Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whos #1 at super middle weight now? (POLL)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
    Guess what. Danish television showed the Kessler-Froch fight as build-up to Ward-Green. That was the first time I saw it with danish commentary. They had it 11-1 Kessler!

    There where clear rounds for froch that they scored for Kessler without even calling them close!
    That was my scorecard.

    Comment


      #52
      How Dirrell could even be mentioned as a potential number one is simply un-acceptable to me. He couldn't even beat Froch whom isn't such an awful style for him.

      I'd say it's tight between Ward, Kessler and Bute tbh. It's gona be subjective, especially at the moment until they all fight once more - by which point it should be clearer.

      I feel sorry for Bute in a way because he's left with guys outside of the Super 6. All he can do is keep winning.

      Comment


        #53
        Ward.

        He is more proven, even though i don't like him as a boxer.

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Ivansmamma View Post
          You only gave Froch five rounds? You gave all the close rounds to Kessler? I would not score it that way but it's understandable some rounds like second, fourth and ninth were close and could have gone either way but i would not have given that many to Kessler. I had seven rounds for Froch when i watched it live and when i rewatched i gave one more close round to Froch.
          Yeah, agree to disagree but no way Froch won 8. He didn't do enough and land enough to win 8 in my opinion.

          I gave him 5. Even some of the rounds he connected on Kessler, Kessler still connected more.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Ivansmamma View Post
            You only gave Froch five rounds? You gave all the close rounds to Kessler? I would not score it that way but it's understandable some rounds like second, fourth and ninth were close and could have gone either way but i would not have given that many to Kessler. I had seven rounds for Froch when i watched it live and when i rewatched i gave one more close round to Froch.
            Jreck never had Kessler behind I'm sure. The closest he had was 2-2 or 3-3.

            That's what I remember.

            Comment


              #56
              Bute.

              If I had to put money on the fight, I'd be putting mine on Bute. So long as the fight is not in Oakland or California in general. The fight needs a referee that would deduct points for excessive holding to keep it clean.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                Jreck never had Kessler behind I'm sure. The closest he had was 2-2 or 3-3.

                That's what I remember.
                Good memory

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by badass316 View Post
                  Bute.

                  If I had to put money on the fight, I'd be putting mine on Bute. So long as the fight is not in Oakland or California in general. The fight needs a referee that would deduct points for excessive holding to keep it clean.
                  Seriously, you have to blast Ward as he's coming in to keep him honest.

                  But no one so far is quick enough or times him well enough to step back and fire an uppercut before he hugs.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    With a FAIR referee who stops him from fouling, several boxers (Bute, Froch, Dirrell, Bika) would defeat Ward.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                      Jreck never had Kessler behind I'm sure. The closest he had was 2-2 or 3-3.

                      That's what I remember.
                      I had it even after four and even after eight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP