Originally posted by dino
View Post
Foreman's median weight in the 70ies was 217lbs. This is approx. like Chris Byrd or Eliseo Castillo.
Originally posted by dino
View Post
Moreover it applies what I wrote at:
//krikya360.com/forums/sh...29#post5523729
Tyson was KOing mainly bums, greens and opponents smaller than 6'3''
Originally posted by dino
View Post
In the whole 70ies Ali has scored 5 (FIVE) KOs.
Joe Frazier (= another featherfist) is slightly better with 8 KOs (4 of them against bums) in 18 fights: 44% KOratio.
As a comparison to a modern featherfist: Chris Byrd scored 18 KOs in 41 fights = has a KOratio like Frazier, but is TALLER than Frazier, REACHIER than Frazier, 10lbs HEAVIER than Frazier. And everyone knows exactly what happened when Byrd met Wlad.
Since Frazier is a featherfist (and Ali even more so) that is the reason why their clashes took so many rounds: 2 featherfists with somewhat good chins patting each other for 13+ rounds.
Originally posted by dino
View Post
Marciano had not a single real heavyweight fight (= both opponents 200+)
Dempsey was only involved 1 time in his career in a real heavyweight fight: Against 0-6-0 bum Tom Riley.
Louis had only 11 (nearly all against bums or former cruisers) as I wrote at
//krikya360.com/forums/sh...62#post5596462
The main reason for the delusion that Marciano is EVEN MENTIONED in the same sentence like Lennox or Tyson is a huge mistake that the boxing associations made: They kept the name "heavyweight" when they increased the minimum weight to 200+. That way fans delude themselves into thinking that Marciano has ANYTHING to do with modern heavies, whereas he was fighting cruisers. Add to it that Marciano was fighting in a terrible era (drained by the second world war) and that Marciano had thinner gloves (= higher KOratio) and you realize how overrated he is.
People should compare Marciano (12 fights against 175+ non-bums) to Roy Jones Jr (11 fights against 175+ non-bums), not to Lennox or Tyson.
Originally posted by dino
View Post
//krikya360.com/forums/sh...40#post5597040
so we won't know how good he really was compared to nowadays heavies, but he was the best-record'ed of his era, I give him that.
I disagree with you however on the statement that Vitali Klitschko is a top3 heavyweight. By his performances maybe. By his record not. Wlad, Lennox, Tyson and others have a better record than Vitali.
Now I already know the typical reaction to this post of good-old-time-nostalgists:
- Giving Bad Karma
- "How can you call yourself a boxing fan?"
- "Ridiculous nuthugger"
- "Ali's opponents were soooo much better than nowadays opponents" (they were not, read my sig)
- "Ali's opponents' opponents were soooo much better than nowadays opponents' opponents" (as if you would know)
- "Worst post I read in this forum"/"Ban him already" (as if I would care)
- "You obviously never watched boxing" (unfortunately I watched all of Ali's fights... Dirty and BOOORING)
- "Records don't tell the whole story" (they tell 95% of the story)
- "Ali had more heart/ footwork" or similar nonsense (I never saw "heart" on the scorecards and boxing is not a ballet competition).
If you want to state one of the above or similar statements then please know:
- You are so predictable
- Watch Ali's heavyweight fights WHILE NOT ON YOUR KNEES
Comment