if you were a juror in Pac's lawsuit, would you be convinced by Mayweather's evidence

[bongwater]

So Pacquiao's defamation lawsuit is still pressing forward. If you were on the jury and the question was asked to camp Mayweather, "what evidence" does he have that Pacquiao is on steroids? Allegations must be backed by evidence.

Judge & jury to the defendants (Mayweather & Goldenboy): "show us the evidence"

Where's the evidence that can exonerate Mayweather of defamation?

[ThePunchingBag]

Mayweather has NO evidence.

Refusal to test does not imply guilt in a court of law.

[Steven Adams]

i thought you gotta accuse someone first?

[TheManniePhresh]

i would let mayweather win. because ppl like pacquiao are wasting the judicial systems time and tax payers money on frivilous lawsuits. i dont give a **** if his ***** is hurt but he wont waste american tax payers money on wastes of time bull****.

[feefiflofum]

i would let mayweather win. because ppl like pacquiao are wasting the judicial systems time and tax payers money on frivilous lawsuits. i dont give a **** if his ***** is hurt but he wont waste american tax payers money on wastes of time bull****.

u think having ur rep destroyed base on nothing is frivilous? u better hope it doesnt happen to u and u get run through the mud.. or better yet u do that to someone and he shows u some street justice and pop a few in ur ass.. lets see how frivilous ud think that is

[-The Glove-]

There are jurors in a civil case?


Ah, I see its addressed by the 7th *********.

[War Dinamita]

Find me a quote that shows me and everyone else he accused Pac of using steroids.

How come he's not suing Atlas, Paulie, and the other people who clearly accused him of using PEDs in the media?

[TheManniePhresh]

u think having ur rep destroyed base on nothing is frivilous? u better hope it doesnt happen to u and u get run through the mud.. or better yet u do that to someone and he shows u some street justice and pop a few in ur ass.. lets see how frivilous ud think that is

if i want a better paying job than the one i got but they ask me to take a drug test and i decline i dont get the job and it raises eyebrows at me. likewise to manny. if i try to sue them because they have an opinion of me because i turned down the great paying job because of a drug test a good judge will throw that waste of ime out of thecourt and hopefully fine my dumbass for wasting the courts time and taxpayers money.

[feefiflofum]

if i want a better paying job than the one i got but they ask me to take a drug test and i decline i dont get the job and it raises eyebrows at me. likewise to manny. if i try to sue them because they have an opinion of me because i turned down the great paying job because of a drug test a good judge will throw that waste of ime out of thecourt and hopefully fine my dumbass for wasting the courts time and taxpayers money.

u have a ridicilous analogy, hows that even like manny's case?? gtfo with ur idiom cliche bs but like i said.. u dont like this settled in the court, there's always "other ways".. thats just my point, im a leave it at that and by the way.. the taxpayers r not paying for it.. the loser of the case usually does, it's one of the "side effects" of losing a case brought to you or if ur the one making it

[neoz]

if i want a better paying job than the one i got but they ask me to take a drug test and i decline i dont get the job and it raises eyebrows at me. likewise to manny. if i try to sue them because they have an opinion of me because i turned down the great paying job because of a drug test a good judge will throw that waste of ime out of thecourt and hopefully fine my dumbass for wasting the courts time and taxpayers money.

What a ****** example