Comments Thread For: Mayweather Aims To Produce More Champions, Has No Interest in Exhibition Offers

[Boxing-1013]

name 10 guys that Golovkin faced who are as good as Kambosos


this will be HILARIOUS


kid... YOU SAID THAT HYPEKIN WAS ON THE SAME LEVEL AS DURAN... and nothing in the post above justifies that ridiculous foolery


as I have told you MANY times, there is ONLY one criteria for greatness... WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how... nothing else matters


you absolute muppet... you are equating Hypekin with Duran, because Hypekin never lost to the scrubs and no-hopers that he continually selected... and you are giving no thought whatsoever to the ONLY criteria that counts


Golovkin does not have a signature win, he does not even have a career-defining fight... his 2nd best win is David " c-class " Lemieux you fool... Duran was a cold-blooded killer, and is one of the greatest fighters of all time... Hypekin's opponent selection was timid compared to Duran's


you are in the wrong place son, I'm sure you only ended up here because you got lost when you were looking for a video-game store






...

People lose to 2nd class fighters all the time. To pretend otherwise is too dumb to even debate about. Just study some boxing history before you speak such garbage lol.

GGG never lost against about 15 of those guys. That is impressive to me. Your criteria for greatness, is your opinion. Good for you. Stay consistent with it, if nothing else.

For me, a big criteria is how you fare over the course of your career - similar to judging a sports team to how they fared over a whole season. If you can always take care of business when you are supposed to, and have no stylistic matchup problems, it is very impressive to me.

I'd think that would be very impressive to anyone. But keep doing whatever it is you're doing. You are a very odd, emotional guy.

We don't really know how good Kambosos. If you average him, Cruz, and JoJo, they are no better than the average of Ouma, Rubio, Stevens, Monroe, Rosado, Proksa, Macklin, Brook, Murray, Lemieux, Ishida, Kamil, Vanes, Geale. That's 14 guys, not including Danny, Sergei, and Canelo twice.

GGG dominated and KOed all 14 of those guys. That impresses me, to never slip up in that many fights, against guys who could give you trouble. Never happened for GGG. It impressed me. Not sure what you get so upset about over it.

Like I said, compare it to anyone else all-time, and very few can match that sort of record. Cry about it if you want, wah wah you little fu.cking baby lol

[Boxing-1013]

that is a total lie... link ?

and what a fkn ass-clown you are kid... FACT: Golovkin made that 164 catchweight demand on Ward, and it killed the fight

Bullshltkin KNEW that Ward could not make 164, just like everyone else knew it... and he KNEW that catchweight demand would kill the fight

you are not " consistent "... you are just Hypekin's little butt-monkey






...

"Floyd Mayweather Jr. recently gave a pretty good reason recently why a fight between him and WBC junior middleweight champion Saul “Canelo” Alvarez is an impossibility, saying that he himself fights at right at the weight limit for his welterweight bouts, whereas Canelo rehydrates up to 170 pounds."

What kind of an idiot would think that catchweight was done for any reason other than Floyd wanted to do it, because he felt it gave him an edge in the fight, lol.

You are a complete loser man. You really are. You need help.

Your inability to reason things out, it's a shock that you are able to survive in society to be honest. I would think you would be best suited to a padded room somewhere, but then I wonder how you get such regular access to a computer and internet.

They don't have those at insane asylums do they?

[aboutfkntime]

People lose to 2nd class fighters all the time. To pretend otherwise is too dumb to even debate about. Just study some boxing history before you speak such garbage lol.

GGG never lost against about 15 of those guys. That is impressive to me. Your criteria for greatness, is your opinion. Good for you. Stay consistent with it, if nothing else.

For me, a big criteria is how you fare over the course of your career - similar to judging a sports team to how they fared over a whole season. If you can always take care of business when you are supposed to, and have no stylistic matchup problems, it is very impressive to me.

I'd think that would be very impressive to anyone. But keep doing whatever it is you're doing. You are a very odd, emotional guy.

We don't really know how good Kambosos. If you average him, Cruz, and JoJo, they are no better than the average of Ouma, Rubio, Stevens, Monroe, Rosado, Proksa, Macklin, Brook, Murray, Lemieux, Ishida, Kamil, Vanes, Geale. That's 14 guys, not including Danny, Sergei, and Canelo twice.

GGG dominated and KOed all 14 of those guys. That impresses me, to never slip up in that many fights, against guys who could give you trouble. Never happened for GGG. It impressed me. Not sure what you get so upset about over it.

Like I said, compare it to anyone else all-time, and very few can match that sort of record. Cry about it if you want, wah wah you little fu.cking baby lol

oh, right... I remember you now

you are the dumb shlthead who posted this wall of ******ity...



thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....

I just made a thread about specifically why people rate Canelo's resume as better than GGG's...and I laid out my case as to why I rate GGG's better.....
//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=820918

----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one

I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them.....
//krikya360.com/forums/s...820918&page=10

----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

never had a slip up against quality opposition, and he faced probably more of them than almost any other fighter in history...
//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=824905

----------------------------

thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda

I just never really saw the skills from him..... if he was born in a different country I don't think he would have been looked at much differently than Bika Barrera or Miranda etc.....
//krikya360.com/forums/s...2#post19903762

----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins

Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh.....
//krikya360.com/forums/s...821123&page=20

----------------------------

thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs

Lemieux, Murray pretty clearly around the level of SD Canelo Jacobs...
//krikya360.com/forums/s...9#post20112309

----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....

Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale.....
//krikya360.com/forums/s...820918&page=16

----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....

Boxing1013 attempted to remove defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression, as official scoring criteria..... to justify why he thinks Golovkin beat Canelo in their rematch..... but, had NO IDEA that Steve Weisfeld was AN OFFICIAL JUDGE at the Canelo/Golovkin rematch..... and Weisfeld scored that fight for Canelo looool
//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=818903

-------------------------------

proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...

I'll also tell you how I score them...generally give a 'full point' for a good hard clean shot...and a 'half point' for a punch that is a scoring blow but isn't necessarily super hard or clean.
//krikya360.com/forums/s...3#post20372893

-------------------------------

thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume

resume wise it is interesting that one dominated with decision wins over good fighters, and one with KO wins over good fighters...both having the same number of wins, and about the same number of good wins.
//krikya360.com/forums/s...d.php?t=843266

-------------------------------

thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech

I would even say Geale in his prime was a better fighter than Fenech
//krikya360.com/forums/s...=843266&page=2

-------------------------------

has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness

I think you are once again another on here who fails to realize that what makes 99% of great fighters great - is beating 9/10 or even 10/10 of the good solid pros they faced...most greats only face 1-2 or maybe 3 other greats in their primes/best weights, and usually they have mixed results there.
//krikya360.com/forums/s...=843266&page=2

-------------------------------

thinks that Golovkin is the same level as Duran
[QUOTE=Boxing_1013;20474696]GGG is comparable to Duran levels-wise for me...
//krikya360.com/forums/s...=843918&page=4








...

[Jab jab boom]

that is what happened

he also offered Mayweather a catchweight just prior to the negotiation, and Ellerbe jumped on it

it was still lame and unnecessary imo, but it had no impact on the fight






...

in what is a rare occurrence on this site, I actually agree with you.

[elfag]

Canelo wasnt even the same fighter. Everyone will remember when logan paul a youtuber was kicking floyds ass

logan paul won more rounds vs common opponent floyd mayweather than canelo.

lmao imagine logan paul out performing you

[djtmal]

I thought the exhibitions were no risk money driven ventures even those are too risky now.

[Boxing-1013]

[QUOTE=aboutfkntime;n31218022]








oh, right... I remember you now

you are the dumb shlthead who posted this wall of ******ity...



thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....


----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....


----------------------------

thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins


----------------------------

thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs


----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....


----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....


-------------------------------

proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...


-------------------------------

thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume


-------------------------------

thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech


-------------------------------

has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness


-------------------------------

thinks that Golovkin is the same level as Duran

GGG is comparable to Duran levels-wise for me...
//krikya360.com/forums/s...=843918&page=4








...

I've given my reasons for why I rate GGG. I have a consistent criteria. It is not unique to him. If you disagree, that's fine.

As I said, the 3 lightweights struggling, and one losing, vs B or C level fighters this past weekend, should help show why I rate GGG very highly.

You can disagree if you want, but you should at least understand where I am coming from there.

[aboutfkntime]

in what is a rare occurrence on this site, I actually agree with you.

you're learning






...

[aboutfkntime]

[QUOTE=Boxing-1013;n31218460]

oh, right... I remember you now

you are the dumb shlthead who posted this wall of ******ity...



thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....


----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....


----------------------------

thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins


----------------------------

thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs


----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....


----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....


-------------------------------

proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...


-------------------------------

thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume


-------------------------------

thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech


-------------------------------

has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness


-------------------------------

thinks that Golovkin is the same level as Duran


I've given my reasons for why I rate GGG. I have a consistent criteria. It is not unique to him. If you disagree, that's fine.

As I said, the 3 lightweights struggling, and one losing, vs B or C level fighters this past weekend, should help show why I rate GGG very highly.

You can disagree if you want, but you should at least understand where I am coming from there.

your reasons are fanboy nonsense... as I have told you many times, there is only one criteria for greatness

the comments above prove... 1) you know very little about this sport... 2) your perception of Golovkin is irrational, delusional, hero-worship

get help






...

[Boxing-1013]

[QUOTE=aboutfkntime;n31218932]

your reasons are fanboy nonsense... as I have told you many times, there is only one criteria for greatness

the comments above prove... 1) you know very little about this sport... 2) your perception of Golovkin is irrational, delusional, hero-worship

get help






...

I disagree. I think my criteria - how you do overall against the non-elite guys - is very important. It shows an elite level imo to never struggle against 10+ guys like that. That is the bulk of any fighter's resume anyway (fights against solid/non-elite boxers), and very few do it as well as GGG in those fights.

There is stuff to critique him for as well. Just keep it within reason and you probably will find me joining in with it.