Originally posted by pbftxrs316
View Post
Originally posted by pbftxrs316
View Post
This is the problem with these fraud jr apologists, they think fraud jr is so great that they bust with "o man he's a monster @ so, so, he would have beaten so, so" They deal with hypothetical outcomes of match ups.
it doesnt matter whether or not fraud jr wanted it but cotto didnt want or vice versa, they didnt fight.
Fact of the matter is they didnt fight. He didnt fight a lot fighters. whether or not who wanted it or didnt want it he didnt fight them period. FACT.
woulda, coulda, shoulda, is not fact. Its the motto of fraud jr fluffers.
my opinion about the matter, your opinion about the matter, bob arum's opinion about the matter, its just that opinions.
You remind me of those calzaghe apologist who posts bbc & uk articles saying so so pulled out because they wanted so & so. we wanted to fight him but he didnt want it, make it gospel.
U believe everything u read brah? U want to believ bob "i was lying yesterday but today im telling the truth" arum?
@ 140 he fights gatti, brussells, & corley
@ 135 he fights ndou, sosa, castillo 2x
@ 147 he fights baldomir, hatton,mitchell,Judah
@ 154 old oscar
go ahead defend that beast of a resume.
Comment