Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chad Dawson is overrated.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I agree, and have been saying the same thing ever since the Johnson fight.

    Bernard Hopkins would take this kid to school big time.

    Calzaghe would "Lacy" his ass.

    Comment


      #12
      I actually thought Tarver would win the rematch because of the fact Dawson has those lapses. Figured with the track record, Tarver's punching power, and perhaps a different motivation this time around things would change.

      They did lol because Tarver gave him a much tougher fight and you could see that by the expression on Dawson's face. I don't think he's ready to fight Calzaghe........I mean Tarver did his best looking like a 40 year old man relying on infrequent showy punches and he still couldn't really impress.

      All the times he'd miss with those wild power punches looked bad.



      | |

      Comment


        #13
        He's overrated because he's not as good as Hopkins and Calzaghe?

        There's a lot of overrated boxers out there.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by floydjoy View Post
          hopkins would toy with him
          Dawson would outwork him easily.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by darkstar777 View Post
            I would favor Dawson over ANYONE in 175 or 168.
            HE gets KTFO by Froch and kessler, Bute UDs hiM!!!!!!!!!!!

            Comment


              #16
              I can't believe some people actually had Chad in their P4P list......

              SMH

              Comment


                #17
                I think Glen Johnson would beat Chad Dawson IMO.

                He'd just outwork him and ****.



                | |

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by darkstar777 View Post
                  Dawson would outwork him easily.
                  LMAO jajajajajajajaaj

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by street bully View Post
                    From what I saw right now this man would get outclassed by Hopkins and even Calzaghe. The guy dissapointed me big time.
                    He didn't look too good tonight i was also a bit disappointed. For a 26 year old he's WAY too economical... He may be hiding stamina problems that's why he fights in spurts.. At 26 you aren't supposed to fight in Spurts. I haven't seen too many fights of Dawson but if he won vs Adamek he must have been more active in that fight. Maybe that was respect for Tarver's left... I don't know, too soon to tell for me at least. His defense is phenomenal though.
                    I'd favor him vs Calzaghe and Bernard at this point because one's a fake ass one trick Poney (zaghe for clarity) and the other one is too old for pro boxing. Dawson would never let Zaghe off the hook after the mandatory 1st round KD and would Ricky Hatton him out of there. Bernard is too old and can't fight 12 rounds anymore really.
                    Last edited by Allucard; 05-09-2009, 10:29 PM.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by The_Bringer View Post
                      I agree, and have been saying the same thing ever since the Johnson fight.

                      Bernard Hopkins would take this kid to school big time.

                      Calzaghe would "Lacy" his ass.
                      Calzaghe and Hopkins would lose to Dawson. And you know Hopkins wouldn't be able to school him, he's no Pavlik. I think Dawson really couldn't do anything different from the last against Tarver, it was still an impressive win. If you're going to judge Dawson from this fight, you're clearly underestimating him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP