Why are people saying Dirrell hurt Froch?

[MJ406]

Froch was on ***** street twice, Direll was never that hurt.

not true. Dirrell was holding on quite a bit in the 6th and 8th rounds after Froch landed some solid shots

[baracuda]

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of **** again?

Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement.

dirrel caught him with a couple of good shots but froch is a tough mofo.........dirrel just could'nt hurt him....

[Shadows]

not true. Dirrell was holding on quite a bit in the 6th and 8th rounds after Froch landed some solid shots

I thought that was just him trying to spoil and smother Froch's attack.

IMO the only time Froch stunned Dirrell was when he caught him with a left hook. Can't remember the round though.

[MJ406]

I think it was the 8th where Froch landed the hook

and come on I know Dirrell was using the holding to spoil tactics

but at the same time after almost every big shot by Froch Dirrell was holding ...even in that 10th round clip fair amount of holding by Andre, leading to the point dediction

but his holding makes it hard to tell how much Dirrell's hurt.

he gets hit big and your saying it's to spoil tactics?

what if he's recovering?

[Shadows]

he gets hit big and your saying it's to spoil tactics?

what if he's recovering?

The thing is, I didn't see Froch land much at all. At least nothing big.

Like I said that was the only time I remember Dirrell being stunned.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Dirrell buzzed Froch with a left hook in the 10th. He wasnt badly hurt seeing as he was throwing punches 3 seconds later.

[Cle-Venger]

Didnt read this thread or what people are saying, but my unbiased opinion, because abraham is my pick to win it. Froch did not get hurt, sorry guys. He got hit hard, but at no point did I see wobble. Live I thought I saw a wobble, then they showed a different angle of slow motion, and there is no wobble, but not only that, he backed up because he was getting landed on hard, but seconds into he charged at him seemingly un stunned.

[kocface]

Someone upload it. At no point did I think Froch was in trouble. I remember Froch busting Dirrell's nose though. The guy didn't want to fight.

frochs knees buckled twice!!!!! one from a straight and from an uppercut in the 11 n 12 wat fight did u watch?? they took a point from dirrell for holding but when froch does a 3 hit rabbit punch combo they dont even warn him, they even replayed it, dirrells head is down n froch is chopping away lol. Dirrell could have finished froch if he had more experience, he never jumped on froch when he hurt him

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Just watched the Showtime version, the lead commentator was a bit OTT. Dirrell threw a left hook in the 11th with deflected off Froch's right glove and he starts screaming "Froch is in trouble!!"......errr no.

He did buzz him in the 10th though

[patpatpts]

froch was buzz