Maybe i missed it in the article but where is the medical report that says he had blood behind his eye.
Hospitals do not normally release their medical records, and the idea that Campbell should ask them to make an exception in this case just in order to placate an internet "warrior" who doesn't risk his life in the ring but who likes to criticise those who do and call them cowards is ridiculous. Campbell has proved in a long career that he is a true warrior. Have you?
yeah we all know what happened in the Diaz fight, Diaz finished the fight with his eye worst off then Nate's was.
Diaz didnt have an internal hemmorage of his eye. Why does everyone keep babbling about the cut? Nate himself told the cutman to forget about the cut, that he had a serious eye problem.
It seems that no matter how many times you say "it wasnt the cut", people still babble on about "well so and so had a worse cut". I believe it when the govt. says kids graduate these days with about a 7th grade reading level. It sure shows in these boards sometimes.......
The rules are clear. If an injury due to an accidental foul results in the fight being stopped before 4 rounds, its a NC. Bradley doesnt hit hard enough to bruise a ripe peach, so anyone who thinks a punch caused that eye injury and not the headbutt is simply ******ed.
Comment