Originally posted by prsi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miguel Cotto: "Pacquiao Picked The Wrong Opponent, Fighter"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Postuhh no , the ones talking all the smack are pac and his goons,at some point cotto has to say something in his own defense cotto has been the quiet humble one here not pac or his team.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Postuhh no , the ones talking all the smack are pac and his goons,at some point cotto has to say something in his own defense cotto has been the quiet humble one here not pac or his team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by p4p-champ View PostManny has no business fighting for a welterweight 147lb title at 145lbs....but he does smile a lot so we should be lenient. Heck he is so nice we should just create a catch weight title belt for him too.
Originally posted by prsi View PostPathetic as usual!!!!
But guess what, Cotto already lost to a former 106 lbs, yeah because back in the 90's he lost to Ivan Calderon when Cotto was a former 106lbs also. Oh wait a minute wasn't Pacquiao a 106lbs also in the 90's.
So those Pacquiao has any business losing to a former 106lber in Cotto????
Dude accept the fact that the 106lb figure was in the past of both fighters and everybody grew up, well I take that back, everybody but you and your intelligence!!!!
bottom line cotto is the bigger guy and shouldn't lose to someone coming up in weight. that's shameful.
Comment
-
ok u guys, u guys know so much about boxing!!! ok, maybe. but i will put something in ur mind. what happen to Paul Malignaggi? he is fast just like paquito and what happen? cotto beat him and to all u guys who like paquito and think paquito is going to win this fight (good luck) i see him loosing in 12 round. if paquito is all that great of boxer, he should made the fight at 147 not at 145.
Comment
-
Originally posted by prsi View PostPathetic as usual!!!!
But guess what, Cotto already lost to a former 106 lbs, yeah because back in the 90's he lost to Ivan Calderon when Cotto was a former 106lbs also. Oh wait a minute wasn't Pacquiao a 106lbs also in the 90's.
So those Pacquiao has any business losing to a former 106lber in Cotto????
Dude accept the fact that the 106lb figure was in the past of both fighters and everybody grew up, well I take that back, everybody but you and your intelligence!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elotero View PostYou give Paq the edge? What edge? What edge can you give Paq here? Im very curious to hear this...
Who has more wins at Welterweight? Who has fought the better opposition at Welterweight? Who has the better chin at welterweight? Who has more KO's at Welterweight? Who has fought and overcome more diverse styles over the last 3 years at Welterweight?
I tell you what.. I've seen Miguel fight runners, slick boxers, volume punchers, speedsters, brawlers etc. Add in his amateur and Olympic experience and you start to get the picture that there really isn't a style he hasn't fought and defeated yet.
I dont need to mention how blown up the wins over DLH and Hatton are.
Of course this is boxing and anything can happen but to say that Paq has any edge at all (beside being a betting favorite) is just ridiculous.
Of course Cotto is not Hatton.. and not even ODLH! Every great fighters that had fallen into the hands of Pac have their own stories! ODLH when exposed by Pac suddenly became weightdrained after the fight, and Hatton suddenly became overrated! Just wondering what becomes Cotto just in case Pac destroys him?
BTW, i want to take all your points by betting Pac over Cotto.. interested? PM me.
Comment
Comment