Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

“Fighting Words” – No Mas? Nate Campbell Says: “This Was Different.”

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    I think the fight should have been ruled a no contest but you can tell Nate was looking for a way out.

    Comment


      #42
      Quitter

      Is Campbell showing us an example of a Black Fighter? That Black Fighters are Quitters? He is not in the level of Pacman. He's got no right to face him.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
        Diaz didnt have an internal hemmorage of his eye. Why does everyone keep babbling about the cut? Nate himself told the cutman to forget about the cut, that he had a serious eye problem.

        It seems that no matter how many times you say "it wasnt the cut", people still babble on about "well so and so had a worse cut". I believe it when the govt. says kids graduate these days with about a 7th grade reading level. It sure shows in these boards sometimes.......

        The rules are clear. If an injury due to an accidental foul results in the fight being stopped before 4 rounds, its a NC. Bradley doesnt hit hard enough to bruise a ripe peach, so anyone who thinks a punch caused that eye injury and not the headbutt is simply ******ed.
        Even though I think Nate race baiting Pacquiao was pathetic, showing how desperate he was to win the Pacquiao lottery, and you're a clown for defending him, I think Nate was robbed and he did have a serious eye problem and I don't blame him one bit for thinking the ref ****ed up, because the ref did **** up. And of course he was looking for a way out, he had ****in internal bleeding in his eye, ****. What the hell do yall that are criticizing Nate want, damn.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by dadd View Post
          next fight nate campbell vs. victor ortiz

          battle of the quiters!!
          Apparently you didn't read the whole article because morons like you clearly are who Campbell was talking about: “Real talk here: I’ll fight through cuts all day long and twice on Sunday. But this was different. And these same people who want to talk ****, well they are the first ones to write you off anyways, so I don’t much care what they think. Five years from now, if I were stumbling around with a white cane and a Seeing Eye dog, where would they be? I’ll tell you where: They’d still be on the Internet talking **** about someone else.”

          Comment


            #45
            sure

            i saw the figth no way cambell won the second round i guess if you are a not a figther you cant see whats going on in the ring please quit the excuses stop talking about it figth him again or just retire if you cant take it anymore thank you for the past figths and have a nice life

            Comment


              #46
              Funny how people criticize a professional fighter and wont get in the ring themselves. The guy was butted end of story, who are we to say he can see clearly when he says he sees spots its his eyes not ours.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by raabd View Post
                So robert guerrero quits cause he claimed he couldn't see (as campbell did) and you label him a quitter but campbell isn't? Which is it?
                did a blood vessel in guerro's eye burst like nate??? was he seeing spots???

                the devil is in the details!!!!

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by Matt Marvelous View Post
                  No way does this joker deserve a rematch. He didn't wanna fight. End of story. He got cut, got frustrated and said "**** this, I'm not fighting like this". It was obvious from his reaction and demanding his corner stop it. Bradley's speed made him look old, Campbell was getting put away in under 10 rounds and he knew it. **** Campbell, his reign was mediocre anyway. It's Bradley's time.
                  I agree with you. I saw the fight and Campbell had a look
                  on his face that didn't say he was hurt, it just said that he
                  a lil discouraged. After they wiped the blood away that cut
                  never bled again AND even his corner was looking confused.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by bucktoof View Post
                    Even though I think Nate race baiting Pacquiao was pathetic, showing how desperate he was to win the Pacquiao lottery, and you're a clown for defending him, I think Nate was robbed and he did have a serious eye problem and I don't blame him one bit for thinking the ref ****ed up, because the ref did **** up. And of course he was looking for a way out, he had ****in internal bleeding in his eye, ****. What the hell do yall that are criticizing Nate want, damn.
                    Until we see medical proof that he had blood behind his
                    eye then I will believe he was discouraged and wanted
                    out of the fight to live and fight another day. When the
                    decision was announced he didn't care about his eye
                    at all, he was more trying to get a NC. If my eye was
                    messed up to the point of seeing white spots I would
                    have left the ring immediately. His vision didn't seem
                    much effected after the decision was read.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                      did a blood vessel in guerro's eye burst like nate??? was he seeing spots???

                      the devil is in the details!!!!
                      Nate Campbell quit.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP