Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[travestyny]

Yo, ADP02, is it true that you refuse to pay your debt from the last debate in which you lost 4-0? Instead you say I manipulated the minds of 4 judges and you refuse to honor the bet, right?

Don't you think you should admit that you lost, and pay your debt like a damn man instead of crying, you pvssy?????

[travestyny]

LOOK AT THIS SHlT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THESE TOPICS THAT YOU DUCKED, ADP???? HUH???? HUH????? PLEASE TELL ME! LOOKS LIKE YOU BEEN DOING MOST OF THE DUCKING IN HERE, WITH YOUR VAGUE BULLSHlT:

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

AND IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHO CHALLENGED WHOM FIRST????

1. I OFFERED THE REMATCH FIRST. YOU DECLINED.

2. YOU ARE IN NO POSITION TO OFFER ME SHlT AFTER I ROASTED YOU 4-0.

3. I OFFERED YOU THE ORIGINAL TOPIC OF OUR ORIGINAL DEBATE FIRST..

This time he said he will show up. Let's see if he keeps his word.

The issue: He's claiming that WADA measures EPO as a threshold substance. I disagree. We will need some unbiased judges to present our information to, and then we can get a final decision that we will both agree to accept.

YOU DECLINED!!!!!

AND DON'T SAY IT WASN'T ABOUT THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES BECAUSE YOU ALREADY GOT CAUGHT OUT THERE:

Sample A is a mixture of those 2 urine samples. There the second is diluting the initial one.

b) Threshold substances, there can be traces but the delay and dilution will drive down the numbers

ARE YOU ENJOYING GETTING THE SHlT KICKED OUT OF YOU AGAIN???

R.I.P.

[ADP02]

It is called the top 10 list but I see that there is room to increase this!!!

See, the TRUTH is in this thread. I just finished telling you that:
I started this thread and CHALLENGED YOU not the other way around!!!!!


So once you get that part straight then your answers are answered already.


I want to make this CHALLENGE for these reasons.
- We argued on this for 2 months now.
- Lets see whose English is better! Meaning, who interpreted the CAS panels' statements correctly, you or me?
- This shoots down what you said 1.5 years ago!!!




BUT


Only 1 of us is DUCKING!!!!!!


See the problem here, English teacher? WTF!!!!



Lastly, YOU DEFLECTED!!!!

Why were you ready to start and discuss the judges but now you placed all those roadblocks?




Your post of me DUCKING, hilarious! You must hate yourself now!

DUCKER!!!!!!

KABADABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!



.
.

DID YOU NOT ACCEPT AND THEN DECLINE?????

Did you just DUCK, I mean DEFLECT, I mean LIE ….


I think you did all 3. AMAZING!!!!



English teacher, why are you having trouble responding to direct questions? I thought you are a PRO!

[travestyny]

Did you just DUCK, I mean DEFLECT, I mean LIE ….


I think you did all 3. AMAZING!!!!



English teacher, why are you having trouble responding to direct questions? I thought you are a PRO!

YOU GOT IT BACKWARDS, PROJECTOR. LMAOOOO

LOOK AT THIS SHlT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THESE TOPICS THAT YOU DUCKED, ADP???? HUH???? HUH????? PLEASE TELL ME! LOOKS LIKE YOU BEEN DOING MOST OF THE DUCKING IN HERE, WITH YOUR VAGUE BULLSHlT:

You could have just said: Is the BAP test inherently a threshold test

ADP DECLINED!

TOPIC: THE CASE BERGMAN VS. USADA CONSISTED OF NO THRESHOLD CRITERIA.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IN THAT COURT CASE WAS A 80% THRESHOLD TEST.

ADP DECLINED

Topic: In the case USADA vs. Bergman, the BAP test served as a threshold type test.

ADP DECLINED

TOPIC: THE BAP TEST IS INHERENTLY A THRESHOLD TEST, and had a threshold of 80% in the Bergman case!

ADP DECLINED

What's up, pvssy? You going to answer? I mean, you keep claiming that you won and that I duped someone. But when I offered you a rematch, you renounced your statements!!!!!

That's called putting up the white flag, bltch You're done. Unless you want that rematch. Let me know, yea?

ADP DECLINED

Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.

Yes or no?

ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!

[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

AND IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHO CHALLENGED WHOM FIRST????

1. I OFFERED THE REMATCH FIRST. YOU DECLINED.

2. YOU ARE IN NO POSITION TO OFFER ME SHlT AFTER I ROASTED YOU 4-0.

3. I OFFERED YOU THE ORIGINAL TOPIC OF OUR ORIGINAL DEBATE FIRST..

This time he said he will show up. Let's see if he keeps his word.

The issue: He's claiming that WADA measures EPO as a threshold substance. I disagree. We will need some unbiased judges to present our information to, and then we can get a final decision that we will both agree to accept.

YOU DECLINED!!!!!

AND DON'T SAY IT WASN'T ABOUT THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES BECAUSE YOU ALREADY GOT CAUGHT OUT THERE:

Sample A is a mixture of those 2 urine samples. There the second is diluting the initial one.

b) Threshold substances, there can be traces but the delay and dilution will drive down the numbers

ARE YOU ENJOYING GETTING THE SHlT KICKED OUT OF YOU AGAIN???

R.I.P.

[ADP02]

Yo, ADP02, is it true that you refuse to pay your debt from the last debate in which you lost 4-0? Instead you say I manipulated the minds of 4 judges and you refuse to honor the bet, right?

Don't you think you should admit that you lost, and pay your debt like a damn man instead of crying, you pvssy?????

LOOK AT THIS SHlT. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THESE TOPICS THAT YOU DUCKED, ADP???? HUH???? HUH????? PLEASE TELL ME! LOOKS LIKE YOU BEEN DOING MOST OF THE DUCKING IN HERE, WITH YOUR VAGUE BULLSHlT:

ADP DECLINED!


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP DECLINED


ADP ACCEPTED......AND THEN DECLINED ONE POST LATER!





AND IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHO CHALLENGED WHOM FIRST????

1. I OFFERED THE REMATCH FIRST. YOU DECLINED.

2. YOU ARE IN NO POSITION TO OFFER ME SHlT AFTER I ROASTED YOU 4-0.

3. I OFFERED YOU THE ORIGINAL TOPIC OF OUR ORIGINAL DEBATE FIRST..


YOU DECLINED!!!!!

AND DON'T SAY IT WASN'T ABOUT THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES BECAUSE YOU ALREADY GOT CAUGHT OUT THERE:



[CENTER]ARE YOU ENJOYING GETTING THE SHlT KICKED OUT OF YOU AGAIN???

Are you saying that I missed something below? Let me know!!!!


I gotta still check below but is this what you want me to add?
11)
Travestyny: Why did you not challenge me on something else? …..

ADP02: AGAIN, this is what we were arguing on for 2 months. lets get it on!




12)
Travestyny: Why did you not challenge me on a rematch of last year? …..

ADP02: I said we can do that ….. after this challenge! lets get it on!





English teacher, who started this thread?
Who has yet to fully accept the challenge made by the thread starter, me?
Read below and you have your answer





Come one, come all, come check it out …… the QUACK is here!!!


IT IS OFFICIALLY DUCK SEASON!!!!










David Letterman's TOP 10 LIST of Travestyny's DUCKING EXCUSES!!!!




1)
Travestyny: Scope cannot be on all non-threshold susbtances.

ADP02: Well, even though you used those comments for ALL non-threshold susbtances I will agree to omit that. OK DEAL, lets get it on!



2)
Travestyny: Scope cannot be on blood testing just urine testing methodologies.

ADP02: OK DEAL, lets get it on!


3)
Travestyny: Lets make the discussion on a different thing ….. the case only.

ADP02: I started the thread and challenged you on something completely different. Lets get it on!



4)
Travestyny: Well those statements of mine that I made a "BILLION" times and told you that I couldn't be more CLEAR, they are VAGUE! Can you make my statements more clear?

ADP02: OK DEAL, lets get it on!



5)
Travestyny: Well, now I want you to first give me points …..

ADP02: What I will do is this. You come up with a wager that will take care of the 2 debates. Come up with a reasonable number. Lets get it on!



6)
Travestyny: Well, the thing is I do not trust you. How about you do not give me the points this time …..

ADP02: What I will do is this. I can give the points to a 3rd party Lets get it on!



7)
Travestyny: Well, I really do not care about the BAP testing discussion and well, lets just let it go and enjoy life …..

ADP02: We have been arguing about this for 2 months now!!!!! Actually, even more since you brought this up 1.5 years ago as well!!! Now that I challenged you, you want to tell me, stop? Lets get it on!





8)
Travestyny: You said that what I said was really not in scope in one of your post, so there!

ADP02: This is the dumbest one of all of your DUCKs. We have been arguing about this for 2 months now!!!!! Actually, even more since you brought this up 1.5 years ago as well!!! Lets get it on!





9)
Travestyny: Travestyny recaps his DUCKs to show us all that he will say anything to DUCK!!!!

ADP02: In response to your DUCK.
- You LIED 1.5 years ago to the judges and me!
- YOU ARE A LIAR NOW
- YOU EVEN WERE ACCEPTING THIS CHALLENGE DUMBO - but YOUR constant roadblocks after "I WORKED WITH YOU for each roadblock, well, WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!
- This is NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!




10) Travestyny: Work with me! You have not done enough!!!

ADP02: YOU have qualified to be called a JOKE!!!! This is too funny.


This should be a STICKY!!!





Upgraded DUCK STATUS!!!!

You brought this to a new level!!!


Let me know when you find your BALLs. They have left the building!!!! LOL




Unbelievably embarrassing!!!

IT IS OFFICIALLY DUCK SEASON!!!!


Hilarious!!!!




.

[travestyny]

Are you saying that I missed something below? Let me know!!!!

YOU MISSED THIS

Would you be willing to rematch Travestyny in the Thunderdome with regular posters as judges, though?

Unfortunately, I do not think that you can get any objective experts. So there is no point asking.

FOR SOMEONE WHO WAS SO CONFIDENT HE WON, YOU SURE DID TURN BlTCH. LMAOOOO

R.I.P.

[travestyny]

YOU WANT ANOTHER DEBATE. YOU HAVE ONE CHANCE. HERE’S WHAT YOU HAVE TO AGREE TO:

1. Admit you lost the previous debate.

2. Pay the withstanding debt from the previous debate.

3. Apologize to me and the judges for stating that we conspired to cheat you in the previous debate.

4. Admit that it was YOU who tried to change the scope.

5. Admit that you thought EPO was a threshold substance.

6. Admit that you ducked a rematch.

7. Admit that this was indeed all about Mayweather testing circa May 2nd, 2015.

8. Admit that the BAP was out of scope of our debate.


ALL OF THIS CAN BE VERIFIED WITH FACTS!!!!!! SO THERE IS NO REASON FOR YOU TO DECLINE!

SIMPLE. WHAT’S YOUR ANSWER? AGREED OR NO?

[ADP02]

YOU MISSED THIS

FOR SOMEONE WHO WAS SO CONFIDENT HE WON, YOU SURE DID TURN BlTCH. LMAOOOO

That will be a hard task, true … oh wait, I said it! See, I was right!


NEXT!

[travestyny]

That will be a hard task, true … oh wait, I said it! See, I was right!


NEXT!

So you admit that you DUCKED the rematch? Going to add that to my list. Thanks!


You better hurry and accept. That list is growing.

[ADP02]

YOU WANT ANOTHER DEBATE. YOU HAVE ONE CHANCE. HERE’S WHAT YOU HAVE TO AGREE TO:

1. Admit you lost the previous debate.

2. Pay the withstanding debt from the previous debate.

3. Apologize to me and the judges for stating that we conspired to cheat you in the previous debate.

4. Admit that it was YOU who tried to change the scope.

5. Admit that you thought EPO was a threshold substance.


ALL OF THIS CAN BE VERIFIED WITH FACTS!!!!!! SO THERE IS NO REASON FOR YOU TO DECLINE!

SIMPLE. WHAT’S YOUR ANSWER? AGREED OR NO?

English teacher, wake up! You are confused, AGAIN!!!

- Who started this thread?
- What was the TS challenging you on?

So why on earth are you still not understanding this? I thought English was your first language?


More importantly, why are you DUCKING?

Why were you ready to get the judges and start this before BUT not now?

You have yet to answer these questions DEFLECTOR.






REASON: You are no longer confident in your LIES.




IT IS OFFICIALLY DUCK SEASON!!!!


Hilarious!!!!