Margarito beat Cotto fair and square

[Mr. Fantastic]

i dont even wanna get started again I just finished with chicano

Finished?? I was just getting warmed up in owning your ass. This guy, hate clouds you. Funny too that you think this has to do with him being Mexican, just shows your ignorance.

[dondi330]

DIDN'T YOU KNOW COTTO'S TRAINER WAS THERE SEEING TONY'S HANDS GETTING WRAPPED????


You stans are too easy.

You same response are getting tired..you have been owned on this subject by many, so many times and you dont learn.
The answer to your question is the same as it always is.
Cottos trainer could have over looked it, but that doesnt take away from what he did...also the inspectors had already passed one of Margaritos wraps before Naz got to it and Naz had him unwrap to find the cheating....This same scenario could have easily happened with Cotto...you know that ...but your blind.

[Pullcounter]

Sorry, that aint the reason. Ill give you a hint-Paris-

where's your proof that margo used plaster of paris?

I already said that you cant accuse him but you cant say he won it fair and square but yet you choose to argue with me. How does it sound rediculous? he coulda started using it to every one of his opponents after he lsot with Williams because he knew he might not get another shot. Im just saying it could have happened.

coulda, wouda, shoulda.... but not based on fact or evidence

[BadNewz]

Margarito is so slow that you shouldn't get hit by him enough for his handwraps to even matter. An elite fighter would beat Margarito down even if he had cement on his hands. Cotto lost because of his lack of talent. He's a mediocrity.

[Mr. Fantastic]

If you're going to call someone "******ed" at least spell it correctly.



How do you know that Cotto didn't cheat against Michael Jennings? You don't. So using your rationale that means we should think that Jennings wouldn't have lost if it wasn't for Miguel Cheatto?

He even spelled You're wrong. lol

[BoriKua305]

what it means is that there is no proof that margo cheated against cotto

and i already said that you prick i said theres no proof but you cant rsay he won fair and square either unless ur capetillo or margarito

[Deja_Vous]

that dont mean **** the comminsion in california didnt see **** either when they wrapped it. Neither did ****m until he asked them to take it off so that doesnt mean ****

Nazeem got su****ious when he saw TONY'S GLOVE ALREADY WRAPPED before he AND the Commisioners arrived..!!!

He flashbacked to Trinidad's left gloved being PRE-WRAPPED.

The Nevada commision is a lot stricter than California's..

Cotto's camp was there WATCHING dude...They didn't see anything wrong.

Cotto got *******ualized by Margarito(as if he wasn't sweet enuff already).......fair and square.......Ya'll have to deal with this ****

[Pullcounter]

You same response are getting tired..you have been owned on this subject by many, so many times and you dont learn.
The answer to your question is the same as it always is.
Cottos trainer could have over looked it, but that doesnt take away from what he did...also the inspectors had already passed one of Margaritos wraps before Naz got to it and Naz had him unwrap to find the cheating....This same scenario could have easily happened with Cotto...you know that ...but your blind.

sure it "could" have happened w/ cotto, but you have no proof that it did happen with cotto.

[dondi330]

Answer......why wouldnt margarito cheat against an unbeaten cotto, if he was about to cheat with a 5 loss mosley?

[BoriKua305]

where is your proof that margo cheated againt cotto???



sorry, its not common sense, its called jumping to conclusions without any evidence

Jumping to conclusions you do that better than anybody i seen alot of your post