Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mathew Saad Muhammed or Joe Calzaghe who was the greater fighter?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Mathew Saad Muhammed or Joe Calzaghe who was the greater fighter?

    For me its saad, he took alot more chances! he didnt have a wbo belt and big promoter to hide behind, saad had to fight the best every time unlike calzaghe! and if they would of met at lightheavy sadd stops calzaghe inside ten rounds

    #2
    Originally posted by Joey Giardello View Post
    For me its saad, he took alot more chances! he didnt have a wbo belt and big promoter to hide behind, saad had to fight the best every time unlike calzaghe! and if they would of met at lightheavy sadd stops calzaghe inside ten rounds
    agree 100%

    Comment


      #3
      Saad has got to be the most excting tv fighter of all time!!

      Comment


        #4
        I think it's alot closer than people are making. I feel Calzaghe is getting underrated here.......

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Joey Giardello View Post
          For me its saad, he took alot more chances! he didnt have a wbo belt and big promoter to hide behind, saad had to fight the best every time unlike calzaghe! and if they would of met at lightheavy sadd stops calzaghe inside ten rounds
          I'm not the biggest fan of comparing fighters because they fight different opponents, but I tend to agree with this.

          Fighters from this era as a whole choose and pick their way to a sucessful career. There are exceptions today but as a whole it is messed up. Blame it on split titles and shady sanctioning bodies or on greedy managers and promoters, or even on a misled group of fighters but looking back it is not hard to see some golden eras and true warriors.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by TBear View Post
            I'm not the biggest fan of comparing fighters because they fight different opponents, but I tend to agree with this.

            Fighters from this era as a whole choose and pick their way to a sucessful career. There are exceptions today but as a whole it is messed up. Blame it on split titles and shady sanctioning bodies or on greedy managers and promoters, or even on a misled group of fighters but looking back it is not hard to see some golden eras and true warriors.
            Yes all the fighters in todays era dont reliaze how good they have got it! you go and look at mathew saad muhammed's early career he was fighting good fighters right from the start! he never ducked no one and was always willing to fight anybody! unlike calzaghe who made alot of title defences against fighters who are a insult to journeymen! any one remember some of those mismatches calzaghe was in fighters the like's of rick ****ing thornberry??? will mcintyre???? and the best of the lot Tocker Pudwill!!!! lol calzaghe was spoon fed ****e! then beat up on old legends and over hyped musle head jeff lacy do you think calzaghe would of made all them defences of his belt defending against fighters like john conteh, marvin johnson, eddie mustafa muhammad, yaqui lopez and dwight muhammed qawi?? not a chance!

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP