whining like a little *****

            Comment


              #7
              The Klitschko Brothers are an embarrassment to the sport. I don't see how any true boxing fan can cheer for these guys. One of em chooses to fight in court rather than take on a guy that put him on his ass last time they fought.

              The other one backs out of fighting his first dangerous opponent 4 TIMES. Strip him already. And send Wlad back down to the bottom of the rankings where his ***** ass belongs.

              Comment


                #8
                Viva The Ukraine!??
                Is the guy who wrote that article from Ukraine or something? Because he seems fond of the brothers.

                Originally posted by The Devil
                Vitali has delayed the fight 4 times. What a ridiculous ******* that writer is. He must crave Vitali's ****.
                Read the full article. He seems to like both V and W.

                I agree with riz. It would be easier for Vitali (especially if he wants to keep the green belt) if he just waits and see what happens in Rahman-Barret. If the winner of that mentioned fight would be unable to fight within a month, then go ahead with Brock. Remember that Vitali already used his optional defense against that of a mismatch with Danny.

                - Z

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                  take on a guy that put him on his ass last time they fought.

                  .
                  Man if one knockdown means rematch then we got along list of embarrassments. We need to see
                  Tito Mayorga 2
                  Byrd Mcline 2
                  Ruiz Toney 2
                  Ruiz Golata 2
                  Wlad Brewster 2
                  Brock Mcline 2
                  and so on........

                  Now if you would have said the fight was not conclusive you may of had a point.......

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                    The Klitschko Brothers are an embarrassment to the sport. I don't see how any true boxing fan can cheer for these guys. One of em chooses to fight in court rather than take on a guy that put him on his ass last time they fought.

                    The other one backs out of fighting his first dangerous opponent 4 TIMES. Strip him already. And send Wlad back down to the bottom of the rankings where his ***** ass belongs.

                    Amen.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP