Originally posted by Seleção No. 13
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao vs. Cotto in 09: Arum Would Attempt To Do It
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by 2501 View PostWhat they will say is....
Floyd Fan: Naw, Cotto lost because Pac weightdrained him. He put Cotto at a disadvantage because he didn't fight him at Cotto's weight.
Boxing Fan: Wait, you give Floyd credit for beating Marquez and Hatton, yet he made Marquez come up 2 divisions and Hatton one division, don't you?
Floyd Fan: Floyd called the shots, they signed the contract, they didn't have to sign the contract.
Boxing Fan: But Cotto signed the contract to and the agreed weight was 145, only 2 pounds below 147 where as Marquez had to go up 9 pounds to 144 (which Mayweather didn't even bother meeting) and Hatton came up 7 pounds from 140. Shouldnt what applies for Floyd also apply for Pacquiao?
Floyd Fan: Typical ******* always trying to change and cheat history. You guys are so racist against black fighters, you can't see the truth.
Boxing Fan:
LMAO!!! Greenies coming your way!
Comment
-
Originally posted by gopi11 View PostFor those who have Time Warner as their cable provider, you can rewatch Pacquiao vs. Cotto and Pacquiao vs. Diaz (Top Rank version) for free on SportsOnDemand, channel 103. They also have Mosley/Margarito and Mosley/Dela Hoya there...
BUMP! For those who have Time Warner...
Comment
-
-
-
-
Oh hell the first five pages of this thread have made me officially give Pacquiao more credit for destroying Cotto than I gave him before. I can't stop laughing.
Comment
Comment