I felt Floyd clearly won as well. Even though his shots were not powerful they connected none the less. Oscar pressed the action, but didn't land much. He won but I agree it wasn't impressive. He didn't hurt Oscar and there was rounds where he didn't let his hands go and DLH won just based on action.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd Clearly Won but didnt Impress
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BmoreBrawler View Post
pbf did not in any way prove larry merchant wrong...he proved that a prime de la hoya could have beated him relatively solidly and we all know that de la hoya is hardly the best ever....floyd is a big fish in a small pond.Originally posted by Black Jesus View PostPrime DLH couldnt KO pernell whitaker who was passed it, Prime DLH probably would have fared worse since his defense was even more suspect in his early days than now. Oscar has never beaten a prime fighter who could move and punch, period. And as much as i have lauded and loved oscar over the years, anyone who can move and get out of his way has a shot at beating him, period. Against whitaker he did the same ****, throwing flurries etc, not really landing big, but trying to look busy, while Whitaker tagged his ass repeadedly but still got the loss in a close fight. Mind you whitaker was ****ing way past it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostI said i wud give PBF credit if he beat DLH convincinly. He didnt do that. But i will give him credit for getting the decision. I only heard the fight on the radio. But the thing is PBF is beat yesterdays great fighters to try establish his own. Why not box Hatton and Mosely who i do rate at this minute. DLH was a great name but he has lost to Mosely twice anyway when DLH was at his best.
Yes, he did beat Oscar convincingly.
Outlanded Oscar by about 90+ punches.
and outlanded Oscar in the power punch category by about 60-70 punches.
Now before you make yourself look ****** again, do us all a favor and shut up, UNTIL you actually watch it. Thanks.Last edited by deliveryman; 05-06-2007, 10:11 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by guru View Postthe only thing confirmed for me watching this fight is that PNF is NOT an all time great.... SRL and hearns would have murdered his, pot shotting, one punch at a time ass....
So I really don't see your point?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by deliveryman View PostThat's nice, SRL and Hearns were much, much, much, much, much bigger than Floyd.
So I really don't see your point?
not to mention they started careers at 135-140..... the only difference is in height, which oscar also had on floyd and you saw how insignificant that wasLast edited by guru; 05-06-2007, 10:22 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by guru View Postboth of them fought at 147, so thats the same weight.....
Mayweather is a natural Lightweight, and was a blown up Welterweight at the end of his career.
Leonard is a natural Welterweight and was a blown up Light Heavyweight at the end of his career.
Do I really need to explain myself further?
Like I said, both Leonard and Hearns were MUCH bigger men.
Comment
Comment