Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

[travestyny]

Don't believe anything ADP02 says. He's a liar.


The end.







That's all you need to know.


Oh yeah and he's the type that won't honor a bet. Yeah. You know those guys.

This whole debate he is trying to have in here...turns out it's about the debate we had over a year ago. He's trying to link it to an old criteria that was out of the scope of our last debate.

AND JUST LIKE YOU SAID, HE IS A LIAR AND GOT BUSTED LYING.

He kept claiming I was trying to change the scope. He whined over pages and pages claiming I was trying to change the scope. Kept saying...stay in scope. Proof:

OH and another thing. Why do you not stay in scope?

The funny thing is, I busted him admitting that the old criteria was OUT OF SCOPE. PROOF:

2) WHILE OUT OF SCOPE, this specific criteria had an "and/OR" in which the panel was describing. In that if there were "additional evidence" that can be used to show evidence that the athlete was using EPO, it can be used.

But LOOK AT HOW HE TRIED TO DEFEND THIS IN HERE.

HE NOW IS CLAIMING THAT JUST BECAUSE THEY MENTIONED THAT CRITERIA IN A PIECE OF INFORMATION I PRESENTED, THAT SUCCESSFULLY CHANGED THE SCOPE.

You made it be part of the SCOPE.

SO BEFORE IT WAS STICK TO THE SCOPE. BUT WHEN I BUSTED HIM EXPLICITLY SAYING THAT THE CRITERIA HE WANTS TO USE WAS OUT OF SCOPE...THEN IT'S......NO NO NO...YOU CHANGED THE SCOPE BECAUSE THAT WAS MENTIONED SOMEWHERE IN YOUR EVIDENCE.


HE IS BY FAR THE MOST DISHONEST PERSON I'VE EVER HAD TO DEAL WITH!!!! AND HE'S FVVCKING SAD. CAN YOU BELIEVE A GROWN MAN COULD ACT LIKE SUCH A LITTLE BlTCH? CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT SHlT? I WAS SHOCKED HE WOULD EVEN TRY TO SAY SUCH A THING AFTER CRYING ABOUT THE SCOPE FOR PAGES!!!!!!!

THIS DUDE IS A SCUMBAG!!!! AND HE STILL REFUSES TO PAY HIS DEBT FROM LOSING 4-0

[ADP02]

You still going???? I really don’t know how you could live with yourself after being proven to be such an utter bumbling bltch. So sorry that I won't be joining you for another 90 page thread. I've said everything I have to say in post 164.

You've already been given your marching orders, son.

1. Admit you lost the previous debate.

2. Pay the withstanding debt from the previous debate.

3. Apologize to me and the judges for stating that we conspired to cheat you in the previous debate.

Until then:



But on the bright side, maybe if you can do all of that, you'll gain some closure and you won't have to cry over your 4-0 loss anymore. I'll pray for your soul.

Come one, come all, come check it out …… the QUACK is here!!!


IT IS OFFICIALLY DUCK SEASON!!!!










David Letterman's TOP 10 LIST of Travestyny's DUCKING EXCUSES!!!!




1)
Travestyny: Scope cannot be on all non-threshold susbtances.

ADP02: Well, even though you used those comments for ALL non-threshold susbtances I will agree to omit that. OK DEAL, lets get it on!



2)
Travestyny: Scope cannot be on blood testing just urine testing methodologies.

ADP02: OK DEAL, lets get it on!


3)
Travestyny: Lets make the discussion on a different thing ….. the case only.

ADP02: I started the thread and challenged you on something completely different. Lets get it on!



4)
Travestyny: Well those statements of mine that I made a "BILLION" times and told you that I couldn't be more CLEAR, they are VAGUE! Can you make my statements more clear?

ADP02: OK DEAL, lets get it on!



5)
Travestyny: Well, now I want you to first give me points …..

ADP02: What I will do is this. You come up with a wager that will take care of the 2 debates. Come up with a reasonable number. Lets get it on!



6)
Travestyny: Well, the thing is I do not trust you. How about you do not give me the points this time …..

ADP02: What I will do is this. I can give the points to a 3rd party Lets get it on!



7)
Travestyny: Well, I really do not care about the BAP testing discussion and well, lets just let it go and enjoy life …..

ADP02: We have been arguing about this for 2 months now!!!!! Actually, even more since you brought this up 1.5 years ago as well!!! Now that I challenged you, you want to tell me, stop? Lets get it on!





8)
Travestyny: You said that what I said was really not in scope in one of your post, so there!

ADP02: This is the dumbest one of all of your DUCKs. We have been arguing about this for 2 months now!!!!! Actually, even more since you brought this up 1.5 years ago as well!!! Lets get it on!





9)
Travestyny: Travestyny recaps his DUCKs to show us all that he will say anything to DUCK!!!!

ADP02: In response to your DUCK.
- You LIED 1.5 years ago to the judges and me!
- YOU ARE A LIAR NOW
- YOU EVEN WERE ACCEPTING THIS CHALLENGE DUMBO - but YOUR constant roadblocks after "I WORKED WITH YOU for each roadblock, well, WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!
- This is NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!




10) Travestyny: Work with me! You have not done enough!!!

ADP02: YOU have qualified to be called a JOKE!!!! This is too funny.


This should be a STICKY!!!





Upgraded DUCK STATUS!!!!

You brought this to a new level!!!


Let me know when you find your BALLs. They have left the building!!!! LOL




Unbelievably embarrassing!!!

IT IS OFFICIALLY DUCK SEASON!!!!


Hilarious!!!!




.

DUDE YOU AREN'T FOOLING ANYONE. WE ALL KNOW EXACTLY WHO YOU ARE.

WE ALL KNOW YOU TRIED TO CHEAT!!!!! SAYING THAT NOW YOU ARE WILLING TO GIVE POINTS TO A 3RD PERSON WHEN YOU KNOW YOU LOST???? LMAOOO


PAY YOUR FVVCKING DEBT, BlTCH. NO ONE IS GOING TO READ YOUR ESSAYS. You are DESPERATE but you WON'T EVEN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, WON'T ADMIT YOU TRIED TO CHEAT, AND WON'T ADMIT THAT YOU LOST!!!!


AND YOU WON'T PAY THE DEBT THAT YOU OWE FROM THE LAST DEBATE THAT YOU LOST 4-0 AND CLAIMED EVERYONE CONSPIRED TO CHEAT YOU, BUT YOU TURNED DOWN A REMATCH NUMEROUS TIMES BECAUSE YOU REALIZE YOU'RE FULL OF SHlT. JUST STOP IT. PAY YOUR DEBT, BlTCH, AND ADMIT YOU LOST!

There is only 1 reason why you DUCKED!!!!

and

I knew you would!!!!!


Beautiful!!!!!!!


Work with you? I did!!!! You did NOT.



As for points, you got to be kidding me?
This was a WIN-WIN bullet proof solution.
I gave you the opportunity to get as many points as you want to bet. All you had to do is win.

BUT

You couldn't lose any of your points because if I won, I didn't even want any of your points.


So that excuse of yours is pure BS!!!!

[travestyny]

[SIZE="3"][B][I][I]Come one, come all, come check it out ……

Dude, are you trying to save face???? I guarantee you probably less than 3 people care about this thread

Who are you trying to prove something to? Yourself?


PAY YOUR DEBT YOU LYING, WELCHING BlTCH


By the way, go look at Spoon's thread, that not only got destroyed, but Zaroku mentioned how he distinctly remembers you crying over how the scope shouldn't be changed

So why are you now trying to change the scope? You are a fuvvckign disgrace.

PAY YOUR DEBT YOU 4-0 LOSING BlTCH, AND ADMIT THAT YOU LOST. NOTHING WORSE THAN A CRY BABY BET WELCHING BlTCH!!!!!!

R.I.P.

[travestyny]

Come one, come all, come check it out …… the QUACK is here!!!


IT IS OFFICIALLY DUCK SEASON!!!!


David Letterman's TOP 10 LIST of Travestyny's DUCKING EXCUSES!!!!




1)
Travestyny: Scope cannot be on all non-threshold susbtances.

ADP02: Well, even though you used those comments for ALL non-threshold susbtances I will agree to omit that. OK DEAL, lets get it on!



2)
Travestyny: Scope cannot be on blood testing just urine testing methodologies.

ADP02: OK DEAL, lets get it on!


3)
Travestyny: Lets make the discussion on a different thing ….. the case only.

ADP02: I started the thread and challenged you on something completely different. Lets get it on!



4)
Travestyny: Well those statements of mine that I made a "BILLION" times and told you that I couldn't be more CLEAR, they are VAGUE! Can you make my statements more clear?

ADP02: OK DEAL, lets get it on!



5)
Travestyny: Well, now I want you to first give me points …..

ADP02: What I will do is this. You come up with a wager that will take care of the 2 debates. Come up with a reasonable number. Lets get it on!



6)
Travestyny: Well, the thing is I do not trust you. How about you do not give me the points this time …..

ADP02: What I will do is this. I can give the points to a 3rd party Lets get it on!



7)
Travestyny: Well, I really do not care about the BAP testing discussion and well, lets just let it go and enjoy life …..

ADP02: We have been arguing about this for 2 months now!!!!! Actually, even more since you brought this up 1.5 years ago as well!!! Now that I challenged you, you want to tell me, stop? Lets get it on!





8)
Travestyny: You said that what I said was really not in scope in one of your post, so there!

ADP02: This is the dumbest one of all of your DUCKs. We have been arguing about this for 2 months now!!!!! Actually, even more since you brought this up 1.5 years ago as well!!! Lets get it on!





9)
Travestyny: Travestyny recaps his DUCKs to show us all that he will say anything to DUCK!!!!

ADP02: In response to your DUCK.
- You LIED 1.5 years ago to the judges and me!
- YOU ARE A LIAR NOW
- YOU EVEN WERE ACCEPTING THIS CHALLENGE DUMBO - but YOUR constant roadblocks after "I WORKED WITH YOU for each roadblock, well, WHAT A JOKE!!!!!!
- This is NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!!!




10) Travestyny: Work with me! You have not done enough!!!

ADP02: YOU have qualified to be called a JOKE!!!! This is too funny.

OH BY THE WAY. LET ME ANSWER TO THIS AND EXPOSE YOU LYING YET AGAIN!!!!!


DIDN'T I AGREE TO A CHALLENGE HERE, THEN YOU AGREED...THEN I SAID LET'S GET JUDGES....AND YOU BACKED OUT????

PROOF:

Dude, it's not a threshold in that case. Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.


Yes or no?

Ok

Challenge is on!

Thank you.


You gotta be a ****** muthafvvcka to challenge me on a case that says BAP is not a threshold...and argue that it is a threshold


Jesus Christ. Who you have in mind for judges?

I just saw this

Challenge is on my post of your post!!!

Everyone is wrong according to travesty
because the Cas panel said so!!!

SO WHO DUCKED WHOM BlTCH!!!!!

R.I.P.


[img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

[ADP02]

This whole debate he is trying to have in here...turns out it's about the debate we had over a year ago. He's trying to link it to an old criteria that was out of the scope of our last debate.

AND JUST LIKE YOU SAID, HE IS A LIAR AND GOT BUSTED LYING.

He kept claiming I was trying to change the scope. He whined over pages and pages claiming I was trying to change the scope. Kept saying...stay in scope. Proof:




The funny thing is, I busted him admitting that the old criteria was OUT OF SCOPE. PROOF:




But LOOK AT HOW HE TRIED TO DEFEND THIS IN HERE.

HE NOW IS CLAIMING THAT JUST BECAUSE THEY MENTIONED THAT CRITERIA IN A PIECE OF INFORMATION I PRESENTED, THAT SUCCESSFULLY CHANGED THE SCOPE.




SO BEFORE IT WAS STICK TO THE SCOPE. BUT WHEN I BUSTED HIM EXPLICITLY SAYING THAT THE CRITERIA HE WANTS TO USE WAS OUT OF SCOPE...THEN IT'S......NO NO NO...YOU CHANGED THE SCOPE BECAUSE THAT WAS MENTIONED SOMEWHERE IN YOUR EVIDENCE.


HE IS BY FAR THE MOST DISHONEST PERSON I'VE EVER HAD TO DEAL WITH!!!! AND HE'S FVVCKING SAD. CAN YOU BELIEVE A GROWN MAN COULD ACT LIKE SUCH A LITTLE BlTCH? CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT SHlT? I WAS SHOCKED HE WOULD EVEN TRY TO SAY SUCH A THING AFTER CRYING ABOUT THE SCOPE FOR PAGES!!!!!!!

THIS DUDE IS A SCUMBAG!!!! AND HE STILL REFUSES TO PAY HIS DEBT FROM LOSING 4-0

LIAR of the TRUTH is YOU.

1)
"BAP test & other criteria"

Those 2 are linked when the CAS panel is discussing this. Right?

You tried to tell the judges and me that EPO cannot have threshold type tests.


That statement clearly has "BAP and other criteria". It was mainly about BAP but here is the thing.

The LIE is that BAP has threshold tests. So your statement was a LIE!!!

How can you go to me and the judges and say that the CAS panel is stating that there are no threshold tests when BAP has threshold tests?


Travestyny was placed in a corner and had to BS and say, well, BAP also does not have threshold tests.

Travestyny has been saying this for 2 months now and these are the same statements that were in that debate last year.


Therefore I placed this challenge on Travestyny!!!



So now he has a TOP 10 LIST of DUCKING!!!!!


2) YES, you bet Travestyny was constantly trying to change the scope of the debate.


He would use my posts when it served him and not use my posts if it didn't. Same with his!

but the limits were already set!!!!

Travestyny said:
- There are no threshold, ratios, scores, none of that.
I found them …. so he tries to change the scope.

- not for the presumptive nor the confirmation test.
HE saw something that the judges may interpret as a threshold so he said, there may be judges but do not look at the presumptive tests

- It was not about the intensity of the bands ….
Well there was but you tried to state that it wasn't important (doubling down on ******ity in the hopes that the judges do not get any of this)

- there are no thresholds
What about ABP …. Travestyny ignores ABP comments until 1.5 years later, when he forgot what he said last year, he admits to ABP thresholds for EPO …. but he even fought that being a EPO test!!!! LOL

- WADA never had threshold tests BUT he saw some so he said only what I said counts not what he said!

BUT


Only limit to the discussion was that we were discussing EPO testing not threshold susbtances.

Go DEFLECT THAT!!!


BUT SO WHAT?


This dude stated several times that he was ready to debate BUT then came the roadblocks!!!




QUESTION for the DEFLECTOR and DUCKER!!!!

Why were none of those roadblocks important when you thought you had a chance to win based on some other challenge???


You said something like, "lets start and Who you have in mind for judges?!!!!" LOL

That is all I need to prove my point!!!



You do not even like yourself right now. Go check out that post of yours on what you think of a DUCKER!!!! LOL



Hilarious!!!!


.



.

[ADP02]

OH BY THE WAY. LET ME ANSWER TO THIS AND EXPOSE YOU LYING YET AGAIN!!!!!


DIDN'T I AGREE TO A CHALLENGE HERE, THEN YOU AGREED...THEN I SAID LET'S GET JUDGES....AND YOU BACKED OUT????

PROOF:

SO WHO DUCKED WHOM BlTCH!!!!!

Thanks for stating what I said in my previous post. So do not deflect.


Why were you ready to pick the judges but not now, DELFECTOR, LIAR and DUCKER?




and these post of your shows that you are a LIAR.


How did I respond after that?

I corrected you and said that I was responding to my challenge. All someone needs to do is read the previous posts of me constantly stating that you are SPINNING and they will call you out as the LIAR.

and

Go check out my post. Did you see a quote on your spin? LIAR


SPINNING to you means I agree with you?

Reminding YOU (again now) constantly that I am challenging you and that I started the post, not the other way around, what did that mean to you?

[travestyny]

LIAR of the TRUTH is YOU.

1)
"BAP test & other criteria"

Those 2 are linked when the CAS panel is discussing this. Right?

You tried to tell the judges and me that EPO cannot have threshold type tests.


That statement clearly has "BAP and other criteria". It was mainly about BAP but here is the thing.

The LIE is that BAP has threshold tests. So your statement was a LIE!!!

How can you go to me and the judges and say that the CAS panel is stating that there are no threshold tests when BAP has threshold tests?

LMAOOOOOOO. NO THEY WERE NOT CONNECTED YOU IMBECILE. IT DIDN'T SAY THAT WHEN TAKEN ALL TOGETHER, THEY AREN'T THRESHOLDS. IT SAYS NONE OF THEM ARE THRESHOLDS, YOU MORON. AND TRYING TO CLAIM THAT BECAUSE IT SAYS BAP MEANS THAT IT BECOMES PART OF THE SCOPE IS ******, YOU DUMB TWAT. YOU ARE A FVVCKING ******!!!!!

Travestyny was placed in a corner and had to BS and say, well, BAP also does not have threshold tests.

Travestyny has been saying this for 2 months now and these are the same statements that were in that debate last year.


Therefore I placed this challenge on Travestyny!!!

READ IT AND WEEP YOU DUMB BlTCH:

The fact is that*the BAP*and the other interpretative*criteria*are used to declare*not a threshold*of human body production but*rather*an image*from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

YOU MORON. IS ENGLISH YOUR FIRST LANGUAGE?????? YOU WERE CLEARLY WRONG AND THAT'S WHY YOU DECLINED A REMATCH OVER AND OVER. BUT BUT BUT...I'M DUCKING? LMAOOOOOOO. LET'S ASK SHOULDER ROLL HOW MANY TIMES HE ASKED IF YOU WANTED A REMATCH AND YOU DECLINED!

QUESTION for the DEFLECTOR and DUCKER!!!!

Why were none of those roadblocks important when you thought you had a chance to win based on some other challenge???

WE JUST ACCEPTED A CHALLENGE YOU LYING TWAT. I ALREADY SHOWED YOU THE PROOF!!!!!!!

Dude, it's not a threshold in that case. Just agree to the challenge.

So you're going to argue that in that case, the BAP is a threshold test, right? That's all I want to know.


Yes or no?

Ok

Challenge is on!

Thank you.


You gotta be a ****** muthafvvcka to challenge me on a case that says BAP is not a threshold...and argue that it is a threshold


Jesus Christ. Who you have in mind for judges?

I just saw this

Challenge is on my post of your post!!!

Everyone is wrong according to travesty
because the Cas panel said so!!!

AFTER THAT WHICH HAPPENED ON FVVCKING PAGE 9 OF YOUR BULLSHlT, I TOLD YOU FVCCK YOU. YOU WASTED MY TIME FOR 9 FVVCKING PAGES, FINALLY ACCEPTED, I SAID LET'S GET JUDGES, AND YOU DECLINED. SO I SAID FVVCK OFF. IT'S ALL RIGHT THERE FOR ANYONE TO SEE YOU DUMB, LYING BlTCH!!!!!

So now he has a TOP 10 LIST of DUCKING!!!!!


2) YES, you bet Travestyny was constantly trying to change the scope of the debate.


He would use my posts when it served him and not use my posts if it didn't. Same with his!

but the limits were already set!!!!

Travestyny said:
- There are no threshold, ratios, scores, none of that.
I found them …. so he tries to change the scope.

- not for the presumptive nor the confirmation test.
HE saw something that the judges may interpret as a threshold so he said, there may be judges but do not look at the presumptive tests

- It was not about the intensity of the bands ….
Well there was but you tried to state that it wasn't important (doubling down on ******ity in the hopes that the judges do not get any of this)

- there are no thresholds
What about ABP …. Travestyny ignores ABP comments until 1.5 years later, when he forgot what he said last year, he admits to ABP thresholds for EPO …. but he even fought that being a EPO test!!!! LOL

- WADA never had threshold tests BUT he saw some so he said only what I said counts not what he said!

BUT


Only limit to the discussion was that we were discussing EPO testing not threshold susbtances.

Go DEFLECT THAT!!!


BUT SO WHAT?


This dude stated several times that he was ready to debate BUT then came the roadblocks!!!


You said something like, "lets start and Who you have in mind for judges?!!!!" LOL

That is all I need to prove my point!!!



You do not even like yourself right now. Go check out that post of yours on what you think of a DUCKER!!!! LOL



Hilarious!!!!


.



.

WHAT THE ACTUAL FVVCK ARE YOU STILL CRYING OVER THIS FOR. YOU WERE OFFERED A REMATCH A SHlTLOAD OF TIMES AND YOU REFUSED. YOU STATED THAT YOU WOULD ONLY ACCEPT IF WADA EXPERTS WERE THE JUDGES GIVE THE FVVCK UP. YOU LOST. IT'S OVER!!!!!

R.I.P.

[travestyny]

Thanks for stating what I said in my previous post. So do not deflect.


Why were you ready to pick the judges but not now, DELFECTOR, LIAR and DUCKER?




and these post of your shows that you are a LIAR.


How did I respond after that?

I corrected you and said that I was responding to my challenge. All someone needs to do is read the previous posts of me constantly stating that you are SPINNING and they will call you out as the LIAR.

and

Go check out my post. Did you see a quote on your spin? LIAR


SPINNING to you means I agree with you?

Reminding YOU (again now) constantly that I am challenging you and that I started the post, not the other way around, what did that mean to you?

WHY IS THIS ALL REALLY ABOUT THE LAST DEBATE BUT YOU REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE REMATCH OVER AND OVER!!!!!????

I ACCEPTED A CHALLENGE IN HERE. THEN YOU ACCEPTED. I SAID YOU'RE ****** TO HAVE ACCEPTED. LET'S GET THE JUDGES. THEN YOU TUCKED TAIL LIKE A BROKE DlCK DOG AND DECLINED IMMEDIATELY AFTR YOU JUST ACCEPTED!!!! YOU DUCKING BlTCH. DON'T MAKE ME GO GET THE QUOTATIONS ABOUT YOU DUCKING THE REMATCH, TOO! DON'T EVER CALL SOMEONE A DUCKER. DON'T EVER CALL SOMEONE A LIAR. DON'T EVER CALL SOMEONE A DEFLECTOR. YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT REMATCH NOW UNLESS YOU PAY YOUR FVVCKING DEBT FROM YOUR 4-0 LOSS, YOU DUMB TWAT. I KNOW IT KILLS YOU. CHOKE ON THAT 4-0 LOSS AND DIE!

R.I.P.

[ADP02]

LMAOOOOOOO. NO THEY WERE NOT CONNECTED YOU IMBECILE. IT DIDN'T SAY THAT WHEN TAKEN ALL TOGETHER, THEY AREN'T THRESHOLDS. IT SAYS NONE OF THEM ARE THRESHOLDS, YOU MORON. AND TRYING TO CLAIM THAT BECAUSE IT SAYS BAP MEANS THAT IT BECOMES PART OF THE SCOPE IS ******, YOU DUMB TWAT. YOU ARE A FVVCKING ******!!!!!




READ IT AND WEEP YOU DUMB BlTCH:



YOU MORON. IS ENGLISH YOUR FIRST LANGUAGE?????? YOU WERE CLEARLY WRONG AND THAT'S WHY YOU DECLINED A REMATCH OVER AND OVER. BUT BUT BUT...I'M DUCKING? LMAOOOOOOO. LET'S ASK SHOULDER ROLL HOW MANY TIMES HE ASKED IF YOU WANTED A REMATCH AND YOU DECLINED!



