Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Self Evident Proof That Antonio Margarito Never Cheated.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Kevin Malone View Post
    If that's all he's doing it's a waste. Governments don't rule against themselves. Even if magically the CSAC loses the lawsuit people, myself included, will still think he cheated. I'll think that some judge and jury were paid off to rule in Margarito's favor (maybe how the CSAC was to rule against him).

    He should be making videos showing exactly how his hands were wrapped, showing fans what Naz had a problem with. He isn't doing any of that. Margarito is sitting on the sidelines doing nothing. I think there is a lot he could be doing if he truly believed he was innocent and suing the CSAC should be last on his priority list.



    If he's in the midst of a lawsuit his lawyers are probably advising against this kind of thing.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Boxing Fiend View Post
      ^ I call this a valid contribution.
      The burden of proof is on the person saying he cheated. To me, from what I've read and heard, I think it's pretty clear he cheated. As far as proof? We'll never know.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Kevin Malone View Post
        The burden of proof is on the person saying he cheated. To me, from what I've read and heard, I think it's pretty clear he cheated. As far as proof? We'll never know.
        Exactly.

        It can't be proven either way.

        But some ******s think if they argue more they will be right some how.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by The Dapeedreean View Post
          If he's in the midst of a lawsuit his lawyers are probably advising against this kind of thing.
          All I can say is that (most) boxing fans will still think he cheated regardless if he wins the legal battle. If he wins the legal battle and exposes the CSAC as a fraud then what? It proves nothing to me. It doesn't show he fought fairly, just that the government organization that ruled against him is corrupt, which I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt is true.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by Kevin Malone View Post
            All I can say is that (most) boxing fans will still think he cheated regardless if he wins the legal battle. If he wins the legal battle and exposes the CSAC as a fraud then what? It proves nothing to me. It doesn't show he fought fairly, just that the government organization that ruled against him is corrupt, which I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt is true.
            It shows everything. It proves that theyre corrupt and their suspension is illegitimate by extension.
            Thats like saying, if you prove a cop framed a guy, that the guy is still somehow guilty.
            He's not...he was singled out and set up.

            And how do we know he's not a cheater??? Cuz' he's been fighting for 15 + years and nobodies ever accused him of it thats why.

            Is Margarito some sort of master jedi master that can bypass all of these commissions and hide bricks in his hands??? lol. No he's not. He's always been a clean fighter.
            Its only a matter of time that the truth becomes public and he is vindicated.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Boxing Fiend View Post
              Exactly.

              It can't be proven either way.

              But some ******s think if they argue more they will be right some how.
              It can and will be proven. And you are officially ignored.

              Comment


                #77
                If he were so innocent, he would be making more noise.

                The end.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by The Dapeedreean View Post
                  It shows everything. It proves that theyre corrupt and their suspension is illegitimate by extension.
                  Thats like saying, if you prove a cop framed a guy, that the guy is still somehow guilty.
                  He's not...he was singled out and set up.

                  And how do we know he's not a cheater??? Cuz' he's been fighting for 15 + years and nobodies ever accused him of it thats why.

                  Is Margarito some sort of master jedi master that can bypass all of these commissions and hide bricks in his hands??? lol. No he's not. He's always been a clean fighter.
                  Its only a matter of time that the truth becomes public and he is vindicated.
                  You are putting too much faith in a government ruling against itself and calling it's own organization corrupt.

                  With your cop analogy, how often do cops deal drugs in a sting operation? All the time, but they don't get arrested for dealing drugs. It's a clear cut double standard. If Margarito was set up by the CSAC why would the State of California ever admit that? They wouldn't. That's the very nature of politics.

                  And what happens if (when) Margarito loses his lawsuit? Is he then automatically guilty? Of course not, which it was ****** of him to not try to clear his name on his own instead of sitting on the sidelines. Your belief that he is somehow vindicated by winning this case (which I think he has about a 1:1000 chance of winning) I think is wrongheaded.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by Kevin Malone View Post
                    You are putting too much faith in a government ruling against itself and calling it's own organization corrupt.

                    With your cop analogy, how often do cops deal drugs in a sting operation? All the time, but they don't get arrested for dealing drugs. It's a clear cut double standard. If Margarito was set up by the CSAC why would the State of California ever admit that? They wouldn't. That's the very nature of politics.

                    And what happens if (when) Margarito loses his lawsuit? Is he then automatically guilty? Of course not, which it was ****** of him to not try to clear his name on his own instead of sitting on the sidelines. Your belief that he is somehow vindicated by winning this case (which I think he has about a 1:1000 chance of winning) I think is wrongheaded.
                    Since when does the state decide its own fate? Wouldn't this be decided by a jury? Otherwise its an obvious conflict of interest for the state to judge itself, lol.
                    That sounds like Stalinist Russia...or Kalifornia...oh **** you're right...

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by The Dapeedreean View Post
                      Since when does the state decide its own fate? Wouldn't this be decided by a jury? Otherwise its an obvious conflict of interest for the state to judge itself, lol.
                      That sounds like Stalinist Russia...or Kalifornia...oh **** you're right...
                      I'm not positive how it works, but I'm not sure civil cases (this is a civil case right?) in California even have juries.

                      Antonio Margarito would have been much better off telling the California commission to screw off, show the fans and other fighters exactly what happened and where the misunderstanding occurred or where he was set-up, and try to get more fights in another state. He should answer every question and set up interviews with press.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP