Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

if you were a juror in Pac's lawsuit, would you be convinced by Mayweather's evidence

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    wat evadinse??

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by bongwater View Post


      So Pacquiao's defamation lawsuit is still pressing forward. If you were on the jury and the question was asked to camp Mayweather, "what evidence" does he have that Pacquiao is on steroids? Allegations must be backed by evidence.

      Judge & jury to the defendants (Mayweather & Goldenboy): "show us the evidence"

      Where's the evidence that can exonerate Mayweather of defamation?
      kid i know its been said before, but mayweather has no evidence. he has a su****ion and he voiced it. that is not a crime. hence, the reason he asked for te blood test during negotiation. whether floyd is scared is neither here nor there. manny pacquiao refused, and thats why this fight has not been made. the lawsuit filed by manny was calculated move to regain leverage in the negotiation to persuade floyd to 'shut up' and drop the blood test, should he want the fight to happen.

      but floyd turned to mosley, which noone expected. meanwhile roach let slip manny would drop the lawsuit, should floyd drop the blood test. he was then slapped with again gagging order by manny himself. i feel sorry for any american *******, who is paying for this faceless and tasteless lawsuit.

      tax is a b!tch ain't it!?

      however, kudos to both fighters... got da whole world sprung on dis one...

      Comment


        #23
        this thread cant be real.

        so floyd has filed a lawsuit against pac and has to prove hes juicing *head scratch*

        could have sworn pac is the one that filed the lawsuit, therefore, he has to prove how these comments affected his career and name.

        haha, silly *******s

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by yesir View Post
          this thread cant be real.

          so floyd has filed a lawsuit against pac and has to prove hes juicing *head scratch*

          could have sworn pac is the one that filed the lawsuit, therefore, he has to prove how these comments affected his career and name.

          haha, silly *******s
          Probably the best defense against a slander suit is to provide evidence that the statements are based on truth, that's what this thread is addressing.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by madsweeney View Post
            Probably the best defense against a slander suit is to provide evidence that the statements are based on truth, that's what this thread is addressing.
            The onus is on Pacquiao to prove that he's been slandered - and that it will affect him financially. Good luck with that.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by bongwater View Post


              So Pacquiao's defamation lawsuit is still pressing forward. If you were on the jury and the question was asked to camp Mayweather, "what evidence" does he have that Pacquiao is on steroids? Allegations must be backed by evidence.

              Judge & jury to the defendants (Mayweather & Goldenboy): "show us the evidence"

              Where's the evidence that can exonerate Mayweather of defamation?
              Actually Mayweather is the defendant, he doesn't have to prove anything. Manny's lawyers have to prove that Floyd slandered him and caused him monetary damages. Learn something about court room procedures before you come up with a crap thread.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Benavidez Mafia View Post
                Find me a quote that shows me and everyone else he accused Pac of using steroids.

                How come he's not suing Atlas, Paulie, and the other people who clearly accused him of using PEDs in the media?
                Promise me you will banish here forever without using any alt if I give you some?

                Comment


                  #28
                  um.. a defamation lawsuit isn't gonna be a trial by jury since it's a civil lawsuit.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by yesir View Post
                    this thread cant be real.

                    so floyd has filed a lawsuit against pac and has to prove hes juicing *head scratch*

                    could have sworn pac is the one that filed the lawsuit, therefore, he has to prove how these comments affected his career and name.

                    haha, silly *******s
                    I think the angle that Team Manny is leveraging is the consfiracy to defame Manny by GBP. They are after GBP more than Team Mayweather...
                    They are using the failed Mayweather negotiation as lost revenue and accused GBP of consfiring against Pac (their client) since the JMM rematch.
                    Team Manny wants out of the GBP contract, that is all...

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by BuckToothed View Post
                      I think the angle that Team Manny is leveraging is the consfiracy to defame Manny by GBP. They are after GBP more than Team Mayweather...
                      They are using the failed Mayweather negotiation as lost revenue and accused GBP of consfiring against Pac (their client) since the JMM rematch.
                      Team Manny wants out of the GBP contract, that is all...
                      That's so hilarious.

                      "So you pulled out of the fight."

                      "Yes, your honor."

                      "And now you're suing them because you pulled out?"

                      "Yes, they accused me so I pulled out and lost money so now I'm suing."



                      You guys will believe anything.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP