Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Caleb Plant: I'm Vaccinated Because I Don't Want This Moment Against Canelo To Slip By

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    There many forms of “vaccines.” People are skeptical about mRNA but the technology isn’t new. Every turn of century there must be new breakthroughs in medical science.

    there wouldn’t be “long term” effects from the mRNA vaccine. Long term effects from diseases are when organ have becomes damaged from chronic or acute.

    the best bet is to have had coronavirus virus once or twice, from asymptomatic to mild or maybe even severe, that your body stored the info to fight it again.. of course different types of virus have different survival. Also having info from the vaccine is good too.

    People die from wrongly prescribed drugs to treat diseases or something harmless. Chemicals vs mRNA are different protocols with immunity.

    i hope this is the precursor from mRNA technologies to cure other diseases. There are so many treatments for thousands of things. I for one stand with the team of many that are trying to make a difference. mRNA doesn’t represent COVID-19 vaccinations but for future breakthrough cures. Many cancers are due to commonly known viruses from ***…

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

      Well said.

      I'm guessing you're not vaxxed?
      Nope. Waiting to see what the military is going to do in terms of mandating it. A lot of people are willing to walk and they are already low manned. I'd like to see what the fallout would be should they try to say we have to get it.
      I find it funny how people are so angry about those who are against putting a vaccine without long term trials into their body. They claim you're putting other people's health at risk. If that's the case anytime I see another person doing drugs or eating something unhealthy I should be able to slap it out of their hands because we're so concerned with other people's health and there's a chance they could die how about just letting people decide for themselves whether they want it or not?

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by OldTerry View Post

        The MRNA vaccines like Pfizer and Moderna do not contain the COVID-19 virus (live or dead). How does the vaccine work? The mRNA in the vaccine teaches your cells how to make copies of the spike protein. If you are exposed to the real virus later, your body will recognize it and know how to fight it off.
        Yeah, u get the shot and u end up making a part of the virus, thats introducing the virus to u in my eyes

        plus that only 2 of many other vaccines available

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by champion4ever View Post

          Well as of yesterday; The Pfizer vaccine has now been FDA approved. Which means it's safe.
          Yeah, means it's safe, just like Valdecoxib (Bextra)

          Time on the market: 2001-2005

          Valdecoxib is an NSAID that the FDA later determined worked no better than other NSAID pain medications on the market. The drug was recalled for adverse heart effects including death, heart attack, and stroke, as well as increased risk for serious skin reactions, such as epidermal necrolysis, erythema multiforme, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. To boot, the drug had the potential to cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Yikes!

          Pemoline (Cylert)

          Time on the market: 1975-2010

          This central nervous stimulant was used to treat ADD and ADHD. In 1999, the FDA added a boxed warning due to the drug’s potential to cause liver damage, which was later followed by a recall.

          Bromfenac (Duract)

          Time on the market: 1997-1998

          This pain killer was effective in relieving pain, but it caused 4 deaths, 8 liver transplants, and 12 cases of severe liver damage in the year it was on the market. The drug was labeled to be taken for 10 days at most, but patients were often prescribed longer dosages. All cases of death and liver disease occurred in patients who took the drug for longer than 10 days.

          Levamisole (Ergamisol)

          Time on the market: 1989-2000

          This drug was used to treat patients with worm infestation, rheumatoid arthritis, colon cancer, or breast cancers. It was recalled because it caused neutropenia, agranulocytosis, and thrombotic vasculopathy, leading to retiform purpura—a purple discoloration of the eye that requires surgery.

          Of note, levamisole is still used in the United States to treat animals with worms. It is also cut into street ******* to boost euphoria, which was definitely not its intended use.

          Rofecoxib (Vioxx)

          Time on the market: 1999-2004

          This selective NSAID for arthritis infamously heightened the risks for heart attack and stroke, and was tied to nearly 28,000 heart attacks in the US population between 1999 and 2003. Researchers reported that the drug resulted in an estimated four heart attacks per 1,000 patients who took it. Its manufacturer, Merck, voluntarily pulled it from the market in 2004. In total, this drug was given to more than 20 million people.

          Isotretinoin (Accutane)

          Time on the market: 1982-2009

          This acne medication was recalled due to its increased risk of birth defects, miscarriage, and premature deaths among pregnant women who used it, as well as suicidal ideation and inflammatory bowel disease. The drug's maker, Hoffman-La Roche, pulled Accutane from the US market in 2009. However, generic versions of isotretinoin remain available from various manufacturers. More than 7,000 lawsuits have been filed against Hoffman-La Roche with three verdicts thus far amounting to approximately $10 million each.

          Sibutramine (Meridia)

          Time on the market: 1997-2010

          This appetite suppressant increased heart disease and stroke risk in those who took it. FDA reviewer Dr. David Graham called it “another Vioxx” during a Senate hearing in 2004.

          Terfenadine (Seldane)

          Time on the market: 1985-1998

          This antihistamine was recalled due to fatal heart problems that manifested when taken with either erythromycin or ketoconazole. Although not designated an immediate threat, the drug was eventually pulled because its manufacturer Hoechst Marion Roussel (now Sanofi-Aventis) also sold fexofenadine (Allegra and Allegra-D), which was deemed to be a much safer alternative by the FDA.

          Troglitazone (Rezulin)

          Time on the market: 1997-2000

          Treatment with this antidiabetic and anti-inflammatory drug resulted in 90 cases of liver failure and at least 63 deaths. It also resulted in 35,000 lawsuits against its maker, Parke-Davis/Warner Lambert (now Pfizer).

          Efalizumab (Raptiva)

          Years on the market: 2003-2009

          This biologic was used to treat psoriasis, but was later recalled when it was found to cause progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy—a rare and lethal disease that results in inflammation and damage of the white matter of the brain and central nervous system.


          Lol mo****as trusting criminal pharmaceutical industries is crazy. Pfizer has lawsuits like crazy, same with J & J... Moderna was once Mod RNA, now rebranded, a RNA R&D company that's never made a Pharmaceutical ever . And you can't sue, due to the 1986 VAERS ruling waiving vaccine manufacturers from legal prosecutions... sounds safe. No mandatory any other vaccine by the way... no mandatory EUA vaccines btw either... ever .. ... and it's not a vaccine, its gene therapy.... not sure how it's not illegal to advertise it as a vaccine... as that's false advertising.

          Comment


            #55
            Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that there was asbestos in it's baby powder but did nothing about it.

            Let's put our trust in them, doe.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Smash View Post

              Yeah, u get the shot and u end up making a part of the virus, thats introducing the virus to u in my eyes

              plus that only 2 of many other vaccines available
              No, you don't make the virus. Your immune system is told by the messenger RNA to make antibodies that will latch on to and destroy anything with the virus' tell-tale protein spike.

              Say it again: the vaccine tricks your body's immune system into pre-fabricating the right sort of antibodies to fight the virus.

              If you get exposed to the virus from going about your day to day business, you are then in a better position to stop it in its tracks.

              Far from introducing the virus to your body, the vaccine creates a condition in which your body destroys the virus not creates it.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by Monty Fisto View Post

                No, you don't make the virus. Your immune system is told by the messenger RNA to make antibodies that will latch on to and destroy anything with the virus' tell-tale protein spike.

                Say it again: the vaccine tricks your body's immune system into pre-fabricating the right sort of antibodies to fight the virus.

                If you get exposed to the virus from going about your day to day business, you are then in a better position to stop it in its tracks.

                Far from introducing the virus to your body, the vaccine creates a condition in which your body destroys the virus not creates it.
                from the cdc website

                "mRNA vaccines teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies"

                as far as i know that protein that is made is the spike on the virus, it is that protein, it is then destroyed and antibodies are made, is this incorrect?

                I had to look this up because of your post

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by Smash View Post

                  from the cdc website

                  "mRNA vaccines teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies"

                  as far as i know that protein that is made is the spike on the virus, it is that protein, it is then destroyed and antibodies are made, is this incorrect?

                  I had to look this up because of your post
                  Messenger RNA is prevalent throughout your body and is part of the processes the body uses to maintain itself. It tells your body's cells to string together complex organic compounds (amino acids, some which we produce ourselves, some which we get from food) into proteins. The mRNA vaccines do tell the cells to produce the protein spike which then sparks the immune system into producing antbodies that recognise, latch on to and ultimately destroy anything with the spike.

                  The key part is that an mRNA vaccine tells your cell to make that one tiny part of the virus, as opposed to a conventional vaccine which would have injected what is called an attenuated virus (a weakened version of the virus) into your body. The mRNA never results in the actual virus appearing in your body to stimulate the immune system, just one component part of the virus (i.e. the spike protein).

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines
                    The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours. This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries
                    Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding. The more we learn about the COVID-19 vaccines, the worse they look. In a recent interview with Alex Pierson (above), Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., dropped a shocking truth bomb that immediately went viral, despite being censored by Google.
                    “We made a big mistake,” Bridle says. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” ”

                    This toxin, Bridle notes, can cause cardiovascular damage and infertility — a claim echoed by researchers such as Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., whom I’ve interviewed about these issues.

                    Pfizer Omitted Industry-Standard Safety Studies


                    What’s more, TrialSite News reports6 that Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency [EMA] reveal the company “did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies … as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP).”


                    Neither reproductive toxicity nor genotoxicity (DNA mutation) studies were performed, both of which are considered critical when developing a new drug or vaccine for human use. The problems now surfacing matter greatly, as they significantly alter the risk-benefit analysis underlying the vaccines’ emergency use authorization. As reported by TrialSite News:7
                    Pfizer’s data, however, show this isn’t the case at all. Using mRNA programmed to produce luciferase protein, as well as mRNA tagged with a radioactive label, Pfizer showed that the majority of the mRNA initially remain near the injection site, but within hours become widely distributed within the body.9We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation. ~ Dr. Byram Bridle

                    The mRNA enters your bloodstream and accumulates in a variety of organs, primarily your spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and, in women, the ovaries. The spike protein also travel to your heart, brain and lungs, where bleeding and or blood clots can occur as a result, and is expelled in breast milk.

                    This is a problem, because rather than instructing your muscle cells to produce the spike protein (the antigen that triggers antibody production), spike protein is actually being produced inside your blood vessel walls and various organs, where it can do a great deal of damage.



                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by Monty Fisto View Post



                      The key part is that an mRNA vaccine tells your cell to make that one tiny part of the virus(i.e. the spike protein).
                      which is exactly what i was saying all along!!!!! ^^ a part of the virus LOL

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP