By the way, I voted for Marciano. Him, Ali and Lennox, if they fought every boxer in history 3 times they would win atleast 1, and 99% of the trilogies.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
POLL: Which HW boxer would be the most trouble regardless of era?
Collapse
-
-
I went with Foreman, but a good argument can be made for Ali. I just dont think an argument can be made against Foreman seeing as he proved it. Foreman is a beast
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostBy the way, I voted for Marciano. Him, Ali and Lennox, if they fought every boxer in history 3 times they would win atleast 1, and 99% of the trilogies.
Btw i voted for Ali. But i think Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Lewis, Louis and Frazier would be succesfull in every era.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ReppinDubK View PostI went with Foreman, but a good argument can be made for Ali. I just dont think an argument can be made against Foreman seeing as he proved it. Foreman is a beast
Foreman looked great against STYLES MISMATCHES. But he FAILED miserably many times.
Ali? He fought everybody and beat them all, even against HUGE style mismatches such as against Norton and Frazier. Those were his only real losses, and he avenged those defeats. Showed he was the best.
Foreman didn't, but he can say he was very depressed and it's all good.
Originally posted by The Iron Man View PostI struggle to see how marciano would be more effective than the other heavies on that list, in fact i every heavyweight on that list would be a tough fight for Rocky. In his time he was great, but i dont think he would travel eras aswell as the others.
Btw i voted for Ali. But i think Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Lewis, Louis and Frazier would be succesfull in every era.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ReppinDubK View PostI went with Foreman, but a good argument can be made for Ali. I just dont think an argument can be made against Foreman seeing as he proved it. Foreman is a beast
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostLet me guess. Size right? Of cource, boxing has nothing to do with boxing skills, it's all about how much you weigh etc.Last edited by F l i c k e r; 05-16-2009, 07:30 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by F l i c k e r View PostMay I co-sign? Foreman definately.
I love Rocky Marciano. I think with his power he could be but he wouldn't be undefeated in eras after his own. Because as time went on, HWs learned how to run away.... I mean "manuever" around alot more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostLet me guess. Size right? Of cource, boxing has nothing to do with boxing skills, it's all about how much you weigh etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Iron Man View PostNot solely, i think size would be a factor against people who know how to use it. But out of all those fighters i think he was the least skilled. I cant see him being effective in the 60s, 70s, 80s or even 90s. People like foreman, ali, Holmes, Frazier, Tyson, Lewis, Holyfield and probably Bowe would be too much for him, Tua would also have given Marciano a tough tough fight. In his time and against those opponents Marciano was brilliant, but he doesn't travel eras as well as other heavies.
You're still not being clear at all mate. Just saying "they would be too much for him" isn't gonna convince me. That's too easy.
Comment
Comment