Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can non-threshold susbtances have threshold type tests

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Says the one who interpreted it to mean that the CAS panel was stating that they were correcting anyone who has ever called it a threshold type tests.

    and QUACKING for 140+ pages to AVOID the challenge!


    Now that is hilarious!!!!





    Oh, and you saying that you accepted then I had to interpret what that CLEAR post said to you then you QUACKED AGAIN!!!!




    .

    Comment


      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
      Says the one who interpreted it to mean that the CAS panel was stating that they were correcting anyone who has ever called it a threshold type tests.



      BECAUSE THEY WERE...BECAUSE IT'S NOT A THRESHOLD YOU MORON. YOU WON'T CHALLENGE ME ON IT. YOU WILL ONLY TRY TO INSERT 'CAN' FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF IT AND THEN STATE IT'S NOT ABOUT THE CASE IN PARTICULAR!!!! LMAOOOOOOOOOO.


      AND IT'S NOT EVEN RELEVANT WHEN YOU SAID IT'S OUT OF SCOPE YOU SCUMBAG!


      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post

      and QUACKING for 140+ pages to AVOID the challenge!


      Now that is hilarious!!!!

      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post


      Oh, and you saying that you accepted then I had to interpret what that CLEAR post said to you then you QUACKED AGAIN!!!!

      .
      YOU DON'T HAVE TO INTERPRET ANYTHING. I TOLD YOU TO LET THE JUDGE INTERPRET IT SINCE YOU KEEP WANTING TO ADD WORDS TO MY POST. YOU COULDN'T DO THAT BECAUSE YOU KNEW YOU HAD NOTHING! WHO DECLINED HAVING AN UNBIASED JUDGE INTERPRET THE QUOTATION. THAT SURE AS HELL WASN'T ME

      YOUR TOPIC WASN'T EVEN MY STATEMENT YOU COMPLETE IMBECILE. WHEN I ASKED YOU WHERE WAS THE WORD CAN, YOU SAID BECAUSE I SAID I CAN'T BE ANYMORE CLEAR. LMAOOOO


      YOU COMPLETELY EMBARRASSED YOURSELF!!!!
      Last edited by travestyny; 09-11-2018, 08:12 PM.

      Comment


        My statement:

        travestyny

        question a, b, and c:
        The court for arbitration of sport has corrected anyone that has ever called this a threshold test a number of times....because it is not a threshold test!!!!!

        The only thing that was ever referred to as a threshold was the old way of testing: The bap. And the court even said that is not a threshold test.

        where is the word can in that staement, adp? Oh....that's right. You said it's here in a different statement:

        i can't say that any more clearly.


        look how desprate you are. Lmaoooooo. So the can't is "i can't be anymore clear????"


        Here is your can, son. Have at it. But you ducked out didn't you!


        there is no threshold above which it can be said that there is repo.

        [img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

        Comment


          BOTTOM LINE IS, THIS CONTRADICTION IS THE PROOF THAT YOU LEGITIMATELY LOST!



          Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

          Originally posted by COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT
          there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance

          PAY UP, BlTCH!


          4-0!!!!!!



          ADP STILL CRYING:


          IT'S OVER.


          Last edited by travestyny; 09-11-2018, 08:38 PM.

          Comment


            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            BOTTOM LINE IS, THIS CONTRADICTION IS THE PROOF THAT YOU LEGITIMATELY LOST!










            PAY UP, BlTCH!


            4-0!!!!!!






            ADP STILL CRYING:



            IT'S OVER.




            See, you are a complete buffoon! You point to something and got it all wrong!


            Says the one who accepted and I needed to explain what he was accepting to then he declines!



            Says the one who has Ducked for 140+ pages!

            Comment


              Originally posted by ADP02 View Post


              See, you are a complete buffoon! You point to something and got it all wrong!


              Says the one who accepted and I needed to explain what he was accepting to then he declines!



              Says the one who has Ducked for 140+ pages!



              I GOT IT WRONG????....YET YOU LOST 4-0. DID 5 PEOPLE GET IT WRONG AND ONLY ADP GET IT RIGHT.



              I think NOT



              4-0 VICTORY UPHELD DUE TO ADP BEING TOO PVSSY TO ANSWER THE CALL!!!!!!




              4-0!!!!!!



              ADP STILL CRYING:


              IT'S OVER.


              Last edited by travestyny; 09-11-2018, 08:51 PM.

              Comment


                Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                Says the one who accepted and I needed to explain what he was accepting to then he declines!

                ACTUALLY....THIS IS WHAT YOU NEEDED TO EXPLAIN. WHY YOU DUCKED YOUR OWN CHALLENGE!!!!!

                Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                After 2 months, I decided to a DUEL. This was to prove that he CHEATED and LIED the first time around.
                Originally posted by travestyny
                ACCEPT THE PERMANENT BAN CHALLENGE. YOU PROVE I LIED AND CHEATED LIKE YOU SAID IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS THREAD, THEN I ACCEPT THE PERMANENT BAN. YOU FAIL, THEN YOU ACCEPT THE PERMANENT BAN. YOU DUCK IT.....LMAO. I CLOWN YOU FOR THAT 4-0 LOSS AND FOR BEING A DUCK FOR THE REST OF YOUR TIME HERE!
                Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                No posting about who really LIED/cheated. Any such posting will be an automatic DQ.
                .

                HE WANTED TO PROVE I LIED AND CHEATED. WHEN I CALLED HIS BLUFF...HE SAID ANYONE WHO TALKS ABOUT WHO LIED AND CHEATED GETS DISQUALIFIED



                Comment


                  I have a 107+ page thread that says that you Ducked a challenge that proves you are a LIAR and CHEAT!


                  I have a 44+ page thread that says that you Ducked a challenge that proves you are a LIAR and CHEAT!






                  DUCKY,
                  You can't even accept a challenge based on the statements from the initial debate!







                  Travestyny and DoNothing ran up the hill to DUCK the challenge.


                  Travestyny is saying that it means that only Travestyny Ducked not DoNothing.


                  Well, both of you are one and the same so either way, you are both DUCKs!!!!




                  .

                  Comment


                    JUST GIVE UP. DOSUMPTHIN ALREADY EXPOSED YOU. THERE AINT NO COMING BACK FROM THIS, SON.


                    Short answer:

                    ADP02 keeps saying threshold "type" test because he can not actually refer to EPO testing simply as a "threshold". Therefore everything he says is bull****.



                    Brief history:

                    ADP02 claimed Floyd used EPO vs Manny but it went undetected because EPO is a threshold substance....

                    He was proven wrong.

                    Then ADP02 says he meant EPO isn't a threshold substance but instead WADA uses a threshold test to detect rEPO.

                    He was proven wrong again. Judges were involved and voted 4-0 in an e-debate for points.

                    That is when he went full ******....



                    Now ADP02 changes it to "EPO was once upon a time measured by threshold "type" test in 2002" and claims he doesn't have to pay up on his points.


                    Basicially ADP02 has given up completely on his " Floyd/EPO" theory and has resorted to trying to prove Travestny wrong at something. Doesn't matter what about, he just needs to prove Travestny is wrong at anything at all cost. Somehow this will prove he is right all along.
                    [IMG]//i284.***********.com/albums/ll36/Bigsteve87/Gifs/AtomicBomb.gif[/IMG]

                    R.I.P.


                    [img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      proves you are a LIAR and CHEAT!
                      YET HE DECLINED A CHALLENGE TO PROVE THAT I WAS LYING A CHEATING AND SAID ANYONE WHO MENTIONS LYING AND CHEATING WILL BE DISQUALIFIED:


                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      No posting about who really LIED/cheated. Any such posting will be an automatic DQ.
                      .


                      MENTAL MELTDOWN LEVEL: SPOON23 STATUS



                      [img]//media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP