Why are people saying Dirrell hurt Froch?

[Weebler I]

I watched it on UK commentary and they didn't make an issue of it, fortunately I have eyes and I saw Froch's legs look like my spaghetti pomodoro from last night.

see that's what I thought. I think the US commentators are dying to look for weakness in UK fighters and fk with US fans heads.

[Dorian]

Someone has that gif in their sig. Froch was wobbled.

[drinkxerox]

the american broadcasters were unbiased - in fact if there was any bias i'd say it was towards Froch

[Uturn]

Froch wasn't hurt atall. Had they engaged Dirrell would have had his ass whooped.

[Pugilistic?/a>]

He made Froch's legs go in the 10th round.

I believe it was near the end of the round.

[Steve Harvey]

Is it the US commentators filling your head full of **** again?

Dirrell didn't hurt Froch once, the man himself said he could've boxed another 12 rounds like that such was the lack of engagement.

Everyone who watched the fight knows Dirrel hurt Froch and Froch had to be on the ropes and was ready to go.He obviously recovered and he could have gone another 12 rounds missing the way he was but still getting hit

[Steve Harvey]

Froch wasn't hurt atall. Had they engaged Dirrell would have had his ass whooped.

What's your definition of boxing and what's this engagement stuff u keep talking about?
Dirrel engaged Froch from the first round and was hitting Froch everytime he wanted.

[Leo Mayweather]

Froch was fooked in the 10th and still hadnt recovered in the 11th! Dirrell should of finished that fool off, think he lacks killer instinct though shame cause the boys got some skills

[Pullcounter]

Dirrell wobbled Froch... its academic.

[S H O B O X]

froch was wobbled once in the fight although ive heard people on the forum erroneously say that it was two or three times which is absolute bs.