Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why in the hell did Jim Lampley keep saying over and over that JMM is P4P # 2???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Devil Man View Post
    Diaz, Casamayor weren't on the P4P list. Pavlik, Tarver, Calzaghe were and correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't Winky on the P4P list? I have B-Hop at 2nd
    Yeah but Bhop lost to Calzaghe.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Carolina Bomber View Post
      Yeah but Bhop lost to Calzaghe.
      Lost to Calzaghe and then dominated Pavlik a P4P fighter

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Vladimir303 View Post
        He kept saying multiple times, where does he get his information from???
        The Pacman is #1 so get over it. JAT

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Devil Man View Post
          Lost to Calzaghe and then dominated Pavlik a P4P fighter
          And JMM beat Barrera, a p4p fighter, then gave Pac(Current p4p Champ) all he could handle twice.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Lady Fan View Post
            The Pacman is #1 so get over it. JAT
            You know Pac has to fight Marquez again though...

            Comment


              #36
              JMM fans saying he is pound for pound #2 for beating Juan Diaz are crazy as ****.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Carolina Bomber View Post
                You know Pac has to fight Marquez again though...
                he doesnt have to, but it would be cool if he did

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by IwatchBoxing View Post
                  JMM fans saying he is pound for pound #2 for beating Juan Diaz are crazy as ****.
                  Your right, it is crazy. He was #2 before he beat Diaz.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post
                    he doesnt have to, but it would be cool if he did
                    So cool! But you dont think 30 yrs from now, boxing historians will say, "yeah Pac, ATG, but he never fought JMM again."?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Vladimir303 View Post
                      So Hopkins is under JMM is what you're saying?
                      Definitely

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP