Originally posted by jacobs
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
greater fighter, trinidad or chavez?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by ALPHA O`MEGA View Postchavez was a badass but i still think people give trinidad alot of ****.
Chavez gets a lot of flack for padding his record with cab drivers, but those weren't the only guys Chavez beat. He has wins over quality fighters like Edwin Rosario, Jose Luis Ramirez, Meldrick Taylor, Juan LaPorte, Rocky Lockridge, Roger Mayweather, etc....I already described what I thought of his skills a few posts above.
And Trinidad gets a lot of **** for not being the most skilled or smart guy, but he wasn't some fighter with power and little else. He threw great combinations, and had good hand speed. He was a sucker for a straight right hand, but his defense was decent. He caught a lot of DLH's flurries on his gloves or they hit air, but Jim Lampley and the crowd would have ******s regardless. Tito was a top notch finisher. He knew when to throw punches to be accurate (and that takes smarts, knowing WHEN and WHERE to throw punches). He had a heavy jab that he used to set up his blows. He had great stamina. Even when he was having weight problems at 147, he finished strong against the likes of Pea and DLH through 12. He would come back stronger after getting dropped. He had a good variety of punches. The left hook was the best, but the straight right hand was no joke either. It was the straight right hand late in round 6 that turned things around against Vargas, after Vargas had dropped Tito in round 4 (nut shots aside) and dominated round 5. He was a sick bodypuncher as well.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Thread Stealer View PostChavez was NOT crude.
Comment
-
TITO beat better oposition, and in the way to do that, he broke a lots other boxers fans hearts aaaaawww.he seem to get a lot hate from other pplLast edited by williamhvx1; 09-06-2008, 07:35 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tengoshi View PostAt that level and compared to a lot of other fighters yes, he was. Watch the Taylor fight. He wasn't a pure brawler and he didn't completely lack defense, but he was not slick by any stretch of the imagination. The skill he had was mostly concentrated in accuracy, which combined well with his power and an overall sense of strategy (again, by going to the body). Glad to offend you with my assessment though.
For a pressure fighter, he was solid defensively. He slipped a lot of shots and rolled with them well. The Taylor fight is actually an example of how he slipped shots. He was losing, but not taking nearly as much as the commentators and others would make it out to be. For instance, early in round 8 (or 9?) when Lampley goes "look at the speed of Meldrick Taylor's flurry!", but Chavez avoided all of them. Later on, in round 9, Taylor landed a beautiful combination (when Lampley was talking about Benton's game plan), but Chavez slipped nearly all of the follow-up shots. Blind Lampley said Chavez was on the verge of going down, but Chavez was slipping the shots. It wasn't the lack of defense that was losing it for JCC, it was Taylor's amazing workrate and speed.
Chavez picked shots well, had good footwork, threw combinations beautifully and mixed them from head to body. He created and exploited openings in his combos, and they were short shots, not wide wild swings.
What was crude about him?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Thread Stealer View PostOffended? No, but I find it very hard to see Chavez as "crude".
For a pressure fighter, he was solid defensively. He slipped a lot of shots and rolled with them well. The Taylor fight is actually an example of how he slipped shots. He was losing, but not taking nearly as much as the commentators and others would make it out to be. For instance, early in round 8 (or 9?) when Lampley goes "look at the speed of Meldrick Taylor's flurry!", but Chavez avoided all of them. Later on, in round 9, Taylor landed a beautiful combination (when Lampley was talking about Benton's game plan), but Chavez slipped nearly all of the follow-up shots. Blind Lampley said Chavez was on the verge of going down, but Chavez was slipping the shots. It wasn't the lack of defense that was losing it for JCC, it was Taylor's amazing workrate and speed.
Chavez picked shots well, had good footwork, threw combinations beautifully and mixed them from head to body. He created and exploited openings in his combos, and they were short shots, not wide wild swings.
What was crude about him?
Comment
Comment