i dont care what anyone says..if floyd beats mosley convincingly or even T/KO's him ...hes better than ali ...i dont see how anyone can argue against his resume at that point...
Nope and no where near best of all time. This fight could have happened some years but did not. mosley was put in , no other option was available. For the first time ever, mayweather is in a fight he could lose.
Pacquiao is top 25-30 right now, Floyd is top 45-55.
Not on my list.
Pac is not 25-30.
He aint even fought the best fighter of his era yet. Its disrespectful to guys who have Foreman, Hagler, Hearns, etc...Let there careers finish first. Pacs in his prime he loses to Floyd he drops.
He aint even fought the best fighter of his era yet. Its disrespectful to guys who have Foreman, Hagler, Hearns, etc...Let there careers finish first. Pacs in his prime he loses to Floyd he drops.
Pac wont fight Floyd, Mosely(Roach has already said Mosely is too good to fight without weight draining him), or anyone else who actually posses a threat.
Floyd barely breaks the top 50 ATG list, and Pac isn't on it at all.
Pac wont fight Floyd, Mosely(Roach has already said Mosely is too good to fight without weight draining him), or anyone else who actually posses a threat.
Floyd barely breaks the top 50 ATG list, and Pac isn't on it at all.
He aint even fought the best fighter of his era yet. Its disrespectful to guys who have Foreman, Hagler, Hearns, etc...Let there careers finish first. Pacs in his prime he loses to Floyd he drops.
i agree with this.....Pac and Floyd are both Top 50 and its upto them to increase their position by fighting each other......also, the truly great fighters proved that even past their prime they had what it takes.....Ali did it after his exile from boxing, Sugar Ray dominated the middleweights late in his career.....question is, are Pac and May willing to prove themselves past their prime
Comment