Ricky Hatton will beat Manny Pacquiao.

[deliveryman]

You just described every nuthugger in this forum....

It certainly wasn't very hard to do. They're all the same.

[sparked_85]

Pacman is better than Hatton.

But so was Tszyu.

Hatton needs a perfect night and hope Pacman is not strong enough in close. I wouldn't bank on that Pacman is a beast.

[Mr. Philadel]

If the same Hatton that fought kostya Tszyu comes into the ring against pacquiao we will see Hatton win a TKO/KO victory.

blah blah blah......why is it we hear this same **** before EVERY Hatton fight these days? by the way... Pacman would KO that Hatton also...

[hammerhiem]

blah blah blah......why is it we hear this same **** before EVERY Hatton fight these days? by the way... Pacman would KO that Hatton also...

Tzsyu at LWW Ko's Pacman every time they step in the ring.

[CaRnAgEViOLaToR]

pacman will beat ricky's face bloody.

[Boricua6]

"... I think Hatton will be able for the most part, dictate the pace AND the range of which the fight is fought at."

NICE TRY - your "objective analysis" is a lukewarm attempt at trying to convince yourself that Hatton has a chance.

IF Hatton is so much stronger than Pacman - why can't he hold his own when he goes up to 147? Brute strength is brute strength, right? The man gets thrown around like a freakin rag doll (even with a journeyman like Collazo). Pacman, physically, holds his own against PBF, Collazo, etc.

Bottomline - Hatton ain't dictating crap; you have to have SKILLS to dictate range (if you think Hatton has a semblance of a jab, you're delusional)....Pacman is just as live, if not more so, with his footwork, angles, and hands AND he has the skills to do things to Hatton his girlfriend only dreams of...

I like Hatton a lot as a boxing personality, but he ain't beating Pacman, plain and simple.

[KabukiJoe]

I'm starting to think that you don't know the definition of "speculation", and that you're not comprehending a word that I'm saying.

Anyway, we'll just agree to disagree since you're adverse to any type of open-ended discussion. Which is kind of lame, to be honest. You just come across as ignorant.

...when dealing with "emo's" it's called "because I say so"...


Kabuki Joe

[aether]

Pac underestimating Hatton will be ****** in his part. still see pac by wide ud or late round stoppage. around the 9th-10th maybe

[JOM'S]

who ever is the underdog on this fight is for sure a LIVE one...

i asked the question before but i seem to not get the answe ...

how heavy does ricky go up at fight night at jr.welter?

[reptar]

"... I think Hatton will be able for the most part, dictate the pace AND the range of which the fight is fought at."

NICE TRY - your "objective analysis" is a lukewarm attempt at trying to convince yourself that Hatton has a chance.

IF Hatton is so much stronger than Pacman - why can't he hold his own when he goes up to 147? Brute strength is brute strength, right? The man gets thrown around like a freakin rag doll (even with a journeyman like Collazo). Pacman, physically, holds his own against PBF, Collazo, etc.

Bottomline - Hatton ain't dictating crap; you have to have SKILLS to dictate range (if you think Hatton has a semblance of a jab, you're delusional)....Pacman is just as live, if not more so, with his footwork, angles, and hands AND he has the skills to do things to Hatton his girlfriend only dreams of...

I like Hatton a lot as a boxing personality, but he ain't beating Pacman, plain and simple.

Go watch Hatton vs Paulie again and then come back and tell us again that Hatton does not have a jab.
To the lad who did the original post, good stuff, that is exactly how I see the fight going