Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

weight class debate as it applies to legacy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #21
    Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
    aw man, i thought you had something legit to talk about, you just wanted to bate.

    i do...i think its a legit topic...yeah i have a rep for ****ting on hopkins for scaling down, but i didn't mention him once and thought the topic was bigger than him and wanted differing opinions...

    Comment

      #22
      Originally posted by djtmal View Post
      should a fighter who enters pro boxing in their natural, or most efficient weight class, lets say for arguments sake, welterweight and after a couple of shaky fights, scales down to say lightweight and is successful beating naturally smaller fighters, be held in the same regard as a fighter who enters boxing as a welterweight and reigns over that division or moves up and dominates competition in higher weight classes?

      discuss....
      No. It's all about who you fight. Garnerin titles in different divisions is always a good thing. But whatever division it is, you gotta beat the best guys there to get the acclaim, unless it's a division way outta your reach. If a fighter downsizes cuz he couldn't physically handle guys where he started, nothin wrong wit that.

      Comment

        #23
        Originally posted by mangler View Post
        No. It's all about who you fight. Garnerin titles in different divisions is always a good thing. But whatever division it is, you gotta beat the best guys there to get the acclaim, unless it's a division way outta your reach. If a fighter downsizes cuz he couldn't physically handle guys where he started, nothin wrong wit that.
        not because he couldn't physically handle the fighters, he just lost

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP