Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An Unbiased Look At Pacquiao-Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
    Since when does Floyd need Pac? Floyd is already an ATG. Been one.

    Mosley is a better fighter then anyone Pac has ever fought.
    Not a 37 year old Mosley he is not.....

    No one is dis*****g that Floyd is an ATG, I will be the first to agree with this but that wasn't my point. As usual your limited intelligence shows and it seems you have comprehension problems.

    I never said Floyd isn't an ATG, I said his legacy would be damaged by this.

    It's the same as if Tyson never fought Holyfield or Leonard never fought Hagler. The question would always be there as to whether or not he could beat that fighter.

    See, boxing is like college football, you are only as good as your strength of schedule.

    Comment


      Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
      Since when does Floyd need Pac? Floyd is already an ATG. Been one.

      Mosley is a better fighter then anyone Pac has ever fought.
      No he isn't. Morales and Barrera are way higher on the ATG list than Mosley has and will ever be.

      Barrera >>>> Mosley (and I actuallly like Shane and I can't stand Marco)

      Comment


        Im still waiting for a link.... Some kind of source... Even a picture of this mysterious pamphlet.

        Comment


          Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
          Actually the USADA never came up with the 14 day window, it was Team Mayweather. I like how you tell someone to grow up after telling them to shut the **** up over a keyboard. Look in the mirror.
          Yeah, lets pretend Pacquiao agreed to what they USADA required. As if negotiations began with a 14 day cut off date. Mirror my a**.

          Comment


            Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
            That is funny, you thinking that Pacquiao fought the same Cotto that Shane did is HILARIOUS.
            What was the difference? That up to that point Cotto hadn't really been exposed as being overrated yet? They looked the same to me, and Pacquiao would of always done that to whatever version of Cotto you want to bring up. Styles make fights.

            Comment


              Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
              Yeah, lets pretend Pacquiao agreed to what they USADA required. As if negotiations began with a 14 day cut off date. Mirror my a**.
              No they actually got talked up to 14 days. Team Mayweather originally wanted up until the fight. Hence my point that Team Mayweather were in charge of the cut off date which you tried to deny. Thanks again.

              Comment


                Originally posted by FaustoGeraci View Post
                No they actually got talked up to 14 days. Team Mayweather originally wanted up until the fight. Hence my point that Team Mayweather were in charge of the cut off date which you tried to deny. Thanks again.
                Team Mayweather originally wanted up until the fight? Are you saying that Team Mayweather told the USADA what to do?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  We know. And William Joppy beat Roberto Duran.

                  Blanket statements are so funny.
                  So Mosley was past his prime when he fought Cotto but not now? Okay.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by cuauhtemoc1496 View Post
                    Not a 37 year old Mosley he is not.....

                    No one is dis*****g that Floyd is an ATG, I will be the first to agree with this but that wasn't my point. As usual your limited intelligence shows and it seems you have comprehension problems.

                    I never said Floyd isn't an ATG, I said his legacy would be damaged by this.

                    It's the same as if Tyson never fought Holyfield or Leonard never fought Hagler. The question would always be there as to whether or not he could beat that fighter.

                    See, boxing is like college football, you are only as good as your strength of schedule.

                    I disagree. Wouldnt you favor Shane over everyone that Pac has ever fought? Including the Post Marg Cotto?

                    No you must have limited intelligence because YOU said "Floyd needs Pac". I just made the point that he DOESN'T and you agreed sow which is it?

                    When you say this:


                    "It's the same as if Tyson never fought Holyfield or Leonard never fought Hagler. The question would always be there as to whether or not he could beat that fighter."

                    Doesnt that also apply to Pacquiao? I mean its obvious who the elephant in his room is. Its Floyd Mayweather Jr.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      Why would anyone use EPO then?
                      For extreme endurance....which is why is is used in sports like Cycling etc. That type of endurance is by no means needed in boxing.LOL...you pretty slick, by answering my question with another question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP