Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WBA Declines To Sanction Klitschko-Chagaev
Collapse
-
the wba is not sanctioning this fight b/c they know if chagaev loses, he will want to hold on to the belt and will charge him a bs sanctioning fee. if klits were to win it, he would vacate the title before making a BS mandatory.
Comment
-
The orgs. may never be eliminated completely but the majority of true boxing fans know that most alphabet champions are bogus. Having an alphabet title is much less prestigious then it was 20-30 years ago. Unless they are forced to clean their orgs up, they will become irrelevant to most. The top fighters will just throw away the belts and the fans will know who the real champion is, this process has already begun.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Welter_Skelter View PostI would also like to add the IBO belt to that list.. since their Rankings are based on a computer.. They do NOT instantly rank "their" champs at Number 1.. and they rank other Bodies champs..
IBO
Also, there is a place for mandatories (which neither the Ring nor the IBO have). What happens when there are no mandatories is that you get Archie Moore getting his first title shot at the age of 39, despite having been a contender for most of the previous 16 years. That's why they're a necessary evil. But there needs to be fewer sanctioning organisations, and they need to be made less evil. Not sure how that can be achieved though, but IMO adding yet another alphabet organisation to the mix won't help at all.Last edited by Dave Rado; 06-19-2009, 07:34 PM.
Comment
-
The article says the vacant lineal heavyweight championship is on the line, its not! Ring may be putting their belt up but thats not the same as the lineal.
They would have to beat Vitali to have a claim on that. Further complication is Valuev! But Vitali holds the strongest claim to lineal of them all at present.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny Rebel View PostThe orgs. may never be eliminated completely but the majority of true boxing fans know that most alphabet champions are bogus. Having an alphabet title is much less prestigious then it was 20-30 years ago. Unless they are forced to clean their orgs up, they will become irrelevant to most. The top fighters will just throw away the belts and the fans will know who the real champion is, this process has already begun.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave Rado View PostHave you seen who their champions are? Bika at Super-Middleweight, Mundine at Middleweight, Marali at Super-Featherweight - that's just crazy. And IMO we don't need yet another alphabet organisation, there are too many already. We need some to be forced out of business and the rest to be reformed. In the meantime, The Ring's champions and rankings are the best regarded in the sport, especially the champions, because nearly all are based on the lineal title (which the IBO champions are not).
Also, there is a place for mandatories (which neither the Ring nor the IBO have). What happens when there are no mandatories is that you get Archie Moore getting his first title shot at the age of 39, despite having been a contender for most of the previous 16 years. That's why they're a necessary evil. But there needs to be fewer of them, and they need to be made less evil. Not sure how that can be achieved though, but IMO adding yet another alphabet organisation to the mix won't help at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lennon View PostThe article says the vacant lineal heavyweight championship is on the line, its not! Ring may be putting their belt up but thats not the same as the lineal.
They would have to beat Vitali to have a claim on that. Further complication is Valuev! But Vitali holds the strongest claim to lineal of them all at present.
As for Valuev, as far as I'm concerned he ducked out of the rematch with Chagaev. Apart from the fact that Chagaev had extremely low and completely non-infectious levels of hepatitis antigen left over from an illness a couple of years ago, Valuev was told the fight could go ahead if he had a vaccination, and he refused to have one. That, in my book, is a clear duck.
Comment
Comment