Mayweather’s Hit List Includes Pacquiao, Mosley, Cotto

[IMDAZED]

Too slick. Too black.

[DuttyAlacrity]

the same oscar that got his face broken by stevie forbes in his next fight?
that guy?

and cotto who had already taken two life changing beatings?
lost convincingly to austin trout in his next fight following floyd?


i've gone over manny in great detail. hell, i've gone over all three in great detail. i can reiterate, if you'd like.

how does bringing all of this up make me ******? you sound childish when you react that way, frankly. that's exactly how a child reacts.

You know you can take any fighter in any era and dissect their wins and losses like this? From Ali to Henry Armstrong to jack Dempsey to SRL. People do it to Floyd because of his "attitude" and because he calls himself TBE.
If you were to be completely objective who can you logically rank higher than Floyd in this era? Also where would you rank him all time. I'm curious

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

New England seems like 2-3 different posters. He now posts JUST like this good ole user on the scene.

[Doctor_Tenma]

pacquiao didn't dart around on floyd because floyd's right hand is that f#cking good!


did i do that right?

It changes the dynamic as we've seen with Pacquiao.

[MrRolltide91]

So is Mayweather still in his prime?

he young doe

[IMDAZED]

he young doe

Only one fighter gets to rewind the clock in fantasy fights doe

[New England]

I responded. And I think it was you who ran away

Since these guys are so faded(and Mayweather still prime), where exactly did you have them ranked when he fought them?

that's called a red herring.
it's designed to distract from the issue at hand, which is that they were faded. you did not respond to that. believing that rank and fadedness are correlated directly is a fallacy.

i respond with where they were ranked, and you say "so there," and act like it's relevant, or supports your stance on the issue ["proves your point."]

in reality, you haven't addressed the issue, which is that they were faded fighters. you remove responsibility from yourself to address this by asking your ranking question to distract from the issue.


a red herring was used because it drew away the scent of hound dogs.

[New England]

New England seems like 2-3 different posters. He now posts JUST like this good ole user on the scene.

because i don't have consistent biases?

that's a compliment.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Whats funny is that had ANY of these fighters on Floyds beaten him not a SINGLE poster hating now wouldve used Floyd being out of his prime as an excuse. Straight frauds.

I always say they think Floyd is Benjamin Button. As if hes not pushing 40 with glass hands and has almost 20 years of pro experience.


But but he young doe


But but but he aint took no damage doe



Frauds man

[IMDAZED]

that's called a red herring.
it's designed to distract from the issue at hand, which is that they were faded.

i respond with where they were ranked, and you say "so there," and act like it's relevant, or supports your stance on the issue ["proves your point."]

in reality, you haven't addressed the issue, which is that they were faded fighters. you remove responsibility from yourself to address this by asking your ranking question to distract from the issue.


a red herring was used because it drew away the scent of hound dogs.

This post is a red herring. Anyway, back to the issue.

Since these fighters were so faded, where did you have them ranked?