Originally posted by Frank Ducketts
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao will be remembered as a greater fighter than Mayweather
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostPac never had a chin. People were fooled by this joker for a long time. A ****ing jab put him down, and people forget that Manny has been put to the canvas a number of times. It was just a matter of time before somebody put Pacquiao to sleep.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PAC-BOY View PostSomething got Floyd out the ring for a long time coming out of jail and all. Yeah it may be speculation , but it sure dont look good for the Money team:WORD: Could be trying to find his man hood again...oh wait
alright man...im out....f2ck with you later! :ANWOD:
Comment
-
Originally posted by ItsTrue View PostPacroid will end uo being remembered as the coward and fraud that he is avoiding stringent testing and fighting at catchweights. All the media that propped him up and loved him will get a cold dose of reality that theyre trying to ignore. Dont believe me? Look at Lance Armstrong and everyone that defended him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostFloyd will be remembered for robbing castillo. Pac will be remembered for being FOTD, not being ko'ed by JMM.
Yes, Morales and Barrera were ko'ed by Pac, but wont be remembered just for being being ko'ed by Pac. Morales and Barrera are great in their own right. Holyfield who is also greater than Floyd, wont be remembered for being koed by overweight toney.
Both Pacquiao and Mayweather will be remembered for achieving great things in the sport of boxing. I can say that without passion or prejudice. It's a fact no matter how people try to spin it. I'm not about disrespecting boxers out of petty fan rivalry. I like to look at the facts. Mayweather lost his motivation at a time the welterweight division had some intriguing potential match-ups. Pacquiao's career north of 135lbs has been ever so calculated and has spent a lot time at welterweight not actually fighting at the weight or not fighting welterweights. Mayweather should've fought Cotto sooner and should've faced Margarito. Pacquiao should've faced more stringent testing and should've found a way to beat Marquez convincingly. Can't say fairer than that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post[IMG]//i11.***********.com/albums/a155/Yofclef/Smiley%20faces%201/dunce.gif[/IMG] Ask Bhop...hes 46 and still going. Oh and the hype is 40 is the new 30 by the way! heheheheeeee One puch can change a fight. You dont have to be 20 or so to throw a punch...thats you ignorance to the sport and conditioning . I dont mind at all helping the less fortunate... i know youre a little slow so ill help you! Sorry you failed at a logical point!
Trying to appear clever with your pseudo-superiority rather than just answering a question is really poor show. I'll try again.
Do you think Marquez was genuinely at his best (ie. peak, prime) in his last fight with Pacquiao? That is what you alluded to when saying, "that's what happens when fighters face each other at their best". That would imply that not only was Marquez at his best at nearly 40, but so too was Pacquiao. Did Pacquiao just get knocked out at his best? I'll see if you can actually answer these questions like a man or try to pretend to be clever (and fail).
Comment
-
lots of salty flowmos in this thread. They were so happy last month thinking they won some kind of victory.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Marvellous1 View PostTranslate: "I STILL don't have an answer to your question".
Trying to appear clever with your pseudo-superiority rather than just answering a question is really poor show. I'll try again.
Do you think Marquez was genuinely at his best (ie. peak, prime) in his last fight with Pacquiao? That is what you alluded to when saying, "that's what happens when fighters face each other at their best". That would imply that not only was Marquez at his best at nearly 40, but so too was Pacquiao. Did Pacquiao just get knocked out at his best? I'll see if you can actually answer these questions like a man or try to pretend to be clever (and fail).
It doesnt matter that Pac lost. People who fight often and against great fighters lose, unlike Floyd who dont fight often and dont fight great fighters often.
Its important that to become great you challenge yourself often, losing doesnt matter, because great fighters lose. The incentive is to fight and not try keeping the zeros. The benefit of the doubt goes to the one who fights, losing isnt the important issue. Its the fact that you fight great fighters often. No one is going to hold it against Pac he got ko'ed in the fourth fight with JMM.
Cos anyone can say Floyd would also get ko'ed by JMM if he fought JMM at least 2 times, and if not 2 times, he would get koed in the third fight and no one can prove otherwise.
Comment
Comment