Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

At 147-154, Prime for Prime, how would Floyd Mayweather Jr fair against these five Pro Boxers he beat in the past?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #241
    Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

    There is no talking rational sense to that idiot, the guy is low intelligence and there is no getting past that.
    How did this become a debate

    Comment

      #242
      Originally posted by Haka View Post

      At this point you have not responded to post #211 so I have to assume you agree with post #211.
      As we have shown you assume so many things wrong, what does a few more matter?

      Comment

        #243
        Originally posted by Haka View Post

        Yes but we are talking in terms of the best fighters among the list of:
        - Bradley, JMM, Maidana, Ortiz, Guerrero, Berto
        I guess...........
        You're making Timmy out to be someone he's not.

        Comment

          #244
          Originally posted by Haka View Post

          More deflection.
          More truth which you cant face.

          Comment

            #245
            Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post

            I guess...........
            You're making Timmy out to be someone he's not.
            Just be aware that nothing that you have stated disputes anything in post #211 which is generated based on cold hard facts.

            Comment

              #246
              Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

              More truth which you cant face.
              You are talking chit and the moment you are wrong you do everything in your power to shyte up the thread to bury the evidence.

              Comment

                #247
                Originally posted by Haka View Post

                You are talking chit and the moment you are wrong you do everything in your power to shyte up the thread to bury the evidence.
                Here you you go with your version of right and wrong, didnt you say . You woudn't know if Bradley were to be less effective. Maybe Floyd wouldve been less effective. Nobody knows.

                So when you say NOBODY knows that's excluding you right lol

                There is no discussion with you, you don't have a point you have a flaky interpretation of a subjective list of circumstances and youre trying to make something concrete, tell in 5 words what is your point?

                You don't have the brain power for this which is why you jump all over the place, refusing to answer anything, you really have no clue how messed up you are.

                Comment

                  #248
                  Originally posted by Haka

                  In the twisted depths of human folly, the words of Roadblock serve as a grotesque reflection of intellectual cowardice. Rather than confronting the uncomfortable truths of the argument, he retreats into the shadows of baseless psychological attacks, fabricating distortions to protect his fragile ego. This is not the voice of reason, but of a mind unwilling to confront the cold, indifferent reality. Roadblock becomes a symbol of the human tendency to reject truth, preferring comforting delusions over the harsh light of logic. His argument is not an engagement with facts, but an evasion, a desperate flight from reason into self-deception.
                  Just answer a question its really that simple and you not capable, go through the thread or any convo Ive had with you and point where you answered any questions.

                  What is youre point you think you won, come on what is your specific point, fck me you cant even speak for yourself its like a caveman has found that AI will give you whatever you feed it, feed it BS and it will tell you how your BS can add up to a fantasy.

                  Comment

                    #249
                    Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                    Just answer a question its really that simple and you not capable, go through the thread or any convo Ive had with you and point where you answered any questions.

                    What is youre point you think you won, come on what is your specific point, fck me you cant even speak for yourself its like a caveman has found that AI will give you whatever you feed it, feed it BS and it will tell you how your BS can add up to a fantasy.
                    1) If Bradley were to be #1 or #2 in terms of prime opponents of Floyd resume
                    2) Bradley is best of JMM, Maidana, Ortiz, Guerrero, Berto
                    3) Bradley completely ignored

                    What makes you think any of the mentioned fight against

                    Miguel Cotto (32-0, 26 KOs) from 2008.
                    Canelo Alvarez (51-1-2, 35 KOs) from 2017-2018. (If Alvarez made the "155" catchweight he used constantly)
                    Shane Mosley (35-0, 32 KOs) from 2000.
                    Oscar De La Hoya (30-0, 24 KOs) from 1999.
                    Manny Pacquiao (54-3-2) from 2011.​
                    Based on postulates 1,2,3 how do you entertain the thought that these fights could ever have taken place ?
                    w1cked w1cked likes this.
                    • Likes 1

                    Comment

                      #250
                      Originally posted by Haka View Post

                      1) If Bradley were to be #1 or #2 in terms of prime opponents of Floyd resume
                      2) Bradley is best of JMM, Maidana, Ortiz, Guerrero, Berto
                      3) Bradley completely ignored

                      What makes you think any of the mentioned fight against



                      Based on postulates 1,2,3 how do you entertain the thought that these fights could ever have taken place ?
                      What is your point? Numb nuts, we go no further until you say what your specific point is, you don't have one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP