Great article. Davis won't fight anyone, Garcia is a kid dealing with mental issues, Lopez fought Kambosos kicking and screaming and lost. Kambosos has the belts now and Haney says he wants to fight him so the only fight that can be made realistically is Haney and Kambosos. Loma is always there but he is almost 35 now will be interesting to see how he fair at an advanced age.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Modern Lightweight Princes Wake Up Echoes of Yesterday's Kings
Collapse
-
-
-
Perfect case scenario........Showtime approaches KAMbo and offers him a 2 fight deal. FIGHT#1: can be held DOWN UNDER in front of 80k screaming Aussies. His opponent can be that little nasal voice pervert Rolly Romero and on the undercard Tim Tszyu v Tony Harrison. Rolly can play the villian of the big mouth American and I don't think KAMbo would have that much of a problem with him. Harrison will probably beat the chit out of Tim but just for chits and giggles we'll say he wins. FIGHT#2: Super duper PPV in Vegas Tank v KAMbo for all the glory with the undercard Jermell v Tim (provided they get through their respective fights). DOPE SON!!!
Comment
-
These fighters can be yapped about but can we all get down to business? Thanks: What the **** will it take to get Crawford & Spence in a ring? Other worthwhile matches don’t require a rocket science degree: Fury vs Usyk- WTF let’s go! While we’re at it ya think those top-shelf guy’s teams from Jr Middle to LT Heavy can display some competitive spirit as opposed to looking up their asses (in their wallets)? … Aaahhh that felt good; now it’s time to watch Money play games with Logan Paul to practice pretending as if we should be excited.BDBoxing likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Billevans View PostMaybe my memory is wrong and I welcome a correction but I don't recall the four kings having and older smaller guy who could beat all of them. Teo did best Loma but I'm not sure a rematch would have gone well for teo.BDBoxing likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by PredatorStyle View PostI anyone still talking about 4 kings? That's ******. You can't have a Four kings if the most promising King lost to an unheralded fighter and won't fight again at LW and the most famous king is not fighting for psychological reasons. The concept is meaningless if the 4 names are constantly changing.
If Lomachenko regains the belts then he is the king of his era and that's it. There was never a four kings.
why? Because they did exactly that, fought the best out there, THEE very best.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by micky1971 View Postyou miss the point my friend, it’s about the best fighting the best to become kings. THEE four kings all fought one another and all had wins and losses to each other but their still kings.
why? Because they did exactly that, fought the best out there, THEE very best.
Comment
Comment