20 billion:Do you agree with D'Amato that a swarming fighter could never beat Foreman

[Willow The Wisp]

Well said bud. People have to question themselves, boxers don't just find tremendous success at the elite level by simply being predictable, crude etc. There is always more to it. This sport is called the sweet science for a reason, it is too evolved to just be taken over by a simple powerhouse especially not in the era Foreman was fighting in.

It's kind of sad that boxing history has overlooked Foreman a bit in this regard. IMO he is one of the most fascinating boxers you can find because of the old school grappling techniques(which would also be very beneficial in MMA where dirty boxing is legal) he used so efficiently.

Most just know him for his punching power and strength. But the deeper you look into his blocking, arm/torso manipulation of opponents, the anticipation of incoming punches and the counters etc. the more you realize he was an intelligent fighter with high fight IQ.

In his comeback he started to implement the cross guard for defense more. I think as he aged and slowed down it was much harder to control faster, younger opponents the same way. Which is why I said earlier that Foreman fought so well because he had remarkable genetics. It takes so much grappling strength, arm endurance and a great chin, it's kind of a high reward high risk style too, Frazier still nailed him with some hard left hooks and when he was too relaxed with it, a guy like Lyle made him pay for it. But this man was a machine.

Absolutely 100 percent. Foreman was a marvel. Sadler knew it, Moore knew it, Clancy knew it too.

[QueensburyRules]

I dont need to explain much look at the matches the reactions

- - We still lookin' blank sheet top 10 of U heavyweights.

U stop doin' comedy?