I know this topic has been beaten to death and slaughtered Many times over. But some of the Pacquiao fans (Umeed) thinks that the 24 days option proposed by Manny is fair. As we all know PBF wanted up to the day of the fight testing or 0 days. While Pacman wanted a 30 day/1 month window. PBF later proposed a 14 day option and Team Pacman didn't accept the proposition. What I want to know is what do you think is fair. Or if you had control as an outside mediator what would you propose?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is the more resonable compromise?
Collapse
-
Obviously the middle date is the best compromise, and most fair.
It doesn't take a genius to know that.
-
Originally posted by flexxx145 View PostI know this topic has been beaten to death and slaughtered Many times over. But some of the Pacquiao fans (Umeed) thinks that the 24 days option proposed by Manny is fair. As we all know PBF wanted up to the day of the fight testing or 0 days. While Pacman wanted a 30 day/1 month window. PBF later proposed a 14 day option and Team Pacman didn't accept the proposition. What I want to know is what do you think is fair. Or if you had control as an outside mediator what would you propose?
Random drug testing till weight in..
I always been for random drug testing. Just not how Mayweather and team attacked pac with false accusations..
They should have went NSAC first..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gutz View PostRandom drug testing till weight in..
I always been for random drug testing. Just not how Mayweather and team attacked pac with false accusations..
They should have went NSAC first..
The only thing I agree with is that Team Mayweather needs to be more respectful. Baseless accusations and insults can cause deaths.
Comment
-
Originally posted by flexxx145 View PostMaybe it does, either way I want to know why they think 24 days is a fairer proposition.
what i was trying to tell you, had you bothered to try and comprehend it more, was that the thread title of the previous thread wasn't neutral and was one of the reasons of the lopsided ratio of the votes (causing unneeded ******s from a certain group of posters). my challenge was for you to make a thread with the exact opposite title of that one (which you clearly didn't do, but whatever)to prove you that the results wouldn't be that much of a landslide.
comprende?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ummeed View Posti don't know if you are talking about me, but try reading my posts from that previous thread. i never said 24 days is "fairer(wtf)", i said both can be considered fair.
what i was trying to tell you, had you bothered to try and comprehend it more, was that the thread title of the previous thread wasn't neutral and was one of the reasons of the lopsided ratio of the votes (causing unneeded ******s from a certain group of posters). my challenge was for you to make a thread with the exact opposite title of that one (which you clearly didn't do, but whatever)to prove you that the results wouldn't be that much of a landslide.
comprende?
Comment
-
Originally posted by flexxx145 View PostYour right I didn't bother to try to comprehend you more. I put up the 24 day option vs the 14 day option and let the forums decide. If you want something done your way, do it yourself.
Comment
-
I want 0 days. You want 30 days. Cut that ***** in the middle. Seems like a sensible compromise to me. This really is beating a dead horse though.
Comment
Comment