WE JUST ACCEPTED A CHALLENGE YOU LYING TWAT. I ALREADY SHOWED YOU THE PROOF!!!!!!!











AFTER THAT WHICH HAPPENED ON FVVCKING PAGE 9 OF YOUR BULLSHlT, I TOLD YOU FVCCK YOU. YOU WASTED MY TIME FOR 9 FVVCKING PAGES, FINALLY ACCEPTED, I SAID LET'S GET JUDGES, AND YOU DECLINED. SO I SAID FVVCK OFF. IT'S ALL RIGHT THERE FOR ANYONE TO SEE YOU DUMB, LYING BlTCH!!!!!





WHAT THE ACTUAL FVVCK ARE YOU STILL CRYING OVER THIS FOR. YOU WERE OFFERED A REMATCH A SHlTLOAD OF TIMES AND YOU REFUSED. YOU STATED THAT YOU WOULD ONLY ACCEPT IF WADA EXPERTS WERE THE JUDGES GIVE THE FVVCK UP. YOU LOST. IT'S OVER!!!!!

R.I.P.

WHY IS THIS ALL REALLY ABOUT THE LAST DEBATE BUT YOU REFUSED TO ACCEPT THE REMATCH OVER AND OVER!!!!!????

I ACCEPTED A CHALLENGE IN HERE. THEN YOU ACCEPTED. I SAID YOU'RE ****** TO HAVE ACCEPTED. LET'S GET THE JUDGES. THEN YOU TUCKED TAIL LIKE A BROKE DlCK DOG AND DECLINED IMMEDIATELY AFTR YOU JUST ACCEPTED!!!! YOU DUCKING BlTCH. DON'T MAKE ME GO GET THE QUOTATIONS ABOUT YOU DUCKING THE REMATCH! YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THAT NOW UNLESS YOU PAY YOUR FVVCKING DEBT, YOU DUMB TWAT. I KNOW IT KILLS YOU. CHOKE ON THAT 4-0 LOSS AND DIE!

It is called the top 10 list but I see that there is room to increase this!!!

See, the TRUTH is in this thread. I just finished telling you that:
I started this thread and CHALLENGED YOU not the other way around!!!!!


So once you get that part straight then your answers are answered already.


I want to make this CHALLENGE for these reasons.
- We argued on this for 2 months now.
- Lets see whose English is better! Meaning, who interpreted the CAS panels' statements correctly, you or me?
- This shoots down what you said 1.5 years ago!!!




BUT


Only 1 of us is DUCKING!!!!!!


See the problem here, English teacher? WTF!!!!



Lastly, YOU DEFLECTED!!!!

Why were you ready to start and discuss the judges but now you placed all those roadblocks?




Your post of me DUCKING, hilarious! You must hate yourself now!

DUCKER!!!!!!

KABADABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!



.
.

[travestyny]

It is called the top 10 list but I see that there is room to increase this!!!

See, the TRUTH is in this thread. I just finished telling you that:
I started this thread and CHALLENGED YOU not the other way around!!!!!


So once you get that part straight then your answers are answered already.


I want to make this CHALLENGE for these reasons.
- We argued on this for 2 months now.
- Lets see whose English is better! Meaning, who interpreted the CAS panels' statements correctly, you or me?
- This shoots down what you said 1.5 years ago!!!




BUT


Only 1 of us is DUCKING!!!!!!


See the problem here, English teacher? WTF!!!!



Lastly, YOU DEFLECTED!!!!

Why were you ready to start and discuss the judges but now you placed all those roadblocks?




Your post of me DUCKING, hilarious! You must hate yourself now!

DUCKER!!!!!!

KABADABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!



.
.

DID YOU NOT ACCEPT AND THEN DECLINE?????