I think you are misunderstanding the facts here. If you are a King fighter then you will most probably get a title shot sooner than if you were not a King fighter, due to back handers paid to the WBC. In other words if you are not a King fighter you work your way up and if you are then you get to use the back door i.e King decides for his fighters
I know what the facts are.. The facts are the rules, and the WBC broke those rules by allowing Don King to up sanctioning fees. We've already agreed that Holyfield wasn't a King fighter, but when Sulaiman agreed that Holyfield's 2nd defense would be against Foreman, King threw a fit and demanded that he fought Mike Tyson.. It was on King's intruction that the WBC unlawfully stripped him of his title, and it was Don King and NOT the WBC who Holyfield had to take to court in order to get it back, which tbh, proves beyond reasonable doubt that King is almost running the show.
The WBO title back then was seen as worthless belt, kind of like how the IBObelt is seen today. Even Bowe would say that the belt was stiffling his career. If Lewis had fought him and won the belt then he would have been dropped from the rankings of the WBC, IBF and WBA
At the time Bowe became WBO champ, Lewis was fighting the likes of Justin Fortune and Lionel Butler.. He was a challenger, fighting to get back into contention after losing to McCall and bar revenge, had very little to hold him back.. But yes you're right, The WBO belt wasn't taken at all seriously back then.
How do you know its for King and not for the greedy execs at the WBC?
You also pay to be ranked with the sanctioning bodies as well
How do you know if someone's pissing up your back and telling you it's raining?... All i've got is dozens of testaments from professional boxer's who have dealt with the WBC.. Tie this with the fact that the execs at the other sanctioning bodies only want half as much, and you have your answer, Don King.
This just means that they are greedier than the other sanctioning bodies, Why are they giving money to King? Its the other way around, he bribes them so they look after his fighters
Sulaiman and King make money for one another.. As I said earlier, I can't prove what percentage of who's fee goes to who, but I can prove that King is given an obscene amount of power by the WBC.
Again I think you are misunderstanding the facts, Tyson was a King fighter who never got himself a decent manager, lawyer or accountant. King was ripping him off left right and centre, using the WBC as one tool for doing so
I'm not misunderstanding, I'm just saying that the WBC are raking in double bubble from either end, and most of the evidence suggests that King has his hand in the till.. It's almost impossible for me to believe that the only concession given to King by Sulaiman, is getting his fighters looked after..
I know what the facts are.. The facts are the rules, and the WBC broke those rules by allowing Don King to up sanctioning fees. We've already agreed that Holyfield wasn't a King fighter, but when Sulaiman agreed that Holyfield's 2nd defense would be against Foreman, King threw a fit and demanded that he fought Mike Tyson.. It was on King's intruction that the WBC unlawfully stripped him of his title, and it was Don King and NOT the WBC who Holyfield had to take to court in order to get it back, which tbh, proves beyond reasonable doubt that King is almost running the show.
The WBO title back then was seen as worthless belt, kind of like how the IBObelt is seen today. Even Bowe would say that the belt was stiffling his career. If Lewis had fought him and won the belt then he would have been dropped from the rankings of the WBC, IBF and WBA
At the time Bowe became WBO champ, Lewis was fighting the likes of Justin Fortune and Lionel Butler.. He was a challenger, fighting to get back into contention after losing to McCall and bar revenge, had very little to hold him back.. But yes you're right, The WBO belt wasn't taken at all seriously back then.
How do you know its for King and not for the greedy execs at the WBC?
You also pay to be ranked with the sanctioning bodies as well
How do you know if someone's pissing up your back and telling you it's raining?... All i've got is dozens of testaments from professional boxer's who have dealt with the WBC.. Tie this with the fact that the execs at the other sanctioning bodies only want half as much, and you have your answer, Don King.
This just means that they are greedier than the other sanctioning bodies, Why are they giving money to King? Its the other way around, he bribes them so they look after his fighters
Sulaiman and King make money for one another.. As I said earlier, I can't prove what percentage of who's fee goes to who, but I can prove that King is given an obscene amount of power by the WBC.
Again I think you are misunderstanding the facts, Tyson was a King fighter who never got himself a decent manager, lawyer or accountant. King was ripping him off left right and centre, using the WBC as one tool for doing so
I'm not misunderstanding, I'm just saying that the WBC are raking in double bubble from either end, and most of the evidence suggests that King has his hand in the till.. It's almost impossible for me to believe that the only concession given to King by Sulaiman, is getting his fighters looked after..
Comment