Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is the more resonable compromise?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    What is the more resonable compromise?

    I know this topic has been beaten to death and slaughtered Many times over. But some of the Pacquiao fans (Umeed) thinks that the 24 days option proposed by Manny is fair. As we all know PBF wanted up to the day of the fight testing or 0 days. While Pacman wanted a 30 day/1 month window. PBF later proposed a 14 day option and Team Pacman didn't accept the proposition. What I want to know is what do you think is fair. Or if you had control as an outside mediator what would you propose?
    20
    24 days, 1/4, 75:25
    10.00%
    2
    14 days, 1/2 50:50
    70.00%
    14
    Eliminate demands on both sides!!!
    20.00%
    4

    #2
    Obviously the middle date is the best compromise, and most fair.

    It doesn't take a genius to know that.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by flexxx145 View Post
      I know this topic has been beaten to death and slaughtered Many times over. But some of the Pacquiao fans (Umeed) thinks that the 24 days option proposed by Manny is fair. As we all know PBF wanted up to the day of the fight testing or 0 days. While Pacman wanted a 30 day/1 month window. PBF later proposed a 14 day option and Team Pacman didn't accept the proposition. What I want to know is what do you think is fair. Or if you had control as an outside mediator what would you propose?


      Random drug testing till weight in..

      I always been for random drug testing. Just not how Mayweather and team attacked pac with false accusations..

      They should have went NSAC first..

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by AC-Voltage View Post
        Obviously the middle date is the best compromise, and most fair.

        It doesn't take a genius to know that.
        Maybe it does, either way I want to know why they think 24 days is a fairer proposition.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Gutz View Post
          Random drug testing till weight in..

          I always been for random drug testing. Just not how Mayweather and team attacked pac with false accusations..

          They should have went NSAC first..
          Why should they have gone to the commission first? The commission doesn't want to spend the funds for better testing. They should've been the ones to propose this type of testing first. It just shows that the commissions are just there to collect their fee nothing else. The current testing system has been failing for a long time now.

          The only thing I agree with is that Team Mayweather needs to be more respectful. Baseless accusations and insults can cause deaths.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by flexxx145 View Post
            Maybe it does, either way I want to know why they think 24 days is a fairer proposition.
            i don't know if you are talking about me, but try reading my posts from that previous thread. i never said 24 days is "fairer(wtf)", i said both can be considered fair.

            what i was trying to tell you, had you bothered to try and comprehend it more, was that the thread title of the previous thread wasn't neutral and was one of the reasons of the lopsided ratio of the votes (causing unneeded ******s from a certain group of posters). my challenge was for you to make a thread with the exact opposite title of that one (which you clearly didn't do, but whatever)to prove you that the results wouldn't be that much of a landslide.

            comprende?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by ummeed View Post
              i don't know if you are talking about me, but try reading my posts from that previous thread. i never said 24 days is "fairer(wtf)", i said both can be considered fair.

              what i was trying to tell you, had you bothered to try and comprehend it more, was that the thread title of the previous thread wasn't neutral and was one of the reasons of the lopsided ratio of the votes (causing unneeded ******s from a certain group of posters). my challenge was for you to make a thread with the exact opposite title of that one (which you clearly didn't do, but whatever)to prove you that the results wouldn't be that much of a landslide.

              comprende?
              Your right I didn't bother to try to comprehend you more. I put up the 24 day option vs the 14 day option and let the forums decide. If you want something done your way, do it yourself.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by flexxx145 View Post
                Your right I didn't bother to try to comprehend you more. I put up the 24 day option vs the 14 day option and let the forums decide. If you want something done your way, do it yourself.
                yeah np, i don't really care too much about the issue, honestly, i'm not on any of those fckers' payroll or anything, i just wanted to state my observation, but beyond that, they're on their own.

                Comment


                  #9
                  The 14 day offer is a compromise of Manny's 24 day compromise. I think Floyd should have just accepted the 24 days...

                  On the other hand, i see no reason why Pac wouldn't accpet the 14 days...

                  The fight not happening is both fighter's fault!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I want 0 days. You want 30 days. Cut that ***** in the middle. Seems like a sensible compromise to me. This really is beating a dead horse though.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP