Originally posted by Willie Pep 229
View Post
But there are aspects to the game here that seem to make some sense, when pulled out of the chaos. For one thing, primitive does not equal lesser than, vis a vis, less effective. The pressure guy forever is forsaken in his quest to keep coming, even when his skill in taking the punch of an opponent properly, setting up to keep his opponent on his back leg, and his intuition telling him when to pour in on, operate at the height of efficiency.
The two most consistent men cited as the absolute best fighters were, in order, Robinson and Armstrong. Things have changed and Hank does not always trail, or equal Robinson these days... But again when we look at the dichotomy between Apollo, the ordered tools of the assasin, whether they be the bullfighter who cruelly uses specific weapons on the Bull (do not agree with it) or the fighter, Robinson is the man, while Dionasyn, wine soaked craziness, the pure fight, savage and unrelenting, Armstrong is the archetype. Sam squarely falls into this second category, no doubt. Can we dissect his fights like we can with armstrong? I think given the film issues it is tough but possible.
Try this: it has been remastered. Im looking at it now lol.
Comment