Wich boxing fights do you guys have?

[Yogi]

I HATE to break it 2 you. 1 6 9 10.

I relly hate to break it to you. Should I do it??? maybe not???


Round 1 is a later round(I guessing round 3 , I going to recheck my espn one, and recheck what round that is, BUT I KNOW ITS NOT THE FIRST ROUND)

Round 6 is right.

Round 9 is right.

But round ten is part of round ten, than they cut it, and give you MOST of round 4.

In Round 4, Dempsey ALMOST drops Tunney. (See the pic.)

The cut in round 4 is AFTER that. So you dont see the near knockdown, BUT it is still round 4.

Ok you can cry if you want.

So...ESPN was lying to me?!

You know what's funny though, I watched that first Tunney/Dempsey fight again the other day, and I made the observation in my head that in round ten that Tunney looked suprising fresh...LOL! Now I know why.

[Dempsey1238]

About 2 do REAL snap shots of round ten lol.

You own me money just for the right to view these

[Dempsey1238]

You would KNOW FOR SURE,

[IMG]//img.***********.com/albums/v737/greek1237/roundten.jpg[/IMG]

Round ends, with Dempsey TAKING a beating. On the ropes.


[IMG]//img.***********.com/albums/v737/greek1237/roundten2.jpg[/IMG]

You can see people rush the ring after the bell.

Meaning for us people that are dumb, the fight is over

[Dempsey1238]

yep you been had

Take that ESPN, you and your LIES.

[Yogi]

yep you been had

Take that ESPN, you and your LIES.

Yep, my copy of round "ten" ends wiht a short exchange in the clinches (ref seperates), followed by Dempsey bobbing-and weaving while Tunney throuws a couple of jabs. At the bell, Tunney does a little and fresh looking, spin around towards his corner.

Alright, how much for those photos?

I got about $80,000,000 or something like that, so the cost shouldn't be beyond what I can afford.

[Dempsey1238]

well its round 4.

How do you feel?? Are you shock?? Do you still trust Espn??

[Yogi]

well its round 4.

How do you feel?? Are you shock?? Do you still trust Espn??

Oh, I'll live, I think, and what you said doesn't shock me all that much, because like I said I made that observation about Tunney appearing quite "fresh" during what they called the tenth round...

And you know, I think I'll have to go over some more of my older fights that were broadcast by ESPN (the incomplete fights mostly), and if I make that same kind of "fresh" observation in others, I think I'll have to look into it more just to see if they're lying once again...I would expect I have one or more other fights like that and I'd be suprised if I didn't.

[Heckler]

whats the quality of 1920's film like, does it make the boxers look bad? is it watchable?

[Dempsey1238]

whats the quality of 1920's film like, does it make the boxers look bad? is it watchable?

Depends on the fight it self. Some old fight films are BAD in viewing because they have decay over time, and other times, they are in good viewing order.

Dempsey Tunney 1 or 2 are in good viewing order, While Walker Hudking are poor in viewing.

Depends on the fight it self.

I say for the most part it is watchable, Also rember the speed might not always be right as the camerals were hand crank. So if the guy crank it too fast, The fighters will appear fast, slow, and they are slow down.

Dempsey Tunney 2 is pretty fast, while Dempsey Willard has about the fight speed(Theater version, NOT Espn version)

[Imira]

My list is on my journal, but it's far from complete. I'll complete it tonight and post it here.