For me its saad, he took alot more chances! he didnt have a wbo belt and big promoter to hide behind, saad had to fight the best every time unlike calzaghe! and if they would of met at lightheavy sadd stops calzaghe inside ten rounds
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mathew Saad Muhammed or Joe Calzaghe who was the greater fighter?
Collapse
-
-
I think it's alot closer than people are making. I feel Calzaghe is getting underrated here.......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joey Giardello View PostFor me its saad, he took alot more chances! he didnt have a wbo belt and big promoter to hide behind, saad had to fight the best every time unlike calzaghe! and if they would of met at lightheavy sadd stops calzaghe inside ten rounds
Fighters from this era as a whole choose and pick their way to a sucessful career. There are exceptions today but as a whole it is messed up. Blame it on split titles and shady sanctioning bodies or on greedy managers and promoters, or even on a misled group of fighters but looking back it is not hard to see some golden eras and true warriors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TBear View PostI'm not the biggest fan of comparing fighters because they fight different opponents, but I tend to agree with this.
Fighters from this era as a whole choose and pick their way to a sucessful career. There are exceptions today but as a whole it is messed up. Blame it on split titles and shady sanctioning bodies or on greedy managers and promoters, or even on a misled group of fighters but looking back it is not hard to see some golden eras and true warriors.
Comment
Comment