Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Last Gasp Or New Beginning?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Last Gasp Or New Beginning?

    Will the MW/Pac fight really revive boxing, or is it the last gasp of a star becoming a red giant?

    The answer may be partially contingent on results. If there is anything that really stinks about the fight, like bad refereeing or a horrible call, it will not breathe life into the collapsed body of the sport.

    Only an event that lives up to its hype on every level will breathe any life back or create any revival at all.

    If fans are even mildly disappointed, wouldn't that just be business as usual for boxing, as people go away grumbling again?

    If past is precedent, get ready for another black eye and the respirator for boxing.

    #2
    Neither.
    It's another sign that this "boxing is dead" schtick is just bollocks.
    Last edited by NChristo; 04-29-2015, 05:57 PM.

    Comment


      #3
      I'll just buy into a famous Larry Merchant quote:

      "Nothing is going to save boxing, and nothing is going to kill it."

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
        I'll just buy into a famous Larry Merchant quote:

        "Nothing is going to save boxing, and nothing is going to kill it."
        Don't get yourself blocked, gal.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
          I'll just buy into a famous Larry Merchant quote:

          "Nothing is going to save boxing, and nothing is going to kill it."
          This^^^^^^^^^^^


          Two guys fist fighting will never die out

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
            This^^^^^^^^^^^


            Two guys fist fighting will never die out
            This ^^^^^^^

            Comment


              #7
              Boxing doesn't need reviving - it's doing quite well! But of course a "real" historian will always tell you, that boxing isn't what it used to be, that we're in the weakest era ever, with sissy boxers who could never have made it 'back in the day', etc. It was no different 100 years ago:

              The boxers today do not know how to fight... former bantamweight champion Harry forbes, 1911.

              I tell you they're a bunch of ham and egg fighters. Too bad they weren't around in the old days. They would have made good punching bags for real fighters.... Joe Choynski on the 1918 crop of fighters.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Bundana View Post
                Boxing doesn't need reviving - it's doing quite well! But of course a "real" historian will always tell you, that boxing isn't what it used to be, that we're in the weakest era ever, with sissy boxers who could never have made it 'back in the day', etc. It was no different 100 years ago:

                The boxers today do not know how to fight... former bantamweight champion Harry forbes, 1911.

                I tell you they're a bunch of ham and egg fighters. Too bad they weren't around in the old days. They would have made good punching bags for real fighters.... Joe Choynski on the 1918 crop of fighters.
                That is a great point, and the exact same can be said about the 'Boxing is dying' talks.
                Those type of articles were even made many decades ago when the fights were in black and white. Before Ali, Tyson and the Fab 4. Go figure.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Bundana View Post
                  Boxing doesn't need reviving - it's doing quite well! But of course a "real" historian will always tell you, that boxing isn't what it used to be, that we're in the weakest era ever, with sissy boxers who could never have made it 'back in the day', etc. It was no different 100 years ago:

                  The boxers today do not know how to fight... former bantamweight champion Harry forbes, 1911.

                  I tell you they're a bunch of ham and egg fighters. Too bad they weren't around in the old days. They would have made good punching bags for real fighters.... Joe Choynski on the 1918 crop of fighters.
                  Fighters of yesterday being better than today is subjective, but boxing not being the main stream sport it used to be is absolutely true.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
                    Will the MW/Pac fight really revive boxing, or is it the last gasp of a star becoming a red giant?
                    If Mayweather vs Pacquiao was meant to "revive" boxing I think someone must have switched the syringe marked "stimulant" for another labelled "euthanasia".

                    It really was an appalling advertisement for the sport. Basically, one fighter had knowingly waited for the other's skills to diminish to a fraction of their former glory and then pounced.

                    I know Manny is blaming an injury. But injury aside - he LOOKED a SHOT FIGHTER from the first minute. Not that Mayweather looked all that great either.

                    As for the undercard - ABYSMAL. No wonder so many people were booing in the crowd.

                    I can't remember feeling this depressed after a big fight as I do now. Boxing needs to take a long, hard look at itself and make changes. If not - I really do fear for its future as the sport I knew and loved growing up.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP