You make a statement but have nothing to back it up with and are now asking me to counter your BS with facts. Whatever, man.
First of all, a few days matter. Second, Olympians are tested right up to their event and after.
I was at the Olympics in Vancouver. CBC was handing out pamphlets on drug testing and the side effects of taking drugs and blood transfusions etc. That's where I got my facts from. I assumed they were facts. They said the blood is taken up to 30 days prior to the events and immediately after, and that urine is random throughout. I tried looking it up through google but unfortunately I am having a hard time finding anything specific. So if the actual information being given out AT THE OLYMPICS is false, please provide me with facts stating that they do BLOOD tests throughout the games before events. BLOOD tests were said to be given 30 DAYS PRIOR to the event, immediately AFTERWARDS, and urine tests were random THROUGHOUT the actual event.
I do know for a fact (as does anybody who follows sports) that 10% of cheaters actually get caught. Many athletes don't get nailed until long afterwards (Marion Jones etc.) or not at all (Lance Armstrong, Usain Bolt etc.) That's being randomly tested all year. The masking agents are always ahead of the testing due to the laws placed to protect the athlete/cheater. Pacquiao did not have to agree to any testing, the sanctioning bodies have their own rules and govern the sport. This thread wasn't about if Pacquiao is clean or not (I think he is, but it doesn't matter). It's about a boxer (Floyd) thinking he's bigger than the sport and being the only boxer in the world that won't fight Pacquiao, and demands said tests.
Last edited by FaustoGeraci; 04-06-2010, 11:24 AM.
False on every count. Sheesh. Listen, before we start this debate go do some research. Are you making this stuff up? Because you're so off on your points that it's hilarious.
I'm tired of ignorant fans making statements like this one. Anyone want to take over for me?
Are you just like completely talking out your ass? It sure as hell smells like it.
Your lack of knowledge is amazing.
Damn, instead of posting ad hominems, why not you two try to refute what the TS said point-by-point.
The TS has laid some solid arguments right there and as usual you, as *****s, just outright dismiss everything he said without even countering one solid reasoning on the facts.
No wonder majority thinks most of the *****s are indeed ****** and just ****sucking everything related to floyd...
I was at the Olympics in Vancouver. CBC was handing out pamphlets on drug testing and the side effects of taking drugs and blood transfusions etc. That's where I got my facts from. I assumed they were facts. They said the blood is taken up to 30 days prior to the events and immediately after, and that urine is random throughout. I tried looking it up through google but unfortunately I am having a hard time finding anything specific.
I do know for a fact (as does anybody who follows sports) that 10% of cheaters actually get caught. Many athletes don't get nailed until long afterwards (Marion Jones etc.) or not at all (Lance Armstrong, Usain Bolt etc.) That's being randomly tested all year. The masking agents are always ahead of the testing due to the laws placed to protect the athlete/cheater. Pacquiao did not have to agree to any testing, the sanctioning bodies have their own rules and govern the sport. This thread wasn't about if Pacquiao is clean or not (I think he is, but it doesn't matter). It's about a boxer (Floyd) thinking he's bigger than the sport and being the only boxer in the world that won't fight Pacquiao, and demands said tests.
Your second paragraph is all opinion which I will ignore because I disagree and find it laughable. As for your first paragraph, I've already responded. But you don't have to believe me. Do some quick research right now while you're on a computer. But after all the comments you made, I expect you to be a man and come back on here and admit it.
Your second paragraph is all opinion which I will ignore because I disagree and find it laughable. As for your first paragraph, I've already responded. But you don't have to believe me. Do some quick research right now while you're on a computer. But after all the comments you made, I expect you to be a man and come back on here and admit it.
Haha do you like ****ting on yourself? Are you some kind of freak?
The second paragraph had some opinion in it. However, it also contained facts (habitual cheaters like Marion Jones and her boyfriend were never caught by the drug testing yet confessed to cheating throughout the games and their careers). Those are two of MANY. What you find laughable in there is beyond me but like usual you keep it bottled up because you really don't have **** to say.
As for the first paragraph, I told you what was being passed out at the actual Olympic games and the facts stated in the pamphlets. I then stated as to how I could not find anything specific online to refute the information I was given AT THE ACTUAL OLYMPIC GAMES. Now you respond with this? The bottom line is you haven't produced one shred of evidence, even a link, to refute statements made by pamphlets at THE ACTUAL OLYMPIC GAMES. So until you do, continue to come off with your condescending ''holier than thou"' attitude and make a fool of yourself. Í'll trust the information given by the IOC at their ACTUAL OLYMPIC EVENTS.
Haha do you like ****ting on yourself? Are you some kind of freak?
The second paragraph had some opinion in it. However, it also contained facts (habitual cheaters like Marion Jones and her boyfriend were never caught by the drug testing yet confessed to cheating throughout the games and their careers). Those are two of MANY. What you find laughable in there is beyond me but like usual you keep it bottled up because you really don't have **** to say.
As for the first paragraph, I told you what was being passed out at the actual Olympic games and the facts stated in the pamphlets. I then stated as to how I could not find anything specific online to refute the information I was given AT THE ACTUAL OLYMPIC GAMES. Now you respond with this? The bottom line is you haven't produced one shred of evidence, even a link, to refute statements made by pamphlets at THE ACTUAL OLYMPIC GAMES. So until you do, continue to come off with your condescending ''holier than thou"' attitude and make a fool of yourself. Í'll trust the information given by the IOC at their ACTUAL OLYMPIC EVENTS.
Damn, instead of posting ad hominems, why not you two try to refute what the TS said point-by-point.
The TS has laid some solid arguments right there and as usual you, as *****s, just outright dismiss everything he said without even countering one solid reasoning on the facts.
No wonder majority thinks most of the *****s are indeed ****** and just ****sucking everything related to floyd...
It's sad. They come into a thread I made and demand I provide facts which I already have. Then they demand I provide their own arguments with some ammunition because they clearly have none. Hilarious.
Comment