Originally posted by RagingBull22
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why is Hopkins' nickname "The Executioner"??
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Zocalo View PostI think something has to be said that he has been the only guy who has stopped both Oscar and Tito in a fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zocalo View PostI think something has to be said that he has been the only guy who has stopped both Oscar and Tito in a fight.
Against Oscar I don't really care about this because Oscar didn't look good at 160 his fight prior and two I always felt oscar was overrated anyways. Besides, any fighter would take a shot at oscar. doesn't matter what weight class, if they have a shot to take oscar they fight him. Why? because he's the golden boy and it will be your biggest payday. Hopkins made $10 million that fight, by faaaaaaar his largest payday of his career.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mspiegelo View Postjust because you prefer white fighters (as your gloating thread about "whites taking over boxing" clearly suggests), don't blab your boxing ignorance to the rest of us. obviously you have never seen hopkins old fights. he would break his opponents down with pinpoint accuracy until they crumbled. he ended careers like the undefeated joe lipsey. he took the young stallion glen johnson, who was an undefeated prospect at the time, to school. he was the only man to ever stop him and he did it in an embarassingly one-sided fashion. kelly is great. im a big fan. he is no B-hop. even this old, less active, defensive-minded b-hop will give him problems. try watching great boxers instead of only people with the same color skin as you and show some respect to a legend.
yo executioner... where in southeast queens you at? im in ridgewood
Comment
-
-
Tito has been down before and against Hopkins it wasn't a punch deal it was a 12 round beatdown that caused him to drop and his dad to throw in the towel. Plus, Tito looked fantastic at Middlweight prior to hopkins.
Against Oscar I don't really care about this because Oscar didn't look good at 160 his fight prior and two I always felt oscar was overrated anyways. Besides, any fighter would take a shot at oscar. doesn't matter what weight class, if they have a shot to take oscar they fight him. Why? because he's the golden boy and it will be your biggest payday. Hopkins made $10 million that fight, by faaaaaaar his largest payday of his career
Oscar yeah... he was the smaller man, looked bad at that weight but never really been hurt to the point where they was a legit chance of him being KO'ed. I didn't expect a KO from Hopkins even knowing the fact that he was significantly the bigger man.
No one else has/had put a KO loss on Oscar's or Tito's boxing resume and is something to acknowledge no matter what the circumstances.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RagingBull22 View PostYes, I know that
I just don't think his nickname suits him, that's all.
A guy with the nickname "The Executioner" should destroy people.
I guess he calls himself "The Executioner" because he bores people to death.
Comment
-
Originally posted by natas206 View PostTito had a middleweight belt. Hopkins wanted that belt in order to unify the division and become the first person to unify the middleweight division since Hagler. That was a goal. Should he have not fought Trinidad and not accomplish his goals because some Internet clown would have criticized him for it years later? lol. Not too mention Trinidad was a 7 to 1 favorite going into the fight.
Who cares if Oscar and Tito are the biggest names on his resume? Just so happens those are the two biggest names of the sport
Further, beating Trinidad opened a lot of doors for Hopkins. He worked hard his entire career and was denied the shot at a big fight for many years. Then he beat Trinidad after putting on a great performance.
Comment
Comment