Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Zaroku]

come on, buddy....don't let me down....

i gave you a very good odd of just proving spoon wrong once and i will consider him wrong in all 5...

why? because if no one could dispute these 5 rounds and that said rounds should go to pac then the most floyd gets is 7-5....

and that is just granting floyd really won the 7 remaining rounds....

having said that, then there was really no domination, no schooling, no mastery etc etc

I will watch the whole fight. Round by round in context. No slow mo or commentary. Gimme some time. My old Sensei died recently, I watched his body being removed from his home. Mayweather vs PAC is less significant in comparison.

[Spoon23]

well, if this is the end of the line for you in this thread, so be it....

for i will not allow myself to be dragged into racism issues....

nor am i inclined now to prolong our exchanges here...

Travestyny, is a man of color. He doesn't even know that boxing transcends color. There is no boundaries in boxing. Everyone is equal in boxing only skill separates the men from the boys.

Racism is for the illiterate. Bringing out the race card only leaves a bad taste in your mouth. It shows cries of desperation lol

Travestyny is such a travesty

[Spoon23]

come on, buddy....don't let me down....

i gave you a very good odd of just proving spoon wrong once and i will consider him wrong in all 5...

why? because if no one could dispute these 5 rounds and that said rounds should go to pac then the most floyd gets is 7-5....

and that is just granting floyd really won the 7 remaining rounds....

having said that, then there was really no domination, no schooling, no mastery etc etc

There are 5 videos, of 8 rounds, rounds 2,3,6,7,8,9,10,12

Rounds 2,3,7,8,12 were given to Floyd unanimously

Rounds 9,10 only 1 judge gave to Floyd

Round 4 and 6 are unanimous to Pac on all 3 judges.

The 7 rounds are in question. If Pac gets the 7 rounds plus the 2 unanimous rounds. That's actually 9/3 Pac.

That's what the videos are all about.

[DeadLikeMe]

BWAA names Floyd Mayweather Fighter of the Year for his domination of Manny Pacquiao.

[tangalog2200]

There are 5 videos, of 8 rounds, rounds 2,3,6,7,8,9,10,12

Rounds 2,3,7,8,12 were given to Floyd unanimously

Rounds 9,10 only 1 judge gave to Floyd

Round 4 and 6 are unanimous to Pac on all 3 judges.

The 7 rounds are in question. If Pac gets the 7 rounds plus the 2 unanimous rounds. That's actually 9/3 Pac.

That's what the videos are all about.

sorry, my bad for not being clear....

but it is on the 5 rounds unanimously given to Floyd that i refer to; for the impact of proving all three judges erred as one; as the videos tend to show... means that judging that night was at its lowest level...for one reason or another....

i just "grant" that the remaining rounds (including those given to pac) to be for floyd to drive home the point that there was no domination, no schooling, no mastery..

and to take some posters cry for a review of all 12 rounds out of the equation....

still my bad he he he

[Spoon23]

sorry, my bad for not being clear....

but it is on the 5 rounds unanimously given to Floyd that i refer to; for the impact of proving all three judges erred as one; as the videos tend to show... means that judging that night was at its lowest level...for one reason or another....

i just "grant" that the remaining rounds (including those given to pac) to be for floyd to drive home the point that there was no domination, no schooling, no mastery..

and to take some posters cry for a review of all 12 rounds out of the equation....

still my bad he he he

To see it simply. Round 9 and 10 were 2 judges gave to Pac is a no brianer Pac rounds - 2pts

Rounds 4 and 6 is unanimously given to Pac by the three judges - 2pts

Now if the disputed rounds which are
2,3,6,7,8,12 were unanimously given to floyd were disputed.

As video evidence thus point to Pac deserved those rounds - 5pts

then, 2+2+5 = 9

Pac won 9 rounds out of 12.

It was a landslide victory.

# Vegas beat Pac not Floyd

[Real King Kong]

To see it simply. Round 9 and 10 were 2 judges gave to Pac is a no brianer Pac rounds - 2pts

Rounds 4 and 6 is unanimously given to Pac by the three judges - 2pts

Now if the disputed rounds which are
2,3,6,7,8,12 were unanimously given to floyd were disputed.

As video evidence thus point to Pac deserved those rounds - 5pts

then, 2+2+5 = 9

Pac won 9 rounds out of 12.

It was a landslide victory.

# Vegas beat Pac not Floyd

Hmm...this f@ggot has bumped his own thread again...

[tangalog2200]

To see it simply. Round 9 and 10 were 2 judges gave to Pac is a no brianer Pac rounds - 2pts

Rounds 4 and 6 is unanimously given to Pac by the three judges - 2pts

Now if the disputed rounds which are
2,3,6,7,8,12 were unanimously given to floyd were disputed.

As video evidence thus point to Pac deserved those rounds - 5pts

then, 2+2+5 = 9

Pac won 9 rounds out of 12.

It was a landslide victory.

# Vegas beat Pac not Floyd

"To see it simply. Round 9 and 10 were 2 judges gave to Pac is a no brianer Pac rounds - 2pts"

we could not be selective on accepting and/or not accepting the decision of the judges...

i mean, accepting the verdict of the 2 judges on rounds 9 & 10 as a no brainer pac rounds and questioning the verdict of all 3 judges on the 5 rounds mentioned given to floyd seems to be a double standard to me....unless i miss what you are really trying to say..

the above if i am not mistaken is the point zaroku and others were trying to impress on you in asking that all 12 rounds be reviewed....

i can see your point on the 9/3 pac winning the fight....

but that would be beyond the 8 rounds presented for review....

[Mr. Punch-Out!!]

@ 7:40 - illegal blows to the side doesn't count while clinched buddy. This is pro boxing not the amateurs. Those 4 shots are couldn't hurt a fly, no leverage means no effect, means weak and not scoring blows. This shot are like child like desperate shots to frustrate don't fool yourself those are lame punches my friend. This Is the hurt biz. that isn't a scoring blow.

I remember debating with somebody about those shots. I thought they looked like kidney shots to me (I remember Canelo shoved him for doing that).

[Spoon23]

"To see it simply. Round 9 and 10 were 2 judges gave to Pac is a no brianer Pac rounds - 2pts"

we could not be selective on accepting and/or not accepting the decision of the judges...

i mean, accepting the verdict of the 2 judges on rounds 9 & 10 as a no brainer pac rounds and questioning the verdict of all 3 judges on the 5 rounds mentioned given to floyd seems to be a double standard to me....unless i miss what you are really trying to say..

the above if i am not mistaken is the point zaroku and others were trying to impress on you in asking that all 12 rounds be reviewed....

i can see your point on the 9/3 pac winning the fight....

but that would be beyond the 8 rounds presented for review....

The rounds 9,10 are on the 4th video showing it was Pac rounds, plus the fact that 2 judges gave it to Pac. Makes the case, Pac clear rounds.

Round 4, 6 is an obvious Pac round since the 3 judges scored it for Pac and it is very much clear Pac rounds as videos provided shows.

That surmounts to 4 pts total.

Add the 5 rounds disputed that shows Pac truly won.

That's 9 rounds in the bag for Pac.

All these have videos on hand, on the front page.