Marquez v. Vasquez was better then Cotto v. Margarito, no doubt about it. The skill level was higher and two little guy who carry bombs in there hands. And you never knew who the winner was till the end.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Marquez vs Vasquez III better than Cotto vs Margarito?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Puas View PostHBO will replay their best fights of 2008. According to BS posters, Margarito vs Cotto is the best of those fights. Now I ask you this. Did Showtime's top fight, Marquez vs Vasquez III, outdo HBO's best fight?
Which was better?
Comment
-
Izzy-Raf was a lil better, although they basically followed the same pattern of both fighters each dominating 1 half of the fight. Boxer piles up points, then the puncher beats the hell out of em in the back half. Izzy-Raf was all around a lil more skillful too.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by mangler View PostIzzy-Raf was a lil better, although they basically followed the same pattern of both fighters each dominating 1 half of the fight. Boxer piles up points, then the puncher beats the hell out of em in the back half. Izzy-Raf was all around a lil more skillful too.
| |
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Antonio- View PostVasquez/Marquez was better. I think Cotto/Margarito might have had more consistant action, but Marquez/Vasquez had bigger moments. The 12th and 4th rounds were pretty remarkable. I might have Adamek/Cunningham over both actually.
I missed that Cunningham fight, looks like I'll have to download it now.Last edited by El Chicano; 12-25-2008, 06:30 PM.
Comment
-
One of these two fights has got be the FOTY in terms of top notch competition, competitiveness, and drama.
Comment
-
Comment