Originally posted by savorduhflavor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was JCC a ***** for "making" Whitaker fight at 145? Did it effect the outcome?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View PostAt first I thought they should fight at 144 to make it fair, but now with all this backslash I hope they fight at 154! lol, no seriously I agree 145 is good.
Comment
-
this small at this weight or big at this weight thingy is rendering the weight classes almost useless...
Comment
-
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View PostTrue. Not from me, but many people will. Goes with the sport I guess and Nuthuggerism in general.
On the flip side, even if the fight were at 147 and Pacman won, "Margarito destroyed Cotto!!" or "Clottey destroyed Cotto!" or "Cotto was SHOT!!" etc.
There will never be peace here.Originally posted by street bully View PostI agree, but what can you say. Well if that happened it would be true, because who was the last credible opponent Cotto walked down and smashed up....Juidah? It's a lose lose scenerio for Cotto, if he wins then people would say it's like James Kirkland losing to Dawson, if he loses........Then what can i say it would be humiliating.
There are so many reasons why this fight shouldn't happen....but at the same time it's such a compelling fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by talip bin osman View Postthis small at this weight or big at this weight thingy is rendering the weight classes almost useless...
Going to the body against Pacquiao is dangrous and I don't see Cotto getting to the body, atleast not without getting hit upstairs. Pacquiao can win this, he doesn't need a catch weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostPacquiao should fight Cotto at 147. Why wouldn't he want to recieve full credit for the win?
pac fighting cotto at 147 lbs is suicide.
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View PostCotto isn't considered a big welterweight either, he's actually quite small.
If it's at 145, to me there should be no excuses from cotto fans IF he loses. Same with Pacquiao if he loses.
cotto's has too much of a size advantage at 145 lbs.
Originally posted by savorduhflavor View PostI agree.
But the thing is....you know that if Cotto just walks Pac down and destroys him...which is possible, all anyone is gonna hear is that Cotto is too big obviously he killed a featherweight blah blah blah.
Originally posted by warp1432 View PostNo it didn't, but Whitaker was a natural lightweight in his prime. He was small. Mosley going down to 144 is not the same. Cotto shouldn't go down more then 145.
Originally posted by ИATAS206 View PostAt first I thought they should fight at 144 to make it fair, but now with all this backslash I hope they fight at 154! lol, no seriously I agree 145 is good.
cotto's size advantage is too much at 145 lbs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by savorduhflavor View PostI agree with both of you. It's a lose-lose for Cotto. If Pac wins he's the man for beating a bigger fighter....and deservedly so, if he loses it's oh well, he finally bit off more than he could chew.
There are so many reasons why this fight shouldn't happen....but at the same time it's such a compelling fight.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostNo, I give Cotto full credit for the win. I'm sick of people making Pacquiao look out to be this small guy. Pacquiao was bigger then JMM, EM, MAB, DLH (Not Naturally)...didn't the tale of the tape with Hatton reveal how big Pacquiao was? Cotto isn't a little guy but he sure as hell isn't Clottey, Margarito or Cintron big.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View PostNo, I give Cotto full credit for the win. I'm sick of people making Pacquiao look out to be this small guy. Pacquiao was bigger then JMM, EM, MAB, DLH (Not Naturally)...didn't the tale of the tape with Hatton reveal how big Pacquiao was? Cotto isn't a little guy but he sure as hell isn't Clottey, Margarito or Cintron big.
Comment
Comment